A Green Road Journal

Quaker Inspired, Evidence Based, Art And Science Of Sustainable Health Plus Success - How To Create Heaven On Earth - Education For Seventh Generation Rainbow Warriors

Share this post:
BP Gulf Oil Spill Disaster; Gulf Seafood Radium Levels; Chernobyl Like Radiation in the Gulf of Mexico And In Sea Food, Corexit Health Warning Fossil Fuel Industry And Corexit is Poisoning The Gulf, Marine Life, Workers and Public


Chelsea Manning, WikiLeaks, and The Deepwater Horizon – Greg Palast
Five years ago this month, on the 20th of April, 2010, the BP Deepwater Horizondrilling rig blew itself to kingdom come.

Soon thereafter, a message came in to our office’s chief of investigations, Ms Badpenny, from a person I dare not name, who was floating somewhere in the Caspian Sea along the coast of Baku, Central Asia.

The source was in mortal fear he’d be identified ”“ and with good reason. Once we agreed on a safe method of communication, he revealed this: 17 months before BP’sDeepwaterHorizonblew out and exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, another BP rig suffered an identical blow-out in the Caspian Sea.

Crucially, both the Gulf and Caspian Sea blow-outs had the same identical cause: the failure of the cement “plug”.

To prevent blow-outs, drilled wells must be capped with cement. BP insisted on lacing its cement with nitrogen gas ”“ the same stuff used in laughing gas ”“ because it speeds up drying.

Time is money, and mixing some nitrogen gas into the cement saves a lot of money.

However, because BP’s penny-pinching method is so damn dangerous, they are nearly alone in using it in deep, high-pressure offshore wells.

The reason: nitrogen gas can create gaps in the cement, allow methane gas to go up the borehole, fill the drilling platform with explosive gas ”“ and boom, you’re dead.

So, when its Caspian Sea rig blew out in 2008, rather than change its ways, BP simply covered it up.

Chelsea Manning, WikiLeaks, and The Deepwater Horizon are all connected. The people covering up all of the dirt like the Deepwater Horizon disaster, are the 1 percent at the top of huge corporations, and/or they are billionaires, every time. They don’t want to be held accountable or look bad. They will do just about anything to whistle blowers, just to keep it out of the public eye, and the evening news.


As oil companies drill for oil in deeper and more dangerous places, like in the ocean, the disasters become larger and more toxic as well. 

Health Warning: Corexit is Poisoning The Gulf, Marine Life, Workers and Public!!!

killthespill Health Warning: Corexit is Poisoning The Gulf, Marine Life, Workers and Public!!! What you should know to protect your family and yourself. The Government is suppressing the media regarding the effects of corexit on marine life and public health trying to cover-up the truth. Don't be foolish enough to believe everything the government tells you it could cost you your life. The government was involved in radioactive testing on mentally retarded patients at the Fernald State School in Waltham, Massachusetts. CAMBRIDGE -- 

More than 120 mentally retarded children -- some as young as 10 years old -- ate or were injected with radioactive material in federally sponsored nutrition studies at the Fernald State School in Waltham in the 1940s and 1950s, MIT records show, suggesting that the tests were far more extensive than previously believed. MIT records also indicate that 23 pregnant women at the Boston Lying-In Hospital, now part of Brigham and Women's Hospital, were injected with a radioactive form of iron in the early 1950s to help researchers understand the blood of pregnant women.... 

BP/ Coast Guard carpet bombed the Gulf with Corexit poisoning marine life, workers & the public BP's latest oil spill response update says the total amount of the dispersant used in the Gulf of Mexico more than 1,841,000 gallons. 1.07 million gallons on the surface. But what most people don't know is that the active ingredient of the toxic chemical dispersant, which is up to 60% by volume, being sprayed by BP to fight the Gulf oil spill is a neurotoxin pesticide that is acutely toxic to both human and aquatic life, causes cancer, causes damage to internal organs such as the liver and kidneys simply by absorbing it through the skin and may cause reproductive side effects. 

In fact the neurotoxin pesticide that is lethal to 50% of life in concentrations as little as 2.6 parts per million has been banned for use in the UK since 1998 because it failed the UK "Rocky shore test" which assures that the dispersant does not cause a "significant deleterious ecological change" -- or to put that in layman's terms it can kill off the entire food chain. Corexit has also earned the highest EPA warning label for toxicity which means the effects of the toxic chemicals to the eye are corrosive resulting in irreversible destruction of ocular tissue and other tissue with corneal involvement along with an burning that can persist for more than 21 days and effects to human skin are corrosive resulting in tissue destruction into the dermis and/or scarring. 

Gulf Coast Residents File Personal Injury Suit Over Oil Dispersant According to the plaintiff's attorney whose firm filed the suit, for more than 100 people in recent months have received emergency room treatments for nausea, dizziness, shortness of breath and extreme headaches. Those problems, he alleges, are the result of exposure to Corexit. Hundreds more have visited their personal doctors for similar problems. 

The EPA advised BP and the Coast Guard to limit the use of dispersants on top of the ocean due to ecological and possible health issues that may arise from its usage. BP and the Coast Guard ignored the EPA and sprayed hundreds of thousands of gallons of it above the surface of the ocean. Many residents in the gulf say BP/ Coast Guard sprayed the dispersant close to the coastline at night and believe it made land fall making many of them ill. There have been many reports of cleanup workers becoming ill after they cleaned up oil containing Corexit. BP refuses to link the illnesses to the dispersant and its usage."

Although the video above does not talk about radiation specifically, pay attention to the tests and where they find traces of oil, even though the ocean water looks 'clean' and safe. Notice as well that certain species seem to have stopped reproducing and others are found full of toxic black goo. Combine this information with this article about radiation being found in seafood. ..........
by Stuart H. Smith

It’s been years since BP’s runaway Macondo Well began filling the northern waters of the Gulf of Mexico with more than 200 million gallons of sweet crude, fouling shorelines from Louisiana’s marshes to the Florida Panhandle. As our nation’s worst man-made environmental disaster unfolded, it quickly became the lead story of the summer – with photos of oiled birds and video of gushing oil entrancing the American public, and the world.

Yet despite the barrage of around-the-clock coverage and the army of scientists studying the impacts, one of the stories that hasn’t made headlines is that in addition to the crude and toxic dispersants, the spill also released dangerous amounts of radioactive material into the Gulf.

Once the well was capped in mid-July of last year, mainstream media resources and the public were quick to turn away from the disaster and its far-reaching impacts on the environment, marine life, wildlife and, of course, people. Much like the oil itself – strategically sunk to the Gulf floor by BP’s use of the toxic dispersant Corexit – national news coverage of the spill’s effects has largely vanished, although we did see the expected round of first-year anniversary stories.

But still no mention of radioactive material.

The true extent of the spill’s damage is just now beginning to come into view for clean-up workers, commercial fishermen, oil-well workers, charter boat captains, restaurant owners, Gulf Coast denizens and independent scientists studying the effects of the spill – and the fallout becomes more troubling by the day. Independent researchers, like Samantha Joye from the University of Georgia, report that oil coats the Gulf floor where it has decimated deep-water marine life.


Gulf seafood deformities alarm scientists | Al Jazeera English

"It's almost two years since BP's oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Now, scientists say they have found deformities among seafood and a great decline in the numbers of marine life. Dahr Jamail reports from New Orleans."


Residents up and down the Gulf Coast report that tar balls and mats continue to litter their beaches, and re-oilings are common. The multi-billion-dollar Gulf seafood industry is reeling from both small catches and plummeting demand brought on by very real concerns about contamination. 

Dead dolphins and sea turtles continue to wash ashore at record-breaking rates. Oyster beds have been devastated and are in desperate need of restoration. And perhaps most disturbing of all, increasingly large numbers of clean-up workers and coastal residents are getting sick.


BP Slick Covers Dolphins and Whales

Oil spills sicken and kill dolphins and whales too.. 

archerfir7 BP;US Coast Guard, and Evergreen Air added 40 million gallons of the various types of Corexit to the waters and shores of the Gulf Of Mexico. Several viles of water tested near Grand Isle,LA were 400 ppm in a lab test on June 10, 2010. Corexit dispersant mixed with oil is 11 times more toxic than the oil itself. Corexit is less toxic alone than mixed with crude oil. Why did US Coast Guard turn LA State owned oil barges around? Why not recycle the crude oil from the surface? Why does BP own USCG?"

Reports of unexplained health problems are soaring – and the primary suspects are the toxic compounds contained in BP’s oil and the chemical dispersants used to break down the crude. From flu-like symptoms to blindness to intense chest pain to severe sinus inflammation, people across the Gulf region are reporting debilitating illnesses in the wake of the spill.

To determine how the spill may be causing this spike in sicknesses, we need to look at how the toxins are released into the environment.

The production of oil delivers several different waste streams into the environment in an uncontrolled release like the BP disaster. Besides the oil itself, highly toxic compounds are also present in the gas streams jettisoned from the well, including methane and hydrogen sulfide. A waste byproduct known as “produced water” is also simultaneously discharged with the oil and gases from the well. Every oil and gas formation, or reservoir, contains these waste streams.

The toxins associated with these streams can be broken down into three primary categories: (1) organic elements like benzene; (2) inorganic heavy metals including lead, chromium and cadmium; and (3) most important, naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM). 

Radioactive elements such as radium, thorium and uranium are known byproducts of the oil production process. These toxic elements are extracted from the ground along with the oil and gas, and are separated from the fossil fuels as part of the production process. 

Once the NORM is extracted, it is flushed directly back into the ocean in the waste-stream byproduct known as produced water. Their discharge into the Gulf of Mexico has been a daily reality since the 1950s – but the amount that was released into the water from the runaway Macondo Well is unprecedented.

As if NORM exposure from offshore drilling processes wasn’t enough to worry about, the New York Times published a high-profile article in late February (see link below) on the dangers of radioactive exposure onshore from the drilling process known as hydrofracking.

Fracking, as it is commonly called, involves the injection of water and a mixture of highly toxic chemicals into wells to break up rock formations that hold large amounts of natural gas. However, just like the offshore drilling process, the produced-water waste stream created by fracking contains dangerous levels of NORM that can contaminate inland waterways and has even been dumped in water sewage plants in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and New York. These types of treatment facilities don’t test for radioactivity so there is no way of telling just how much NORM is being mixed directly into drinking water.

The Times also uncovered a bombshell “secret industry study” from the American Petroleum Institute (API). The study, written in 1990, states that consuming seafood from the Gulf of Mexico poses “potentially significant risks” of cancer to humans due to the radium levels in produced water discharges. The EPA has yet to publicly release a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the volume of produced water being discharged in the Gulf of Mexico or its effect on human and marine life.

As someone who has spent the last 20-odd years litigating against the oil and gas industry for damages caused by radioactive oilfield waste, I had serious concerns that the BP spill released a significant amount of NORM into the Gulf. I knew the damage from the radioactive material could be acute and long-lasting to the Gulf ecosystem – and could linger for hundreds of years. Radium-226, a primary component of NORM, has a half-life of 1,600 years (the time it takes for the element to decay to half of its original mass). 

In pursuing my hunch that large amounts of NORM were discharged during the nearly three months the oil spewed from the Deepwater Horizon site, I obtained a sample of the oil from the Macondo Well and had it sent to an independent laboratory in the United Kingdom. The results are now in and the presence of a significant quantity of radioactive material has been confirmed by Dr. Chris Busby, a chemical physicist of the U.K.-based environmental watchdog organization Green Audit. 

Dr. Busby’s report (see link below) on the laboratory findings suggests that as much as 50 kilograms of uranium, or about 110 pounds, were released into the Gulf of Mexico from the BP spill. According to Dr. Busby, the tests showed the uranium content in the oil to be 0.073 mg/kg, or more than 500 times the normal concentration of uranium in seawater. 

The Gulf of Mexico is a large body of water but even a small amount of radioactive material can have a devastating impact on life in a marine ecosystem – as well as on humans who are unfortunate enough to come into direct contact with it.

Alarmed by his findings, Dr. Busby warns:
This level of uranium exposure is thousands of times more dangerous than the ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) risk model suggests. We should be very concerned that this material is showing up in an ecosystem with shrimp, crabs, fish, and other animals that humans consume on a daily basis.

The uranium content in the oil is not the only concern, radon gases would also have been present in the methane expelled from the well and significant concentrations of radium-226 and radium-228 would have been present in the produced water discharged from the well. No estimates of these radioactive discharges have been publicly released by BP or the federal government.

To significantly compound the potential human health risks associated with the disaster, the radioactive oil burned off at the water surface resulted in radioactive isotopes becoming airborne. 

Once airborne, the radioactive particles can be easily inhaled into the human respirator system. We are unaware of any studies or dose reconstructions that have been done, or will be done, by BP or the federal government to assess the risk from this human exposure pathway. 

Dr. Busby explains the health risk:
Uranium is increasingly seen to be a very serious hazard to humans due to its high affinity for genetic material and its ability to trap and amplify natural background gamma radiation at the one place in the body it can do most harm. For this reason, humans have developed responses to uranium ingestion over evolutionary time scales in the form of low absorption from the gut. 

But humans have never had to deal with uranium inhalation. Once inhaled, uranium can directly enter the brain or pass through the lungs into the lymphatic nodes and blood system, causing the wide range of neurological conditions that were identified as Gulf War syndrome at one extreme and cancer at the other.

Busby said the workers who were closest to the controlled burns of the oil would have been particularly susceptible to radiation exposure.

The physical symptoms of radioactive exposure are very similar to the symptoms produced by exposure to the other toxic compounds in the oil, flu-like symptoms which continue over long periods of time. 

Specific symptoms from radiation exposure include: neurological problems such as memory loss, headaches and balance problems, even seizures; stomach and digestive problems, such as diarrhea; sweating; dizziness; nosebleeds and bleeding from the ears, rectum and urinary tract; trouble sleeping; and rashes or skin irritations are also be cause for concern.

If any of these symptoms are observed, it is imperative that the person affected seek medical attention as soon as possible. If first contact with a medical professional results in a dismissal of the person’s symptoms, he or she should not be discouraged. 

Many people across the Gulf region are experiencing similar health problems, and most doctors are not familiar with the effects of chemical or radiation exposure. Affected persons should continue to seek medical help.

Uncontrolled NORM discharges occur on a daily basis during the oil production process in the Gulf of Mexico. While much of the material produced in deeper waters is dispersed into the water column and partitions into smaller concentrations, production in shallower waters produces radioactive material that settles on the ocean floor where it accumulates and comes into direct contact with bottom-feeding marine life. The radioactive elements are consumed by these benthic organisms then work their way back up the food chain to larger animals – and can eventually contaminate humans who consume seafood from the Gulf.

Due to lack of research, little is know about the effects of NORM exposure in the Gulf of Mexico and how it affects ocean life and humans. However, numerous land-based studies have shown that human exposure to even small traces of radioactivity can prove deadly.

Radium has a half-life of about 1,600 years while uranium lingers for billions of years. Yes, that’s billions with a “b.” Once the material is introduced into the Gulf ecosystem whatever effect it has, for the most part, it will be permanent.

A white paper authored by radioactive waste experts Marvin Resnikoff, Ph.D and Stanley J. Waligora, Jr. for the Louisiana Environmental Action Network (LEAN) suggests that as much as 6,000 Ci (curie) of radium are released into the Gulf waters by the oil production process every year. Very little regulation and monitoring has been put in place by the EPA or state agencies to assess the amount of radioactive material being discharged into the Gulf.

Of particular concern is the cumulative effect of the radioactive fallout occurring from oil and gas platforms near fragile marine estuaries such as oyster beds. In fact, as the white paper notes, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) doesn’t even require rig owners to test for radioactive material in their produced-water discharge. 

We really don’t know how bad the problem is, but the cursory data is cause for serious concern. Despite repeated requests, the LDEQ has refused to require the oil and gas industry to pay for an independent environmental impact statement (EIS) to assess the risk inherent in these discharges.

Aside from the human impact, the BP spill is a clarion call to recognize the damage inflicted on the Gulf’s fragile ecosystem for the past half century brought on by the race to, “Drill, baby, Drill!” The coastal ecosystem of Louisiana is a litmus test for states who are considering drilling off their own shores. 

With possible plans to expand offshore oil production from California to Florida, this isn’t just a Gulf Coast problem, it’s a national and even international problem we all have to face. 

The mad scramble for offshore, black gold continues unabated around the world despite the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Major offshore installations are either in place or planned for South America, Asia, Africa, Australia, and the Arctic Ocean region. The very health of our planet’s oceans is at stake.

Here’s the NYT article on the dangers of fracking:

See state and federal agency documents on fracking and the associated toxic waste here:

Dr. Busby’s report on the discharge of radioactive material into the Gulf is here: http://www.scribd.com/full/49647149?access_key=key-1xcpnhn9boiq0tewc6iu

The white paper on produced waters is here:

Reprinted with permission by author. 

Email gulfofmexicooilspillblog@gmail.com for more info. 

The above article focuses ONLY on the Radium in the oil and it's effect.


Next, let's focus on the negative effects on health of the poisonous Corexit, which is toxic and dangerous all by itself. 

Combine the toxic and dangerous radium radiation above, with toxic heavy metals in the oil, plus the toxic effects the oil itself broken up into tiny nano particles by the Corexit. Larger particles could theoretically be avoided by sea life because they can see large globs of oil and swim around them. But super tiny particles of oil look like food, and are breathed into and stick to gills and filter feeders like mussels, shrimp, clams and many more. 

This dangerous tiny/toxic particle combination is then eaten as plankton and breathed in by fish and other sea life, in addition to the other junk coming into the Gulf from the rivers and air... It is simply amazing that anything is still living in the Gulf at all.

Human testing has been done on the toxic chemicals being found in people's blood. Listen to the following video of how these toxic chemicals end up inside of human beings, from Eyewitness News. These chemicals can be eaten, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin.

Gulf toxicologist: Shrimpers exposed to Corexit "bleeding from the rectum"


Peak Oil - Are We Over The Peak, And If So, What Happens Next? via @AGreenRoad

Earthquake Causing, Toxic Sinkholes of Stupid, Empires Of Radioactive Fracking Idiocracy

Radioactive Heavy Metal Poisonous NORM/TENORM Waste Produced By Carbon, Oil, Gas Fuel Industry And Then Contaminating Air, Ground And Water Is Huge Problem, Methane From Coal, Oil Or Carbon Fuel

Fracking Radioactive Waste Generating Companies, Landfills And Garbage Dumps Near You Are Getting Into Nuclear Waste Disposal Business, In Pursuit Of Shale Oil

Radioactive Heavy Metal Poisonous Waste Produced By Carbon, Oil, Gas Fuel Industry And Then Contaminating Air, Ground And Water Is Huge Problem, There Is No Clean Coal, Oil Or Carbon Fuel

Long Term BP Oil Spill Effects Have Resulted In Hundreds Of Thousands Of People Negatively Affected And A Gulf Of Mexico Graveyard, Record 18 Billion Dollar Fine Paid

How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco’s Tactics to Lie About Global Warming, And Manufacture Uncertainty on Climate Science, Promote CO2; Harmless Gas That Promotes Health Via Hormesis

Gulf Oil Spill, Corexit And Toxic Health Effects Explored

BP Gulf Oil Spill Disaster; Gulf Seafood Radium Levels; Chernobyl Like Radiation in the Gulf of Mexico And In Sea Food

Uranium Mining, Enrichment, Nuclear Fuel Chain, Open Air Testing, Fracking

Going Naked, Car Recalls, Car Insurance, Nuclear Power And Nuclear Waste, What They Don't Have In Common; Legal Immunity Reason For Lawsuits? No Insurance For Nuclear Radiation

The ‘long, sordid history' of Texas’ most brazen polluter 

Gov’t agrees with blogs, BP not telling truth about devastation in Gulf — “It’s hard to stress the critical importance of these court filings
Who is being tested today for the chemical and radiological and heavy metal poisons left behind by the fossil fuel industry leaks, spills and disasters like this one? Those toxic fossil fuel and chemical poisons don't just disappear by magic. 

BP Gulf Oil Spill, Disturbing test results
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/xMTpe7LseKU?t=4  8 min.

Bottom line, civilized people in countries like the US, Russia and others are living in unsustainable ways.

Humanity is getting back the toxins, heavy metal radioactive poisons and chemicals that are being put into the animals they eat, as well as the air, water and soil.

People will not enjoy the consequences, which are unavoidable.

Anything that is not sustainable is TERMINAL.

The war on Nature continues, but it cannot be won. Nature always bats last and wins every time, guaranteed.


Keep asking the question; what works for seven future generations without causing harm? 



Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?

Donate To A Green Road Project; Help Dr. Goodheart Teach How To Make A Positive Difference For Seven Future Generations Of Children, Animals, Plants And The Planet


Click to Translate; 60 languages - German, French, Russian, Spanish


Join the AGR Network. Forward this or any other article by clicking on the social media facebook, google plus and/or twitter buttons below any AGRP article. The first step for activists is to bring awareness of an issue to the public, by being informed yourself. Which news and information network do you prefer to plug into and network with?

Follow A Green Road Daily News on Wordpress

Like - AGRP Facebook Official Daily News Page 

 Follow AGRP on Twitter 

 Dr. Goodhearts Professional Network on LinkedIn 

 Subscribe; View Library Of 5,000 Pinterest Pictures 

 VIEW A Green Road Project (AGRP) Website 

 Email AGRP

RSS Feed 

Subscribe to; A Green Road Project magazine, monthly issues

It is easy to join the AGRP network, and your email will never be rented, sold or shared.

Subscribe/sign up, give feedback, or offer news tips or story ideas by sending an email to agreenroad@gmail.com  . Subscribe by typing the word subscribe in the subject line. 


"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:www.lawcornel.edu/uscode.

Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.


BP Gulf Oil Spill Disaster; Gulf Seafood Radium Levels; Chernobyl Like Radiation in the Gulf of Mexico And In Sea Food, Corexit Health Warning Fossil Fuel Industry And Corexit is Poisoning The Gulf, Marine Life, Workers and Public

Thank you for including the article link when publishing AGR article(s) elsewhere. 

Website  and contact page


A Green Road; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? Support AGR and share this article via by copying and pasting title and url into
TwitterFacebookEmailTumblerRedditStumbleuponPinterestInstagramWordpress and on Buffer

Share this post: