Share this post:
Pro Nuclear Industry Hormesis Theory Promoters At Colleges/Universities, Nuclear Research Facilities Debunked By Dr. Helen Caldicott MD - Professor Wade Allison As Example - 15 Design Flaws In GE Mark 1 Reactors - GE Dirty Secrets Exposed - STOP CALLING MURDER 'SCIENCE'

ALL SCHOOLS, COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES HAVE ANTI FRAUD PLUS ANTI CRIME PROCESSES IN PLACE, IN ORDER TO PROTECT STUDENTS AND THE INSTITUTION ITSELF


Universities and colleges universally are anti-fraud and anti-crime oriented, correct? Educational institutions have built in policies and procedures as well as fraud prevention education programs set up to teach and protect students and educators against fraud of all kinds. This 1 hour video is one example of how educational institutions attempt to protect students against fraud and corruption on campus. So far, so good.

Everyone is for protecting students against fraud and corruption plus deception, wouldn't you agree?
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/8WfcxcDJMqo  56 min

THE GREATEST ENEMY IS NOT IGNORANCE, BUT THE ILLUSION OF KNOWLEDGE, COMBINED WITH ADVANCED DEGREES AND/OR POSITIONS OF POWER AND INFLUENCE, TO FORM A DOGMATIC CULT




Source/credit We Are Humanity

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance. It is the illusion of knowledge 
Stephen W. Hawking
What if there is a deeper layer to deception and fraud on college and university campuses? Would you want to know about it, and warn your children about it? Would you want to warn the campus boards that they are being misled down the primrose path to destruction, chaos, and ruin?

UNIVERSITIES CORRUPTED AND CONTROLLED BY PRO NUCLEAR INDUSTRY MARKETING AND EDUCATION DOLLARS, TO THEIR DETRIMENT, VIA THE BACK END METHOD

Money easily controls and manipulates entire organizations, through injections of cash. The cash comes along with strings, such as requiring a certain 'education' to be taught, which shows nuclear as being green, clean, and safe for example. Once this PR propaganda is taught for several years, the students actually believe it and then go out in public and pronounce it as a sacred truth that cannot be disputed. 

Citizens must get informed, and speak out against the dangerous nuclear industry
But just what is this “nuclear back-end” – the back end of what? Nuclear materials have a wide range of uses, including medical and commercial ones that are distinct from their main uses for power generation and weapons. The vast majority of government expenditures related to nuclear materials goes toward nuclear weapons and military uses (such as naval propulsion systems), and nuclear power. In the United States, virtually all nuclear-related industries and products in the energy and military-application areas are joint operations involving private companies working under government contracts and regulations. The scientific and engineering knowledge required for the nuclear industry means that universities and university-linked research centres play a major role in bringing these two institutions – private companies and government – together. In South Australia, Ben Heard (who is connected to University of Adelaide) is symbolic of this key link connecting networked institutions and elites. 

The precedent for this corporate-government-military-university linkage began with the Manhattan Project of World War II, the massive project that led to the development of the first three atomic bombs: Little Boy (the uranium core Hiroshima bomb), and Trinity (the New Mexico test bomb) and Fat Man (the Nagasaki bomb) that both had plutonium cores. The most important leaders of the Manhattan Project were General Leslie Groves (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) and J. Robert Oppenheimer (theoretical physicist and professor of physics at University of California Berkeley). The bomb was developed in large part developed at Los Alamos Laboratory in New Mexico, but the plutonium core required its own facility at Hanford, in Washington state where over 50,000 workers were hired by DuPont chemical corporation to run the operation. DuPont also was contracted to build the sprauling complex.

Following the end of World War II, the US built hydrogen bombs far beyond the destructive capacity of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs. At the same time, work began on developing nuclear power for supposedly peaceful purposes, what President Eisenhower dubbed the “Atoms for Peace” program – now generally recognized as integral to Cold War propaganda. There’s no denying that nuclear power became a major part of domestic electrical power generation. But the link between nuclear power development and nuclear weapons development continues to the present, even though international use of nuclear power plants for civilian energy use continues. However, the bigger picture is the linkage of these two – via the military-industrial complex that Eisenhower warned about in his famous Farewell Address of 1961.

DEEP STATE NUCLEAR CARTEL COMPRISED OF MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IS BUYING UP UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES IN ORDER TO CORRUPT THEM TERMINALLY AND TO SELL THEM AND THEIR STUDENTS SNAKE OIL; GREED AND POWER MOTIVATES THEM

If one listens to pro nuclear academics, 'regulators' and politicians being paid off by the nuclear industry, huge nuclear disasters are just minor blips, which cause no one any harm, and result in zero deaths, plus no environmental damage. What if this is all just pro corporate nuclear greenwashing? 


No doubt the global nuclear industry is very busily trying to influence academia. The most glaring example of this in the English-speaking world, is the University of Saskatchewan funded by Saskatchewan government and nuclear industry to develop SMRs. Other American examples – University of Missouri, and 29 other universities. In Britain, there’s University College London, Cambridge University’s funding from nuclear weapons industry , University of Bristol ‘s funding from secretive British organisation The Atomic Weapons Establishment. In Japan, it’s civil-military cooperation in Japanese universities. Even inAustralia they set up Adelaide’s University College London (UCL) -pro nuclear research funded by nuclear interests.

USA’s Steven Chu selling nuclear snake oil to the American public
The Department has worked to advance small modular reactors, which provide an important opportunity for America’s manufacturing sector to make and sell cutting-edge technology……Promoting a sustainable nuclear industry in the U.S. also requires cultivating the next generation of scientists and engineers. Over the past three years, the Department has invested $170 million in research grants at more than 70 universities, supporting RandD into a full spectrum of technologies, from advanced reactor concepts to enhanced safety design.

WHAT HAPPENS IF AND WHEN SNAKE OIL IN THE FORM OF DECEPTION, FRAUD AND CRIMINALITY IS BUILT INTO COURSES WITHIN SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES? 


But what happens if a particular kind of fraud or corruption is built into the structure and/or courses of a particular educational institution? How would fraud, deception and/or corruption like this be found? Who would be responsible for finding it, exposing it and then getting rid of it? Is there some kind of mechanism for addressing the subject of institutional fraud or corruption in your educational institution? 

This article addresses scientific deception in educational institutions, and give an example of how the nuclear programs may involve corruption. Details will be provided on how it works, and expose the specifics of how it works, by analyzing several 'theories' that are taught on campus, which actually have no scientific basis to them, and could be considered fraudulent, or at the very least, corrupting to the TRUE scientific process, which is unbiased, verifiable and open to debate by anyone, not just a small closed off group. 

As a first step, let's take a look at the theory of Hormesis, which involves the belief that low dose radiation poses no danger or risk to the public. Does it meet the definition of fraud, deception and /or lying? Dive in and you get to decide. 

DR. HELEN CALDICOTT MD ON HOW THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY DECEIVES, LIES ABOUT DANGERS OF RADIATION AND COVERS UP NUCLEAR DISASTERS

Dr. Caldicott MD; how the nuclear industry misleads, lies and deceives schools, governments, and mass media

ABOUT HELEN CALDICOTT:

The single most articulate and passionate advocate of citizen action to remedy the nuclear and environmental crises, Dr Caldicott, has devoted the last forty two years to an international campaign to educate the public about the medical hazards of the nuclear age and the necessary changes in human behavior to stop environmental destruction.

Born in Melbourne, Australia in 1938, Dr Caldicott received her medical degree from the University of Adelaide Medical School in 1961. She founded the Cystic Fibrosis Clinic at the Adelaide Children’s Hospital in 1975 and subsequently was an instructor in pediatrics at Harvard Medical School and on the staff of the Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Boston, Mass., until 1980 when she resigned to work full time on the prevention of nuclear war.

In 1971, Dr Caldicott played a major role in Australia’s opposition to French atmospheric nuclear testing in the Pacific; in 1975 she worked with the Australian trade unions to educate their members about the medical dangers of the nuclear fuel cycle, with particular reference to uranium mining.

While living in the United States from 1977 to 1986, she played a major role in re-invigorating as President, Physicians for Social Responsibility, an organization of 23,000 doctors committed to educating their colleagues about the dangers of nuclear power, nuclear weapons and nuclear war. On trips abroad she helped start similar medical organizations in many other countries. The international umbrella group (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War) won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985. She also founded the Women’s Action for Nuclear Disarmament (WAND) in the US in 1980.

Returning to Australia in 1987, Dr Caldicott ran for Federal Parliament as an independent. Defeating Charles Blunt, leader of the National Party, through preferential voting she ultimately lost the election by 600 votes out of 70,000 cast.

She moved back to the United States in 1995, where she lectured at the New School for Social Research on the Media, Global Politics and the Environment; hosted a weekly radio talk show on WBAI (Pacifica) in New York; and was the Founding President of the STAR (Standing for Truth About Radiation) Foundation on Long Island.

Dr Caldicott has received many prizes and awards for her work, including the Lannan Foundation’s 2003 Prize for Cultural Freedom and twenty one honorary doctoral degrees. She was personally nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Linus Pauling – himself a Nobel Laureate. The Smithsonian has named Dr Caldicott as one of the most influential women of the 20th Century. She has written for numerous publications and has authored seven books. 

Dr Caldicott currently divides her time between Australia and the US where she lectures widely. In year 2001, she founded the US-based Nuclear Policy Research Institute (NPRI), which became Beyond Nuclear. Currently, Dr Caldicott is President of The Helen CaldicottFoundation/NuclearFreePlanet.or­g, which initiates symposiums and other educational projects to inform the public and the media of the dangers of nuclear power and weapons. The mission of the Foundation is education to action, and the promotion of a nuclear-energy and weapons-free, renewable energy powered, world.

The Foundation’s most recent symposium, co-sponsored by Physicians for Social Responsibility was held at the New York Academy of Medicine in March 2013, 2013. It was entitled The Medical and Environmental Consequences of Fukushima helencaldicottfoundation.org, download at
http://www.totalwebcasting.com/view/?....

Winner, Nuclear-Free Future Lifetime Achievement Award
The world’s leading spokesperson for the antinuclear movement, Dr. Helen Caldicott is the co-founder of Physicians for Social Responsibility, a nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize, and the 2003 winner of the Lannan Prize for Cultural Freedom. Both the Smithsonian Institute andLadies’ Home Journal have named her one of the Most Influential Women of the Twentieth Century. In 2001 she founded the Nuclear Policy Research Institute, which later became Beyond Nuclear, in Washington, D.C. The author of The New Nuclear Danger, War in Heaven(with Craig Eisendrath), Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer, and Loving This Planet and the editor of Crisis Without End (all published by The New Press), she is currently president of the Helen Caldicott Foundation/NuclearFreePlanet.org. She divides her time between Australia and the United States.

In the above video, Dr. Helen Caldicott MD explains the health dangers of low dose radiation. Her views are contrary to the nuclear industry viewpoints and beliefs, as expressed by nuclear pundits and experts at universities funded by the nuclear industry all around the world. Why would a medical professional have the exact opposite viewpoint, when compared to nuclear  researchers and scientists, who are often found on campuses globally?

NUCLEAR INDUSTRY DANGERS, (LATENCY PERIOD) WITH DR HELEN CALDICOTT MD


The Nuclear Danger with Dr. Helen Caldicott MD (2/7)
Dr. Helen Caldicott: Conference on THE NUCLEAR DANGER: Nuclear War and Nuclear Power

Sponsored by the Centre for Research on Globalization

The single most articulate and passionate advocate of citizen action to remedy the nuclear and environmental crises, Dr Helen Caldicott, has devoted the last 38 years to an international campaign to educate the public about the medical hazards of the nuclear age and the necessary changes in human behavior to stop environmental destruction.

In the words of Dr. Caldicott, "When I first heard about the reactor damage at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan, I knew the prognosis: If any of the containment vessels or fuel pools exploded, it would mean millions of new cases of cancer in the Northern Hemisphere.

Many advocates of nuclear power would deny this. During the 25th anniversary last week of the Chernobyl disaster, some commentators asserted that few people died in the aftermath, and that there have been relatively few genetic abnormalities in survivors' offspring. It's an easy leap from there to arguments about the safety of nuclear energy compared to alternatives like coal, and optimistic predictions about the health of the people living near Fukushima.

But this is dangerously ill informed and short-sighted; if anyone knows better, it's doctors like me."

For more information:

DR JANETTE SHERMAN MD: A MEDICAL DOCTOR REVEALS DANGERS OF CHRONIC, CUMULATIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE

Dr. Janette Sherman MD explores and explains the dangers of low dose radiation on fetuses and infants in the video.
Video; https://youtu.be/8aUsf0cCn-Q 7 min.

She is also an expert about nuclear radiation, but she and Dr. Caldicott MD deal with kids, infants, sperm, eggs and fetuses, not cold, dead man made radioactive material, which is all that most nuclear experts deal with on a daily basis. Who are you going to listen to, when it comes to the negative health effects on children or infants of chronic, cumulative man made radiation?

The nuclear experts who don't have to measure radiation in children or deal with the negative health effects as physicians, all say that radiation is 'safe' in just about any amount except for acute doses received, such as being close to ground zero of a nuclear bomb attack.

But the doctors and epidemiologists who measure, analyze and treat people, like Dr. Caldicott and others, say the opposite. According to the research they have done, no amount of radiation is safe, and infants are much more at risk from even minute amounts of radiation that may not affect a healthy adult.

Could this hint at a reason why there is such a disparity of beliefs between these two groups?

Of course, since only pro nuclear professors and researchers are allowed on campuses, they teach that radiation is safe, children will not be harmed and that man made nuclear energy is the same as bananas, which is nothing more than fraud and lying.

HOT PARTICLES CAN CAUSE DEFORMITIES, DISEASE OR CANCER


Dr. Caldicott explains that just one 'hot' particle of plutonium or uranium, or cesium, or strontium, or one of 1,200 other radioactive decay daughters can cause birth defects, or health issues/death from one of 2,000 genetic diseases. The nuclear industry claims this is not possible, at all, ever. They further claim no one has died from this, nor gotten sick from any 'hot' particles that the nuclear industry produces. 

Now let's explore why the public runs into two different and opposing belief systems. Did you know that scientific nuclear related research and reporting can be full of fraud and/or corrupting influence of industry money, and much of it cannot be relied upon, especially when it comes to radiation? What happens when money donated to a college or university has strings attached to it? 

WHAT IS THE 'RETURN' ON INVESTMENT FROM NUCLEAR INDUSTRY INVESTMENTS IN COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES? THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY WANTS HORMESIS THEORY PROMOTED IN ALL SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES

NRC Grants and scholarships for colleges and universities
http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/grants/awards/2013/

What do you want to bet that these courses all teach students and instructors all about the hormesis theory and how great it is, that no man made radiation hurts anyone, and no one ever died in any nuclear accident? 

Jebus December 4, 2014 "Nuclear weapons research body gives £8m a year to British universities. A report due out on Wednesday exposes the extent of links between the Atomic Weapons Establishment and universities. AWE funds six professorships, named after its first director, Sir William Penney, at five universities. Two are at Cranfield, one at Cambridge, one at Bristol, one at Heriot-Watt and one at the University of Edinburgh. Other universities that benefited substantially included Southampton, Surrey, Bath, University College London, Oxford, Birmingham, Warwick, Loughborough, Leicester, Manchester, Liverpool, Strathclyde, Edinburgh, St Andrews and Queen's in Belfast.

US colleges and universities are no different from the ones in the UK. Here is a very long list of educational institutions with links to the nuclear industry. How much money is exchanged?  
http://www.nei.org/Careers-Education/Education-Resources/Nuclear-Energy-Training-Education-Programs

Even if there is nothing in writing, is the nuclear industry really so benevolent, that they will not 'influence' professors in a way that disposes them to produce a favorable research report? What happens to the professors if they do NOT support the nuclear industry 100%, in public and also issue public statements of denial of any harm from radiation? The problem with receiving money from an industry is that there are almost always strings attached, particularly so with the nuclear industry. 

Sickputer March 2, 2015  "Higley is a product of the nucleoape system and a year earlier than the 2013 article you cited, she had this to say: "…. “But researchers from all over the world are contributing information on innovative ways to help this area recover, including some lessons learned from the much more serious Chernobyl accident in 1986 in the Ukraine.”

SP: Much more serious? How's that working out for you Kathy? Knowing you have been 100% wrong since 311 began? But her university is sucking hard at the radioactive money teat of the DoE and has been since 1958: "Oregon State University recently received six awards from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) totaling $3,526,245. Distributed by the Energy Department’s Nuclear Energy University Programs (NEUP), the money will be used for nuclear energy research and infrastructure improvement within OSU’s Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics (NERHP) and Radiation Center." "Overall, the DOE awarded $67 million for nuclear technology infrastructure upgrades and research and development projects at universities and laboratories across the nation."

WHAT HAPPENS IF COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY PEER REVIEW PROCESS IS CORRUPTED BY PRO HORMESIS PROMOTERS?


Let's say that a particular college or university has a scientific research and publishing effort, which is part of a peer reviewed network. What happens if that peer review process is corrupted and full of fraud? Who investigates this? Who exposes it? Who charges the participants with a crime? Who will shut down or get rid of the fraudulent research and fire those who were organizing the conspiracy of fraud? What will the effect be on the educational institution if the fraud is allowed to continue and fester inside of the institution that is supposed to be dedicated to a pursuit of truth? 

If a whistleblower comes forward and exposes fraud at a college or university, how will the college or university respond? Here is the story of one such whistleblower and the university response. Maybe a lesson can be learned by everyone from this very sad story of a true whistleblower, who ended up committing suicide due to lack of support from anyone. When the truth is not supported by a major college, what does that say about the educational system, much less the media and the government that hounded him for no reason? 

NON SCIENTIFIC RELIGIOUS TYPES OF DOGMA AND TABOOS ARE PRESENT IN MANY COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES AROUND NUCLEAR ANYTHING, DUE TO INDUSTRY ASSOCIATED PRO HORMESIS PROMOTERS


humptydumpty April 1, 2015  "To find the culprit, look to the curriculum and course content at major universities, which are partially funded by wealthy donors whose financial interests include nuclear weapons, power and/or "defense" industries that feed off of them.

The academic taboo forbidding any scientific criticism of nuclear technology pervades not only science education, but also engineering, business, law, finance, etc. That is why professionals in many government  non-governmental agencies are "baffled" — it is because they have been carefully programmed to disregard any reference to deleterious effects of radiation.

This is equivalent to the entire program of study in Economics, where "conventional wisdom" ignores the mountain of evidence showing that growth-based unregulated capitalism is the road to ruin, because it disregards the negative consequences (externalities). One glaring piece of evidence is right in their midst: student loan debt!"

KELP WATCH SET UP TO DECEIVE/COVER UP FUKUSHIMA EFFECTS; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY LOVES TO FINANCE AND CONTROL THE PRO HORMESIS 'EXPERTS', ESPECIALLY AT UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES


How about placing a nuclear physicist, Kai Vetter, employed by the nuclear weapons industry to be in charge of the nuclear safety program, Kelp Watch (to check for effects of Fukushima radiation on west coast kelp)? “Kai Vetter is a Professor-in-Residence of Nuclear Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley and Head of the Applied Nuclear Physics (ANP) program in the Nuclear Science Division of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Professor Vetter’s main research interests are in the development and demonstration of new concepts and technologies in radiation detection to address some of the outstanding challenges in fundamental sciences, nuclear security, and health.” He is also involved with “homeland security” and “medical physics, new means in the verification of ion-cancer therapy” (12).

Hmmmm, isn't there a wee bit of conflict of interest there? Maybe this kind of person deserves further scrutiny and investigation. Maybe whatever is said or claimed by this person needs to be questioned deeply, and financing/money/power connections need to be fleshed out in detail, in order to see all of the potential 'bias' or favoritism towards a particular industry, such as the military or nuclear industry for example. How can a promoter of the nuclear industry also be the watchdog and monitor/whistleblower?

JAY CULLEN SCIENTIFIC PRO NUCLEAR HORMESIS JUNK SCIENCE EXPOSED

Here is another example of what happens when junk hormesis science is allowed at a college or university.

UVic Gives Jay Cullen $630,000 
In a now (deleted/censored) video Jay Cullen goes so far as to say that Fukushima had NO meltdowns, no meltouts, no spent fuel pool fires and that radiation in the ocean is 1,000 times BELOW the 'natural' levels. In other words, Fukushima was a non event, and nothing happened there; no radiation was released AT ALL. 

For more on why video was deleted and author was arrested, go to; 

Rense; "Dr. Jay Cullen, oceanic chemist, is editor of the Fukushima Inform website (which received 630,000 dollars in funding from Meopar, whose most important board member is a CEO in the nuclear industry) and is employed at the University of Victoria in Canada: “[C]hemical oceanographer Jay Cullen is leading the formation of a new marine radioactivity monitoring network that will engage scientists in Canada and the US, health experts, non-governmental organizations—and citizen scientists along the British Columbia coast.... The Integrated Fukushima Ocean Radionuclide Monitoring Network (InFORM) is being funded by $630,000 over three years by the Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network (MEOPAR)” (20).

An article written by Jay Cullen at Fukushima Inform entitled “Comparing 20th Century Strontium and Cesium Isotopes From Atmospheric Weapons Testing in the Pacific to Fukushima Sources” (24) predictably relies on the pro-nuclear bodies, the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The UN sources cannot be considered politically neutral as they are being pushed and pulled in every direction by interested power players (25).

WHEN COVER UP BECOMES THE FOCUS OF THE WHOLE INDUSTRY, THAT INVOLVES TERMINAL CORRUPTION, FRAUD AND CRIMINALITY AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS AND SYSTEMIC DEFECTS WHICH ARE TERMINAL


A much deeper example of how nuclear experts paid by the industry see things very differently experts who have no such connections is the Fukushima mega nuclear disaster. According to industry connected 'experts', nothing really bad happened. 

Even TEPCO admitted three months after 3/11, that at least 3 full melt downs happened. Jay is telling revisionist history as part of the pro nuclear apologist club, and he is a very good example of how pro nuclear 'experts' come out of the woodwork and deny nuclear accidents caused any negative effects, no matter what happened, even inside of educational institutions, where scientific truth is supposed to be pursued and reached for.

The pro nuclear apologists like Jay who staff the educational community make outrageous claims, such as no one died from Fukushima and no one will ever die from it. Of course, the mass media features their point of view, and no one is there to refute these claims, despite there being no actual evidence to support this claim.

Let's assume best case that Jay is deluding himself and that is ok. Everyone has a right to believe whatever they want (the Earth is flat, sun orbits around Earth, Earth is stationary in middle of universe), but he should not be allowed to say these things on air or in the college classroom without at least someone there, who is allowed to debate him and to challenge the hormesis theory.

Most if not all of the time however, there is no one on the other side, and this hormesis quackery is allowed to go unchallenged into the minds of millions of listeners or viewers, who are told that this is the 'expert' on radiation and all things nuclear.

The hormesis theory that no one is hurt by radiation has been disputed and debunked by the radium story, via the link below...

MORE ABOUT JAY CULLEN; WHY IS HE HIDING HIS CONNECTION AND FUNDING BY THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY?


Vancouver Aquarium’s Radioactive Cover-Up
In his introduction Jay Cullen did not reveal that the nuclear industry is one of the funding sources for his research. It is outrageous that the Board Chair for Meopar, the organization that oversees Cullen’s research on this issue, is also the president and CEO of Canadian Nuclear Laboratories:
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/09/vancouver-aquariums-radioactive-cover-up.html

When a professor teaching at a college and giving lectures to the public about the safety of nuclear power  and that nothing bad happened at a mega nuclear accident, is also being PAID or SUPPORTED by the nuclear industry, wouldn't it make common sense to require that they say this BY LAW?

The very fact that this financial arrangement exists, should change the thinking in many peoples minds about him and what he says, because there is a built in conflict of interest. Cullen is in much the same position as the IAEA, which is a marketing PR agency for the nuclear industry, but it also claims to be a 'regulator' on an international level. How can a PR agency also be an effective 'regulator' or in the case of Cullen, an impartial nuclear 'expert'?

Secret power connections, secret money sources, and secret connections to the industry that they promote and/or protect, are a feature that is commonly found among hormesis promoters. 

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES ARE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY, BIASED TOWARDS SELLING NUCLEAR AS THE SOLUTION FOR EVERYTHING, AND THAT NOTHING BAD EVER HAPPENS


The pro nuclear colleges and universities are funded by the nuclear industry, and/or by pro nuclear groups. Here is one example of how a private corporation is funding MIT, which then comes out with a statement that nothing happened at Fukushima, just the same as Jay above. The researchers, scientists and college/university experts are all bought and paid for with industry money. If they dare to say anything negative, they are thrown out and blacklisted. 

TEPCO funds chair/professsorship at MIT — Nuclear researcher: “Nuclear researchers have a stake in reassuring the pubic that nothing bad is happening
http://enenews.com/tepco-funds-chairprofesssorship-at-mit-nuclear-researcher-nuclear-researchers-have-a-stake-in-reassuring-the-pubic-that-nothing-bad-is-happening

We Not They Finally October 17, 2014 "Kai Vetter of the UC Berkeley Dept of Nuclear Engineering is amongst the worst of the worst. From the start, it was that university, and that department, running the supposed-to-be scary notices about "who is behind enenews?" and all about "fear-mongering." These are despicable people who use their knowledge and position to destroy others."

IAEA IS A PR MARKETING FIRM FOR THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY, BUT ALSO ASSUMES THE ROLE OF 'REGULATOR'; HOW DOES THAT WORK IN REALITY?


The IAEA is in fact nothing more than a marketing arm of the nuclear industry, but in the mass media, it is presented as an impartial and neutral protector of public health. Nothing could be further from the truth.

ATOMS FOR PEACE MONEY SENT TO COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES CONVERTS THEM INTO PRO NUCLEAR WAR INDUSTRY SUPPORTERS

The nuclear industry provides a large amount of money via an 'Atoms For Peace' campaign to colleges and universities all around the world. The money helps educational institutions 'view' nuclear weapons, nuclear war and the military industrial complex in a 'positive' light. 

Combat and the Campus - Nuclear weapons research at Britain's universities
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/r_va-bKDfQQ  1 hour

A discussion on the ethics of university research and nuclear weapons with Jonathon Porritt, Andy Blowers, Christopher Watson, and David McCoy. Held at University College London on 12 February 2014 to mark the launch of the 'Atoms for Peace?' report published by Nuclear Information Service and Medact. More information: www.tinyurl.com/awescience

HISTORY OF ATOMS FOR PEACE PROGRAM BEGAN WITH PROPAGANDA PUT OUT BY DISNEYLAND TV SHOW AND RIDES


The history of the atoms for peace movement began way back with Disneyland and their atoms for peace TV show, which presented a fairy tale world filled with nuclear everything. Disneyland was founded on money given to them by a combination of a pro nuclear mass media corporation and the military industrial complex. 

DOES ATOMS FOR PEACE MONEY ON CAMPUS ENHANCE LONG TERM SECURITY AND SAFETY, OR DOES IT DO THE OPPOSITE?


What are the implications of an educational institution promoting and supporting nuclear war and the nuclear war making industrial complex? Nuclear power plants are after all, nothing more than a nuclear weapons making factory, producing the ingredients to make nuclear bombs. Every hour that a nuclear reactor is fissioning, it is making more nuclear weapons materials and increasing the risk of nuclear war, or nuclear disaster. 

20 CLOSE CALLS SO FAR. HOW MANY MORE CAN HUMANITY GET AWAY WITH?


Do nuclear weapons really promote the long term (7 generations) 'security' and/or safety of a particular nation that possesses those weapons and/or nuclear power plants? Does producing the nuclear weapons fuel and then spent fuel enhance security and safety, or does it do the opposite?

CIA LEADING THE SECRET WAR FOR PEOPLE'S MINDS AND HEARTS, SUPPRESSING ANYONE AND ANYTHING THAT IS CONTRARY TO PRO NUCLEAR INDUSTRY PR CAMPAIGN


If an educational institution comes the conclusion that nuclear weapons, spent fuel, nuclear waste and nuclear power plants do NOT promote the long term safety and security of a nation, then how does that tie in with promoting the industry responsible for all of this via accepting their money for training, education, research and development? How does an educational institution justify siding with the military industrial complex that is controlled and led by a secretive, unaccountable and death affirming organizations? 

SCIENTIFIC FRAUD IS RAMPANT IN RESEARCH PAPERS, PARTICULARLY IN THE AREA OF NUCLEAR RADIATION HORMESIS THEORY

Accepting money for nuclear industry research has other implications as well. The temptation is to come up with a result that favors the industry, because that is where the money comes from. At what point does bias in this way become outright corruption and fraud? At what point are ethics and morals thrown out completely, just to get the money?

Scientific bias and/or fraud because it is tied to the money source that expects a certain favorable view or outcome is rampant not just on mass media news reports, as we illustrated above, it is also rampant in peer reviewed and other research papers.

Scientific fraud is now rampant in research papers:
http://www.naturalnews.com/041592_scientific_fraud_research_papers_junk_science.html

Via Jebus July 31, 2014 "The Education Delusion…
In science, we use precise terminology to describe specific, observable phenomena. The constant discovery of new organisms, organelles and organic compounds necessitates an ever-expanding vocabulary. Academics in certain other disciplines seem to use highly specific jargon to disguise their lack of new ideas or even the absence of any sort of logic.
https://ukiahcommunityblog.wordpress.com/2014/07/17/the-education-delusion-2/

THE PROBLEM WITH SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW PANELS IS THAT THEY CAN EASILY LOCK OUT THE TRUTH TELLERS


Whoa, now I see it. It's a hologram of a nuclear family…"

Have you ever tried to figure out the language that nuclear scientists speak? Have you ever tried to translate one radiation dose announced by the nuclear experts, into something you can understand? There are dozens of ways of describing doses of radiation, and dozens of words to describe the same thing. Most people get lost with one description, never mind 10 or more. Because the public gets confused easily, they give up and trust these scientific and medical 'experts' to keep them 'safe'. 

WHAT NEGATIVE ETHICAL EFFECT DOES THE MONEY SOURCE HAVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, ITS BRAND AND IT'S FUTURE?


Who is responsible on campus to review the ethical implications for the money connections and the outcomes, as well as the future risks that are a consequence of that? How important is truth and ethics, compared to just getting money and who cares what is published and how it affects things? The story of Aaron Swartz serves as an important lesson in this regard. 

If taking money from criminals and terrorists is ok for an educational institution, what does that say about the institution?

Are there any moral standards or ethical considerations involved in accepting money from whatever source? 

WHAT ARE THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ACCEPTING MONEY FROM THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, WHICH IS THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY? 

Atoms for Peace? The Atomic Weapons Establishment and UK universities
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/8s4UBr1Tv3s  2 min

What are the ethics around research links between the Atomic Weapons Establishment, where the UK's nuclear weapons are designed and made, and universities or colleges all around the world? Features Jonathon Porritt (Forum for the Future), Andrew Blowers (Open University), Christopher Watson (British Pugwash Group), and David McCoy (Medact

PROFESSOR ALLISON CLAIMS HE NEVER GOT MONEY FROM THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY, NOR HAS HE EVER BEEN A PART OF THE INDUSTRY


Jebus December 4, 2014 He has proposed new limits as high as 100mSv for a single dose or as a monthly maximum, and 5000 mSv as a lifetime exposure. Professor Allison said he supported nuclear energy as part of the solution to climate change but was not part of the industry and had never accepted work or money from it.

It is strange that he claims to not be part of the nuclear industry, when his wiki entry is full of his nuclear industry experience. The nuclear industry funds the Oxford nuclear program and sponsors conferences there.  

OXFORD UNIVERSITY NUCLEAR FUNDING BOMBSHELL

Jebus December 4, 2014 "Oxford’s nuclear funding bombshell, Amelia Hamer 13/02/2014
Oxford University has received over half a million pounds in funding from a nuclear weapons organisation over a two year period. According to a report launched by the Nuclear Information Service and Medact yesterday, the Atomic Weapons Establishment gave the University £532,291 between 2010 and July 2012. The Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) is responsible for the design, manufacture and support of warheads for the United Kingdom’s nuclear deterrent. The organisation is a private consortium which runs two nuclear development facilities in Berkshire on behalf of the Ministry of Defence. As well as providing funding for science research, AWE has been known to sponsor conferences held at Oxford, including the “Institute of Physics Plasma Physics Group Annual Conference”, held in April 2012.

DR ALLISON IS A HORMESIS THEORY PROMOTER, THE SAME AS ANN COULTER, JAY CULLEN AND OTHER NUCLEAR EXPERTS 


Could this amount of money and influence have anything to do with the fact that Dr. Wade Allison, Emeritus Professor of Physics at Oxford University, while saying he receives NO FUNDS from the nuclear industry also claims that Fukushima is only 1% of Chernobyl, or that 100 times the previous maximum 1 m/Sv/yr for civilians is now 'safe', or that the effect of man made heavy metal radiation contamination of foods and drinks is the same as sunshine or oxygen? 

Allison at the Institute of Physics: New safety levels for human radiation exposure are suggested… 100 mSv in total in any month; 5,000 mSv as a total of whole-of-life exposure.

Oxford Professor in Japan: Well so what if Fukushima had triple meltdown? People enjoy effects of radioactive contamination; Sunshine is much more dangerous; Effect of radiation same as oxygen — Former WHO Official: “The man is dangerous… He’s a crank” (VIDEOS)
http://enenews.com/oxford-professor-japan-triple-meltdown-fukushima-people-enjoy-effects-radioactive-contamination-groundwater-sunshine-dangerous-nuclear-radiation-same-effect-oxygen-former-radiation-expert-man-dange/

WHAT IS THE HORMESIS THEORY? PROMOTERS CLAIM THAT ALL IONIZING RADIATION AND HEAVY METAL RADIOACTIVE POISONS ARE ACTUALLY GOOD FOR HEALTH AND THAT EVERYONE SHOULD CONSUME MORE OF THEM


Wade Allison on video; http://youtu.be/iKtKPSDRClA
He claims that radiation is good for you, so he wrote a book about it and talked to the public about it. he claimed no one needed to be evacuated after the 3 meltdowns and everyone should keep eating local food and drinks, with no restrictions, no decontamination needed. 

Wade Allison on video; http://youtu.be/5qPqMANB7Cw In this video he claims that the fear of radiation is the problem, not the radiation itself. The only thing to fear is economics and social conditions, not man made radiation contamination or nuclear accidents. 

PlowboyGrownUP December 4, 2014 AUGSBURG, Germany, December 1, 2014 /PRNewswire/ –
(Wade Allison in this article)
• Environmentalists demand renaissance of nuclear power
• Nuclear power emits less CO2 than solar power
MAXATOMSTROM launches Germany's first nuclear power plan at the start of the UN Climate Change Conference in Lima, Peru. The plan consists solely of nuclear power which leaves a smaller carbon footprint than solar power. MAXATOMSTROM demands a nuclear renaissance in Germany. Kerry Emanuel – Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT, Wade Allison – Emeritus Professor of Physics at Oxford University, Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore, Physics Nobel Laureate Burton Richter and several other reputable scientists and environmentalists support this demand. 

DEBUNKING DR ALLISON, POINT BY POINT


Via or-well December 4, 2014 Debunking Dr. Wade Allison

More debunking of Wade Allison

Jebus December 4, 2014  Are The Nuclear Experts Wrong? We May Have Everything To Worry About Fukushima Radiation
We are grateful to Prof Christopher Busby, a British scientist known for his work on the health effects of ionising radiation, for his response to the ATCA 5000 briefings on the Fukushima nuclear crisis in Japan. He writes: So what about Wade Allison? Wade is a medical physics person and a professor at Oxford. I have chosen to pitch into him since he epitomises and crystallises for us the arguments of the stupid physicist. In this he has done us a favour, since he is really easy to shoot down. All the arguments are in one place. Stupid physicists?

Make no mistake, physicists are stupid. They make themselves stupid by a kind of religious belief in mathematical modelling. The old Bertie Russell logical positivist trap. And whilst this may be appropriate for examining the stresses in metals, or looking at the Universe (note that they seem to have lost 90% of the matter in the Universe, so-called “dark matter”) it is not appropriate for, and is even scarily incorrect when, examining stresses in humans or other lifeforms.

Via Risky December 4, 2014 "The article says actual power from nuclear energy is “very tiny, if it exists at all” and refers to study by John J. Berger that states: “the nuclear power ‘generation’ industry actually consumed five times as much power as it generated.”
[2] Berger, John J. Nuclear Power: The Unviable Option (Ramparts Press, 1976), cited in Curtis, Richard, Elizabeth Hogan and Shel Horowitz, Nuclear Lessons: An Examination of Nuclear Power’s Safety, Economic, and Political Record (Stackpole Books, 1980), p. 90.

Wade Allison's book review; his outrageous claims debunked
http://iopscience.iop.org/0952-4746/30/2/B01/pdf/0952-4746_30_2_B01.pdf

Feel free to adjust wording on his Wikipedia profile to add in the above debunking articles, in order to make his entry more fair and balanced of course. 

Uranium_Mountain December 4, 2014 Here is the liar's Facebook page: Don't forget to "comment" on his articles. Lmao  https://www.facebook.com/wade.allison.71?fref=ts


SCIENTISTS, BIOLOGISTS AND OTHER EXPERTS MIX UP EVIDENCE, FACTS, AND BOGUS THEORIES; PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE, MASS MEDIA NEVER CHALLENGES ANY OF IT


Radio July 13, 2014 This is Mel Acheson speaking about how scientists fool themselves into confusing evidence, facts, and theories. It's brilliant. This is what I think is happening at WIPPS and the nuclear industry in general right from the start. Yes, greed, corruption, sociopathology all play in because they play in wherever there is power or money to be had. But, what moves the science? We must ask this and understand it. The kitty litter headline has successfully reframed the issue – the danger is not the waste, not the salt mine, not the transport, not the leaking. The danger is the organic kitty litter. This is like saying the danger is standing in the trajectory of a bullet fired from a gun.

But, the danger is actually the bullet and the gun and the shooter, not where one stands, though standing there may be unwise. We tend to say that such a behavior is dangerous. It is incorrect. THAT is foolish or hapless. The danger is the source of the harm. This has been the nuclear excuse for decades. It was the earthquake, the flood, the construction, age, the vibration, the tanks, the drums, the kitty liter and never, never the nuclear materials themselves.

HOW SCIENCE AND NUCLEAR SCIENCE IN PARTICULAR, CAN LOSE ITS WAY

How science can lose it's way
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/mE09IwQUV2k  4 min



NUCLEAR SCIENCE HAS LOST IT'S WAY AND IS NOT TERMINALLY CORRUPTED, BY PROMOTING HORMESIS AND RADIOPHOBIA THROUGH CAPTIVE AGENCIES, MARKETERS AND TOOTHLESS REGULATORS


Science can lose it's way. And if it does lose it's way, how does an educational institution figure this out? How does an educational institution then either get it back on track or distance itself from the 'cult' of true believers in some bogus belief system that has no basis in reality, such as the hormesis and radiophobia theories that the nuclear community promote on campuses all around the world, just as two examples? 

If an educational institution promotes and supports these bogus theories and teaches them in what are labeled as 'nuclear science' courses on campus, what does that say about the educational institution and it's leaders? What appearance does that give to the scientific and educational brand? 

Cults have no problem believing in and teaching things that have almost zero scientific credibility or evidence, such as the Earth is only 2,000 years old, that humans walked with dinosaurs, and that the sun revolves around a stationary Earth. Hopefully, educational institutions allow these topics in a classroom, but make sure that students understand that these theories have no logical or scientific credibility because the evidence does not support them.

Debates can even be conducted around this subject, as part of teaching students to think for themselves. But the bigger question is, should the theories of Creation, Hormesis and Radiophobia be allowed to be taught on campus? Do they meet the standards of scientific rigor and qualification? Should the flat earth theory be allowed to be taught in a college or university? If yes, then that theory meets the same qualifications as the hormesis theory. 

NUCLEAR SCIENTIFIC, REGULATORY AND EDUCATION COMMUNITY IS CONTROLLED BY THE FOR PROFIT INDUSTRY  WITH MONEY AND REVOLVING DOORS


More to the point, the whole nuclear scientific community both inside of educational institutions and outside of them is 'controlled' by the money flowing to them. These scientists and researchers are universally told what to publish, how to research things, and what the final report will say. They also get 'muzzled' and told NOT to speak to the press, or to anyone else for that matter, especially if what they know or find out via their research would 'harm' the nuclear industry. 

Don’t talk to media about your research, scientist says she was told by Ottawa The Canadian Press
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/dont-talk-media-research-scientist-says-she-told-184307685.html

VanneV June 8, 2014 Concerns Over Measurement of Fukushima Fallout

By DAVID MCNEILL | THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION MARCH 16, 2014
“…The pressure he felt is not unusual — only his decision to speak about it. Off the record, university researchers in Japan say that even now, three years after the triple meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, they feel under pressure to play down the impact of the disaster. Some say they cannot get funds or university support for their work. In several cases, the professors say, they have been obstructed or told to steer clear of data that might cause public concern.’…”
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/17/world/asia/concerns-over-measurement-of-fukushima-fallout.html

Via DisasterInterpretationDissorder October 17, 2014 " University links to nuclear weapons maker ‘worth £8 million a year’
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/university-links-to-nuclear-weapons-maker-worth-8-million-a-year/2011307.article

MASS MEDIA TIE IN WITH UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES JUNK NUCLEAR SCIENCE PROGRAMS


When in doubt, follow the money.

When an education institution makes a decision to accept money from an industry that has no ethics, morals or impartial open scientific truth in it, (such as the nuclear industry) it then automatically and without any effort becomes corrupted and biased. Despite saying that it is 'neutral', once a college or university accepts money from a source like that, they become part of the problem, not the solution. Once this very low standard of teaching nuclear cult beliefs is in place, the consequences and blowback start affecting the whole educational industry.

The professors and researchers get air time on the mass media, because almost universally, they are controlled by the nuclear industry as well. So in effect, there is a massive and corrupting influence on the scientific process going on as the pro nuclear forces get sole and unlimited access to the media, as the truth tellers are squashed, suppressed, attacked, and held outside the media spotlight.

SCIENTISTS GET FUNDING CUT OFF IF THEY REVEAL STUDIES THAT 'HARM' THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY, EVEN IF TRUE


Dr. Gofman has been unpopular at the Times since 1970, when the AEC cut off his funding at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, where he was associate director, because he refused to keep secret his predictive studies of the health and environmental effects of low-level radiation from U.S. nuclear power programs. When the AEC withdrew support from Gofman, colleagues told him he was lucky he wasn’t being sent to Siberia. In a sense he was.
https://mariannewildart.wordpress.com/category/sellafield-contamination-incident/

If you follow this line of information and dive deeper in any direction you care to research, you will find that there is a glowing green wall of silence around the dangers of low dose radiation, at any scientific lab or university and more specifically at any lab or college/university teaching anything to do with nuclear. The only exceptions, such as Dr. Gofman, have been fired or lost their funding, so they are no longer part of the closed door good old boy nuclear club, which accepts only members who toe the nuclear party line. Their glowing line is always the point that all radiation is harmless and has no effects in low doses, just like bananas or air plane flights.

Does this sound scientific to you? Whatever happened to the pursuit of truth, and letting the chips fall where they may? Isn't this what universities and colleges are supposed to be all about? It seems that these days, universities and colleges are more about following the money, and squelching the truth.

OFFICIAL WHOLE BODY RADIATION STUDY ANALYZED

Now let's dive into just ONE 'official' Tokyo University study around the Fukushima disaster and pull it apart to see how well it stands up to more than a brief one paragraph mention in most mass media news outlets. 

Official Nuclear Radiation Study; Tokyo University
Hayno, R.S., et al (2013) Internal Radiocesium Contamination of Adults and Children 7 to 20 Months After the Fukushima NPP Accident as Measured by Extensive Whole-Body-Counter Surveys, Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser B, 4, 157-163

30,000 people were given a whole body radiation scan, and the conclusion from this team of supposed nuclear 'experts', scientists and professors was that no radioactive cesium was found in 99% of the residents living close to the Fukushima ground zero nuclear plant. (Thus, no one was harmed, and no one will die from radiation as a result of Fukushima. This is also why the government is saying everything is back to normal, and people can move back into areas right around Fukushima.)

Fumikazu Asai (2013, April 11) Study: No radioactive cesium in 99% of Fukushima, Ibaraki residents

However, this supposed scientific 'study' or research has severe problems both in the collection of the data and the conclusion that was reached. There is a computer model axiom that applies here; 'garbage in = garbage out'.

HOW THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY EXPERTS MISLEAD, DECEIVE AND CONFUSE THE PUBLIC


The following links and articles deconstruct the study and show why is it nothing more than very bad, nonscientific nuclear industry propaganda. 

Japanese study heralding no contamination from Fukushima DECONSTRUCTED by Pink Flamingo and Majia here:

These nuclear industry funded 'experts' that were part of this study and set it up concluded there was 'no harmful radiation' detected. They came to this conclusion because 'only' 1% of those tested had cesium levels of 300 Bq/kg or over, out of the 30,000 participants tested.

WHY AS LITTLE AS 10 TO 50 BQ/KG CESIUM IS DANGEROUS TO INFANTS AND CHILDREN


Nuclear scientists and researchers say that 1,200 Bq/kg is ok for food in the US. Meanwhile, in Japan, they say the maximum allowed is 100 Bq/kg, so they export all of their illegal radiation contaminated food to the US where it is legally allowed to sell nuclear waste to be eaten. Why is this?

The only problem with very strange conclusion that 1000 Bq/kg is safe, but only 100 is safe in Japan conclusion is that post Chernobyl studies by independent scientists showed that as little as 10 - 50 Bq/Kg of cesium caused physical lesions in the heart and other organs, plus major diseases and/or death from heart attacks in 100% of children studied. There is no way that a true scientist or medical doctor would call a child 'healthy' with 50 or more Bk/kg of internal cesium radiation, if they are doing anything more than saying the child is alive and breathing. 

As little as 10 Bq/Kg of cesium has been shown to cause physical health problems. How many people in this study had 10Bq/Kg or more? How many of them had health problems that developed after 3/11? No one knows, as that was not allowed to be asked, is our guess.

AGRP estimates that most if not all of those children participating had at least 10Bq/kg of cesium in their whole body scan, indicating they would more than likely experience a negative health effect of some kind. Coming back around to pro nuclear college and universities; what do they allow their professors and researchers to say on TV, newspapers and on radio? Are they held to any standard or can they just spout off junk science and claim it is the absolute truth and no one else should be listened to because they are quacks and frauds?

CESIUM CONCENTRATES IN THE HEART, IT IS NOT DISTRIBUTED EQUALLY TO ALL PARTS OF THE BODY, AS NUCLEAR EXPERTS CLAIM


Another thing to realize is that Cesium CONCENTRATES in certain body organs and glands. So if you take a 100 Bq/Kg level in the heart or in the bones and 'average' it out over the whole body, which most pro nuclear apologists do to make things look better for their industry, that 'average' looks like a lot LESS of a radioactive load than it actually is, when it is concentrated in one or a few small glands or organs.

This study and the nuclear industry in general completely ignores the radiation concentration effect in glands or organs, and focuses instead on the theory that radiation is absorbed 'equally' by all cells of the body. Of course this theory has been proven false, so false that anyone spouting that radiation is always equal in all parts of the body, is putting out pro nuclear industry propaganda.

This means that the basic premise of this supposedly 'scientific' university study is so flawed, that it is completely worthless. In other words, it is garbage, or worse yet, outright propaganda, meant and designed to deceive the whole world.

This study in effect makes up part of the nuclear industry propaganda effort that Fukushima never happened, no one was harmed and here is the scientific 'proof', direct from Tokyo University. The study cannot be disputed in court because it is based on all of these expert 'scientists' at all of these prestigious educational institutions... The problem is that many, if not most or all of these radiation studies are shams, frauds and propaganda at best, designed to make the nuclear industry look good, rather than to discover the TRUTH.

NUCLEAR INDUSTRY CONTROLS WHAT IS TAUGHT AT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 100%


Never mind that the nuclear industry controls what is taught at these universities and colleges. Never mind that the funding received by these same places is tied to the nuclear industry. Why would these scientists sell out like this? For that we have to follow the money, which is the root of all evil.

If for some reason, a study comes out that is even minutely critical of any part of the nuclear industry or any accident, the funding to that nuclear scientist is CUT OFF immediately, or they are fired and can then never work for the industry again, as was the case of Dr. Gofman. Does this sound 'scientific' to you?

Arnie Gunderson worked in the nuclear industry for many years, but if he tried to find work today, it would be impossible, despite his experience and qualifications, because he no longer toes the 'industry' line, so as a result, he will never be hired by any college, university, lab, nuclear plant or other nuclear radiation using facility. He has crossed the glowing green line, and he can never return to the industry he left.

STUDENTS ARE STARTING TO PROTEST AND CONFRONT BOGUS STATEMENTS PUT OUT BY PROFESSORS ON CAMPUS

Students are often at the forefront of change in a positive direction. But what happens when they are ignored, denied, locked out and punished for their views?

bo November 13, 2014  Kyoto University student activists yelling at pronuke professor : STOP CALLING MURDER 'SCIENCE'
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/ImagF4DNlI4

English Subtitles available by clicking 'cc' .

We read in another section of this article how a whistleblower was treated on campus for exposing the truth. Here we see another example of how students who are trying to expose the truth are treated, by being locked out of a nuclear information event, where a pro nuclear medical 'expert' is going to be speaking about how smiling protects a person from radiation and how bananas are the same as strontium, cesium and plutonium man made heavy metal radioactive poisons.

Truth telling and dissent from the pro nuclear PR professors is not allowed on many or most campuses, especially those who promote nuclear power and the nuclear industry. 

ANY NUCLEAR SAFETY OR OTHER EXPERTS WHO SPEAK OUT ABOUT DANGERS OF NUCLEAR RADIATION ARE BLACKLISTED AND ATTACKED


Arnie Gunderson, just like any other nuclear scientist that dares to talk about the dangers of low dose radiation, are put on a permanent black list, so that no one else in the industry will hire them. This is worse than the McCarthy trials, when a black list of those accused of being Communist was developed, and no one would hire them, anywhere in the US. Another example of a blacklisted person is Tedd Weyman...

That 'expert' may even starve to death, because no one else will pay him or give him a job in the nuclear industry. Or, if the funding is not cut off, his contract is not renewed and/or he or she is fired for some other reason, such as unsatisfactory job performance, or 'not a good fit'. This is a description of the stranglehold that the nuclear industry has on scientific researchers that only a few brave souls dare to take on... like those medical doctors above. But as we already pointed out, they get no research money to do their jobs, either from the government, or the nuclear industry.

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES ARE MOSTLY ANTI GLOBAL WARMING, EXCEPT WHEN IT COMES TO NUCLEAR ENERGY

Greenwashing is frowned on at most universities and colleges, where the scientists involved are reporting on exactly what is happening to the climate and tracing it back to human intervention. The greenwashing organizations are controlled and funded by huge corporations, who say that climate change and global warming does not exist, while calling all of the scientists frauds and scammers. 

But for some strange reason, college and universities do exactly the opposite when it comes to nuclear power. Instead of searching for the truth and exposing lies in this arena, educational institutions have bought the lie and are passing it on, which then benefits an industry that emits more global warming materials than the carbon industry by far. In other words, greenwashing for the nuclear industry is the rule at universities and colleges. 

Since anyone bucking the nuclear mafia is fired in the nuclear industry, college and universities are the only bastion of truth left in society, because huge corporations have so much control over government and the mass media. Sadly, pro nuclear McCarthyism and greenwashing is alive and well, all around the world, at all of the colleges and universities teaching nuclear courses, where injecting students with the bogus junk science that these professors teach, is an acceptable part of the nuclear industry PR and curriculum. 

NUCLEAR INDUSTRY DOES NOT TEST FOR SUCH THINGS AS RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION BIO ACCUMULATION UP THE FOOD CHAIN INTO HUMANS


This is also the control method used to make sure that expensive radiation testing equipment is NEVER used for the purpose of protecting public health, monitor fallout, monitor food radiation contamination, or to study the effects on fetuses, babies or infants.

Take a look at all of the holy nuclear club institutions that will never say a critical word against anything nuclear...

MANY STUDIES ARE AVAILABLE THAT SHOW LOW DOSE RADIATION CAUSES HARM, BUT NUCLEAR INDUSTRY REFUSES TO LOOK AT THEM OR PUBLISH THEM

Dr Christopher Busby: Chernobyl-like radiation found in Tokyo

For all of the scientific, medical and other studies that prove that low dose radiation does cause harm, both internally and externally, click on the following links...

Dana goes into long detail about how the nuclear industry lies and deceives people in the video above.
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYZni4GNY3w  1 hour

PRO NUCLEAR PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGNS BEING WAGED VIA THE MASS MEDIA


The nuclear industry promotes the industry propaganda through nuclear education programs in all of the colleges and universities that only very high doses of EXTERNAL radiation can cause harm in any way. They claim that internal radiation at doses up to and including 300 to 1,200 Bq/kg in food cannot do any harm and thus all people contaminated with internal radiation at levels under that, are healthy and well.. This means that according to these paid off nuclear experts, millions of radiation victims around the world cannot blame the nuclear industry for their health problems or take them to court.

These supposed education and scientific nuclear 'experts' support the nuclear industry position in a quid pro quo relationship, which means they receive financial or other perks such as political or other high paying jobs/positions, for giving a certain prearranged outcome or beneficial to the nuclear industry result. The pressure on these 'captured' industries like medical radiation, nuclear education programs, regulators and politicians is immense and does not let up. Anyone who 'slips' and tells the truth is gotten rid of, which keeps everyone else in line. 

All data received is massaged via computer models or 'estimates' to fit this preconceived notion that bears little or no relationship to reality. Those that come up with different conclusions other than what nuclear companies want get their funding cut off, and thus cannot make a living. 

These supposed nuclear industry funded 'experts' draw no distinction between the effects of low dose radiation on mature healthy adults, an egg, sperm, a fetus and small children.

The fact that one almost undetectable nano particle of plutonium inside the body, lodged next to or inside of a cell can have mutagenetic or cancer causing effects on surrounding cells, including an egg or sperm, simply does not register on them. They will not go there. Internal low dose radiation is not acknowledged as a potential source of harm, unless it is registered in massive amounts that will kill a person in a very short period of time.

This ONE university study only measured for extremely high levels of cesium that would mean quick death, but ignored low levels of plutonium, strontium or 100 other toxic and deadly radioactive isotopes that they also could have looked for and found, which cause negative health effects, and long term cancers or death. 

The nuclear industry paid off 'experts' go off in all kinds of directions with their propaganda and claim all kinds of hogwash, such as the following;

In another example of nuclear industry propaganda, a nuclear 'expert' claims that "Fukushima Daichi plant “did amazingly well” — “Performed beyond its best expectations”
http://enenews.com/article-fukushima-daiichi-plant-did-amazingly-well-performed-beyond-its-best-expectations/comment-page-1#comment-349045 website removed

NUCLEAR REACTOR FLAWS AND DEFECTS COVERED UP BY PRO NUCLEAR EXPERTS AND NUCLEAR INDUSTRY


The only problem with this positive 'spin' is that the nuclear industry experts knew very well that these nuclear reactors had a number of FATAL design flaws, such as the following, outlined by PhilliUpNorth via Enenews; 

"15 Design Flaws In GE Mark 1 Reactors

1. Containment Vessel is too small to contain a nuclear meltdown.

2. Torus, added to fix containment issue, failed when molten corium melted through steel pipes.

3. Stack Venting, added to fix containment issue, failed when valves stuck closed during power failure.

4. Zirconium fuel cladding gives off high levels of hydrogen gas that burns when heated by melting fuel.

5. Vapors of zirconium and cesium formed an explosive mixture during a reactor meltdown, destroying the buildings, controls and safety systems in huge hydrogen explosions. 

6. Spent Fuel Pools are located 100' high in the reactor building, making removal of melted fuel nearly impossible in destroyed buildings.

7. MOX fuel is now being used in old, obsolete, worn out nuclear plants, pushing temperatures and pressures higher then the original reactor design, causing failure and criticality explosions. This is what happened in #3 reactor at Fukushima. 

8. Diesel generators, pumps, and fuel tanks vulnerable to tsunami and often don't work, because they are old diesels out of ships and break quickly under a full load.

9. Reactors require electricity to shut down, and they melt down quickly if without power, for even a few hours. This is what happened at Fukushima.

10. Temperature and pressure gauges require electricity to operate. 

11. Without power, control rooms cannot tell what is happening inside reactors. 

12. Without power, operators are powerless (literally) to control reactors. 

13. Mobile backup generators were wrong voltage to connect to switchgear. 

14. Mobile pumps and fire engines do not have enough pressure to get water into the reactors. 

15. Control rods insert from below, and leak molten corium through many holes in the bottom of reactor during a meltdown." 

There are potentially 100-200 additional flaws, weaknesses and/or bad designs in this particular brand of nuclear reactor made by GE. Nuclear engineers quit rather than continue to work on it. But when these flaws and poor designs result in a massive accident, the best that the nuclear experts can do is to say that it 'performed better than it's best expectations'. Maybe they mean to say that they had zero expectations for it, so anything is better than nothing.

Nuclear engineers that worked on this design warned GE about the flaws, but nothing changed. Those that really cared quit rather than to keep working on it and building more plants that they knew would blow up, as Fukushima did, multiple times.

People who care about our future and community keep warning us, but very few people seem to want to listen or care..

GE'S SECRETS EXPOSED


GE's W-end Nuclear Secret 2
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/Tc4cry6Pkow 3 hours

occupytorontotv This is episode #2 of our ongoing series entitled, "GE's W-end Nuclear Secret." ::: In this episode, public meeting #2 draws over 300+ residents who live beside the GE Lansdowne plant (!bk N. Dupont St) & beyond. 

This public meeting follows on the heals of public meeting #1 - the night before at the Gladstone Public Library at Dufferin & Bloor. Opening songs are by the legendary, Raging Grannies. Yarrrr!!! When this meeting ended at 9pm, a march to the GE plant ensued. 

En route, we again attempt to write an anthem tune, "Uranium. Uranium!" to the musical rhythm of the old-Spiderman cartoon theme song, Yarrrr!!! Meanwhile at the GE plant, the Toronto Police had a huge police presence setup with their Field Command Unit vehicle & a battalion of officers - very overkill & unnecessary eh. Speakers included (in-addition to quick speeches by all area Politicians): - 
Angela Bishop (facilitator): Ontario Clean Air Alliance - Amanda Lickers (keynote speaker ::: on the Long Term Effects of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure): she studied Environmental Chemistry at Trent University, and has presented in public tribunal hearings regarding GE-Hitachi Canada and the proposed expansion of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station. - 

Kyra Bell-Pasht (on Environmental Regulation and the work of the CELA): lawyer at the Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA) - Heather Marshall (on Toxins and the Community's Right to Know): has worked in the field of community engagement in the areas of energy, waste and toxics for 5 years at Toronto Environmental Alliance (TEA) - 

Zach NoCameco Ruiter (provided the overall context of GE-Hitachi's Lansdowne Plant); nuclear activist - Paul Dene Simon (addressed the hazards of uranium mining): Justice Counselor with Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto & is a Deneh from English River First Nation in Saskatchewan - 

Roy Brady (on GE's Public Consultation Record): national 'Council of Canadians' board member - Dawn Withers, parent from the community around the GE Lansdowne plant in question Date/time: Thursday, November 15, 2012 ::: recorded live from 7:02 to 10pm 

Place: Davenport-Perth Community Centre @1900 Davenport Rd, Toronto Mtg info ::: http://ge-uraniumsecrettoronto.blogsp... ::: .:. .:. 

NB: The game plan for this whole evening (5:45-7pm in GEWNS#1):: 5:45-6pm - Meet outside GE for a group meet and greet and location identification (1025 Lansdowne), do a "toxic tour" with a geiger-counter eh 6:15pm - 

Walk from GE to 1900 Davenport (on the walk people can talk and get to know each other - we're in this together) 7pm - Public Meeting at 1900 Davenport 9-10pm - March back to GE plant.

When this meeting ended at 9pm, a march to the GE plant ensued. En route, we again attempt to write an anthem tune, "Uranium. Uranium!" to the musical rhythm of the old-Spiderman cartoon theme song, Yarrrr!!! Meanwhile at the GE plant, the Toronto Police had a huge police presence setup with their Field Command Unit vehicle, a battalion of officers - very overkill, unnecessary eh.

20 NUCLEAR REACTORS IN THE US HAVE SAME DESIGN AS FUKUSHIMA, DEFECTIVE AND DANGEROUS, NO LESSONS LEARNED

Little or nothing is done about the 20 plus nuclear reactors of the same design operating in the USA, in order to address the obvious problems found. The companies responsible seem to not be learning the lessons needed from this disaster. 

HUMANITY IS ON COLLISION COURSE; MANY MORE NUCLEAR DISASTERS DEAD AHEAD


Bottom line, human civilization is on a collision course with a catastrophic global nuclear disaster, if humanity does not change the current power structure, which is based on greed and control from the top down. Huge corporations are owned and controlled by a 1% that are acting more like serial psychopaths than human beings with a heart.

This global disaster is being created by the corporate owned nuclear, mass media medical and military industrial complex. Almost all of these corporations operate together in a monopolistic manner; one industry lobby and corporate network supports and contributes to another, while ignoring, denying or covering up their 'sins' of omission and commission performed by each one alone or by acting or omitting data together.

What will it take to change this course that our ship has taken to a disastrous reef, that will eventually tear the bottom out of our civilized world? 

It may help to TELL THE TRUTH, be transparent and WARM HEARTED. Forgive everyone, and do not be attached to power and money. These things you cannot take with you. 

Let's finish with another nuclear expert who sees the results of radiation on his patients, and they are not pretty...

DR QUIJANO MD SAYS THAT THERE IS NO SAFE DOSE OF RADIATION


"NUCLEAR RADIATION: THERE IS NO SAFE DOSE, by Romeo F. Quijano, M.D." 

He reports that; 

"Government "experts" are actually misinterpreting the standards used world-wide as the common basis for radiological protection standards......The concept of "permissible" or "acceptable" level is derived from toxicologic assumptions and extrapolations which do not constitute a valid rationale for a conclusion of "safety"......The "small" amount of radiation, claimed to be "safe" by authorities, added to our increasingly fragile environment will cause serious harm to the health of human beings and other living organisms all over the world. Radioactive particles, especially Plutonium, Strontium, and Cesium are bioaccumulative, extremely persistent and highly toxic.....Particularly devastating would be the inevitable damage to the genetic pool which will lead to an increase in the number of seriously defective offspring who will be born in future generations." 


FORMER PRIME MINISTER KAN SAYS THERE IS AN AGREEMENT OF SILENCE BETWEEN EDUCATORS, REGULATORS, MEDIA AND NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ON DANGERS OF RADIATION

Former prime minister pointed at the conspiracy between education, regulators, media and the nuclear industry.

Even Japanese former prime minister Kan describes this conspiracy between education, regulators, media and the nuclear industry. He says that they support each other. He used to be part of this cabal, but now has dedicated his life to exposing it and warning people of the danger of nuclear power.
http://enenews.com/former-prime-minister-kan-reveals-nuclear-coverup-after-fukushima-hes-devoting-himself-to-nuclear-activism-he-now-wants-to-abolish-nuclear-power-in-japan-video

Each of these industries and organizations profits from the relationship, but it is in large part based on fraud, deception, lies and PR spin, instead of a search for the truth and development of technology out of that. Anyone who participates in this cabal that ends up causing many millions of deaths and even more diseases and genetic havoc is just as guilty as the person who plans, organizes, supports or condones a genocidal maniac.  If you know a murder is happening you are obligated to do something about it, or you are just as guilty as the party actually pulling the trigger.

SUMMARY


Do you still believe the pro nuclear 'experts' who keep saying all man made nuclear elements are safe and harmless? Or do you believe the former industry 'insiders', the few individual nuclear industry workers who are coming out as whistleblowers, or those who are brave enough to risk looking in depth at the nuclear industry educators and researchers such as AGRP?

What will educational institutions do with this information if it is presented to them? Will they ignore the warnings and speed on into a brick wall dead ender technology that means the extinction of the human race long term?

Or will they correct course and divest themselves of any investments in nuclear? Will they fire all nuclear related researchers and professors? Will they adopt policies and procedures to ensure truth telling around the subject of nuclear in peer review journals and media?  There are answers that can be focused on. Educational courses can be designed to give students a bright hopeful and honest look at a sustainable future. The answers are all there. A zero carbon, zero nuclear future is possible. 


It will be interesting to see what happens.

WHAT YOU CAN DO; RESEARCH THE DARK SIDE OF THE NUCLEAR MONOPOLY

A Green Road Journal has the largest, most organized, deepest set of articles, videos and pictures exposing the dark side of the nuclear monopoly in the world.

Zero Nuclear Weapons Peace And Justice Project; First Strike Policy, Ban Nuclear Bombs, DU, Down Winders, Acute Radiation Sickness, Nuclear War, Dirty Bombs, Bomb Shelters
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/nuclear-bombs-and-nuclear-weapons.html

Zero Rads In Children And Adults Eco Justice Project - Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Radiation Exposure
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/low-dose-radiation-dangers-for-children.html

Zero Rads Extraction Eco Justice Project; Uranium Mining, Enrichment, Nuclear Fuel Chain, Open Air Testing, Fracking
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/uranium-mining-and-enrichment.html

Zero Internal Rads Eco Justice Project; Negative Effects Of Internal Radiation Exposure, Risk Models, Hormesis, Radiophobia, Radiation Monitoring Networks
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/effects-of-internal-low-level-nuclear.html

Making Invisible Heavy Metal Radioactive Poison Visible Eco Justice Project; Ionizing Heavy Metal Poisonous Radiation In Food/Water/Products, Geiger Counters, Dosimeters, Radiation Readings, Test Labs, Conversions, Global Detector Network
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/low-level-nuclear-radiation-in-food-and.html

Zero Harm To Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants Eco Justice Project; Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Heavy Metal Radioactive Poisons In Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/animals-and-low-level-radiation-effects.html

Zero Nuclear Power Plant Threat Eco Justice Project; Accidents, Recycling Nuclear Fuel, Movie Reviews, Next Generation Nuclear Plants, Terrorists
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/nuclear-accidents-around-world.html

Radiation Research, Education, Database Eco Justice Project; Individual Radioactive Elements/Isotopes, USA Radiation, Radiation Exposure Prevention, Reversal, Chelation
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/individual-radioactive-elementsisotopes.html

Eco Justice Art - Artists As Activists; Art, Aging, Poetry, Lyrics And Lawsuits Project; Lawsuits, Aging Nuclear Reactors, Recertification, Music, Lyrics, Poetry
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/nuclear-reactor-recertification.html

Zero Rad Waste Eco Justice Project; Long Term Storage Of Nuclear Waste, Decommissioning, Ocean Dumping, Incineration, Decontamination, Water Contamination, Dry Cask Storage
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/recycling-or-long-term-storage-of.html

MUSIC/ART ACTIVISM


Dr Busby and Children with Cancer

Chris Busby lays into the UK charity Children with Cancer, the largest childhood cancer charity in the UK, which he explains is standing in the way of finding the real causes of childhood cancer. He advises people to stop donating their money to an organisation that wastes it and which avoids looking at what is the obvious cause of childhood cancer, environmental exposure to radioactive contamination. This is clear from the recent studies of uranium particle exposure in Fallujah Iraq and a 14-fold increase in childhood cancer in that town. 

Nuclear sites, he argues, also run on uranium and release particulates, and are associated with childhood cancer. He accuses the conference committee of bias and draws attention to the astonishing choice of ex- nuclear industry British Nuclear Fuels (Sellafield) research chief, Richard Wakeford, (a man who has described himself as BNFLs Rottweiler) as the CWC plenary conference speaker on the relationship between ionizing radiation and childhood leukemia. He asks members of the public to write and complain to the charity commission and the trustees of the CWC."

WHAT YOU CAN DO; ENDORSE, LEARN, TRANSFORM, DONATE, SHARE, SUPPORT, SPONSOR, CONNECT, COMMENT, AND/OR COLLABORATE

DONATE

Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Donate To A Green Road Project; Help Dr. Goodheart Teach How To Make A Positive Difference For Seven Future Generations Of Children, Animals, Plants And The Planet

TRANSLATE

Click to Translate; 60 languages - German, French, Russian, Spanish

JOIN THE NETWORK OF OTHER ACTIVISTS; PLUG INTO AGRP


* Join the AGR Network. Forward this or any other article by clicking on the social media facebook, google plus and/or twitter buttons below any AGRP article. The first step for activists is to bring awareness of an issue to the public, by being informed yourself. Which news and information network do you prefer to plug into and network with?








 Email AGRP

RSS Feed

Subscribe to; A Green Road Project Magazine, monthly issues
It is easy to join the AGRP network, and your email will never be rented, sold or shared.

Subscribe/sign up, give feedback, or offer news tips or story ideas by sending an email to agreenroad@gmail.com . Subscribe by typing the word subscribe in the subject line.

COPYRIGHT

Wayne Dyer - What You Think, You Become (Wayne Dyer Meditation)

"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:www.lawcornel.edu/uscode.

Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.

WHAT YOU CAN DO: SHARE THIS ARTICLE

A Green Road; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. 

Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? 

Support AGR and share this article via by copying and pasting title and url into;

Website and contact page

Index, Table Of Contents

End

Pro Nuclear Industry Hormesis Theory Promoters At Colleges/Universities, Nuclear Research Facilities Debunked By Dr. Helen Caldicott MD - Professor Wade Allison As Example - 15 Design Flaws In GE Mark 1 Reactors - GE Dirty Secrets Exposed - STOP CALLING MURDER 'SCIENCE'
Reactions:
Share this post: