Share this post:
Wednesday, July 3, 2019
WHO, IAEA, ICRP, NCRP, And UNSCEAR Are All Staffed/Advised/Controlled By The Same Very Small Group of 100 Pro Nuclear Industry Promoters - 2014 UNSCEAR Report Labeled Criminal By Many Groups - UK Professor Geraldine Thomas; Fukushima Is A Perpetual Murder Machine

ICRP HAS SAME SMALL CLOSED, EXCLUSIVE CLUB MEMBERSHIP AND BELIEF SYSTEM AS IAEA, UNSCEAR AND MOST OTHER PRO NUCLEAR 'CLUBS'; ONLY THOSE WHO AGREE WITH THEIR DOGMA CAN 'BELONG' TO THE CLUB AND CIRCULATE THROUGH ALL THEIR GROUPS

One of the BIG things that people say when they trot out these PhD nuclear scientists or 'experts', is that they represent the 'consensus' of the entire world and all nuclear experts, in many varied scientific nuclear groups. But what they DON'T admit to a gullible public and politicians is that all of these organizations share the same very small group of members, who wear all of these varied groups pins on their jackets.

The other organizations that all have the same 'membership' consisting of pro nuclear apologists, such as the IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR and others, repeat the same ICRP 'official' report. They all promote the EXACT same 'viewpoint'.



These organizations  listed above who all share the same small group of at most 100 'groupthink' members, claim that 20 - 100 m/Sv per year is ok for a civilian to be exposed to, including children and pregnant moms. Listen in as one of these members admits that all of these various groups have the same very small clique who all promote the hormesis theory as members.


UK Professor Geraldine Thomas - Fukushima Is A Perpetual Murder Machine

If you know anything about radiation and how children and pregnant moms are much more at risk from the same dose, this claim of safety at 20 m/Sv per year is laughable at best, and criminal on the other end.

NISA, IAEA, WHO, Plus Pro Nuclear Government Politicians Covering Up And Minimizing Negative Effects From Nuclear Accidents; via @AGreenRoad



PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND A HUGE DOCTORS GROUP OFFERS PRESENTATION ON UNSCEAR REPORT


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MASAXtHfBOw

MEMBERS OF IAEA ARE ALSO MEMBERS OF ICRP, UNSCEAR


As documented in the video above, few people realize that the same people who are part of the IAEA, are also members of the UNSCEAR organization and are also members, advisors, and/or leaders/ of the IAEA and ICRP.

There is a BREAKDOWN OF IMPARTIAL AND SCIENTIFIC INDEPENDENCE, especially since they 'lock out' anyone who opposes or disagrees with their point of view.. There is a small pool of experts who participate and/or advise in all of these groups, so they same viewpoint is received and put out by all of these organizations. 

UNSCEAR MEMBERS HAVE VESTED INTEREST IN NUCLEAR POWER AND ARE PAID BY NATIONS THAT PROMOTE NUCLEAR POWER


British researcher blasts U.N. report on Fukushima cancer risk as unscientific
Baverstock said a report released in April by the U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) was “not qualified to be called ‘scientific’” because it lacked transparency and independent verification. He added that the committee should be disbanded. He also questioned UNSCEAR’s neutrality, given that members are nominated by nations that have a vested interest in nuclear power. He noted that such nations provide funds to the committee.

Baverstock also suggested a conflict of interest, as committee members are not required to disclose their history working in the nuclear industry or sign pledges stating that no conflict of interest exists in evaluating radiation risks.

IAEA IS COLLUDING WITH AND CONTROLLING WHO WITH SECRET AGREEMENT, TO COVER UP RADIATION DAMAGE AND MINIMIZE NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS


So when you think you are hearing from three different and individual scientific or international bodies, they are actually all one and the same. So what is the IAEA? The IAEA is a marketing arm of the nuclear industry, with it's budget paid for by the nuclear industry. For the details and proof plus a history lesson, click on the following links. 

WHO/IAEA Collusion – Negative Health Impact of Fukushima: Warnings and Recommendations by Michel Fernex; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/whoiaea-collusion-negative-health.html

IAEA, WHO, NRC And Others; A Web Of Deception? via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/05/iaea-who-and-others-web-of-deception.html

MaidenHeaven July 24, 2014 'So for the last 40 years the English government has been lying to the people. And the American, the Canadian, the Australian, they have been lying. They have been lying to protect industry, to protect their profits, to protect themselves from lawsuits....So they are really just liars and it is provable, sanctioned by the World Health Organization, without a shadow of a doubt. It is the same people that sit on the ICNAP certificate, sit on our government health protection agencies, sit on the World Health Organization . . . . it is the same people. There are probably no more than 20 of them."

"But, yes, they are going to, in my opinion, commit the worst genocide this planet has ever known, not just people, but animals and plants. They are probably going to cause more destruction than a global war, and in several hundred years time, people will look back, whoever survives, and look at what we tried to do to stop them. [..]"

”British physicist and electronic warfare expert, Barrie Trower. 

As the British physicist points out, WHO is not protecting public health, but rather, industries and profit making enterprises. Why would it be any surprise that the other organizations also have the same hidden motivations underneath their 'public' face and PR spin, which always sounds good and reasonable?

ICRP CAUGHT MANIPULATING AND FAKING SCIENTIFIC DATA

How many common sense people would trust an organization that manipulates and fakes scientific data in order to make their own industry look good?

ICRP [International Commission on Radiological Protection] Caught Manipulating And 'Faking' Scientific Data
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/05/icrp-international-commission-on.html

IAEA AND OTHERS PAID AND/OR SUPPORTED BY NUCLEAR INDUSTRY, BUT CLAIM TO BE 'NEUTRAL'


So on the one hand, we have the pro nuclear marketing arm of the nuclear industry, represented by the IAEA, WHO, NRC, UNSCEAR and ICRP, plus their allied politicians that receive 'donations' or fees (maybe they should be called bribes?) from the nuclear industry. They seem to care only about short term profits and protecting the 'image' of the nuclear industry, even inside of 'peer reviewed' studies..

On the other side, (featured in this article) we have the pro human rights, pro healthy children medical doctors and pro environmental groups who represent average people and communities that want a green, healthy and sustainable future. These 'outsider' groups are reporting on the 'true' science and medical research. These caring professionals are reporting on actual medical and scientific studies, representing them just as they are, with no industry bias or profit motive.

No one other than an industry 'insider' can get published, and then only if the conclusions are pro nuclear. Outsiders that disagree with the nuclear industry positions are attacked personally via ad hominem attacks, and labeled as distributing 'fear porn' or other degrading terms.

Which 'expert' would you listen to? Your medical doctor below, or a pro nuclear industry insider?

Which one would you trust?

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON RADIATION PROTECTION (NCRP)

At first glance, the council sounds really good... They are providing radiation protection and information... how could that be bad? 

"The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) seeks to formulate and widely disseminate information, guidance and recommendations on radiation protection and measurements which represent the consensus of leading scientific thinking."

According to the pro nuclear apologists, this organization has credibility because the AMA, American Society of Med Physicists, HPS, ANS and other organizations 'cite' them. and one member commented the proponents of the nuclear industry sees "nothing here that suggests they are in the pocket of special interests. They have the public interest at heart."

or-well July 24, 2014 As opposed to the orthodoxy of my cult blah blah blah; for bigger profit take bigger risk!
http://vault.sierraclub.org/sierra/201107/images/carlpope.jpg

WHO ARE THE MEMBERS OF THIS SUPPOSEDLY NEUTRAL COUNCIL THAT HAVE ONLY PUBLIC INTEREST AT HEART?


Now let's dive a little deeper into the nuclear pond that makes up this council. Who belongs to it, and what are their ties to the nuclear industry? Do any of them have biases, conflicts of interest or the profit motive on their agenda? It does not take long to find the industry corruption inside the belly of this organization, just like all of the others; IAEA, UNSCEAR, WHO, etc. 

Let's pick two names at random as of 2014; 

BROOKE R. BUDDEMEIER is an associate program leader in the Global Security Directorate of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) (council member as of 7/2014)

Would you bite the hands that feed you? Here is a member of the council who also promotes the nuclear industry.. There is absolutely no conflict of interest here, no bias, no favoritism, no hidden motives, right? Let's all vote that this person is also absolutely neutral, unbiased, not influenced by money or profits in the nuclear radiation for profit business and government nuclear research contracts business, correct? 

JUDITH L. BADER was a senior investigator in many cancer clinical trials, genetics and epidemiology research projects, and communications technologies projects during her 22 y in the U.S. Public Health Service at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Instititutes of Health. She has been the Chief of the Clinical Radiation Branch of the Radiation Oncology Branch at NCI, Chief of Radiation Oncology at the Bethesda Naval Hospital (now Walter Reed), and founding physician of two private radiation oncology practices. (council member as of 7/2014)

This sure looks like another promoter and user of nuclear radiation for profit, correct? Everyone will vote that this person is also absolutely neutral, unbiased, not influenced by money or profits in the medical radiation for profit business, correct? 

Yup, all of these council members are truly independent, just like the ones paid by the nuclear industry over at IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR and all of the rest. No conflict of interest or bias here, right? (Sarcasm)

CONSENSUS; HOW DOES IT WORK INSIDE OF NCRP, NRPB, UNSCEAR, AND BEIR?


The NCRP claims that they; "represent the consensus of leading scientific thinking." Do these two 'leading minds' sound like they have the public and not the nuclear industry profits in mind during their decision making? Not likely. So how can they form a 'consensus' of leading minds, when there are a bunch of PhD's that disagree with them? Consensus requires agreement among ALL of the global leading minds that are also OUTSIDE of this closed minded pro nuclear circle.

This small pro nuclear circle excludes everyone except those who are pro nuclear industry, pro more radiation exposure and looser radiation laws, with higher radiation exposure allowed around everything. So much for the consensus claim.

“NCRP, NRPB, UNSCEAR, and BEIR, like Fascist dictators, inflexibly demand that their archaic model of radiation effects be the basis for radiation protection. They tyrannize all…

WHAT IS REAL CONSENSUS?


As a decision-making process, consensus decision-making aims to be:[2]

Agreement Seeking: A consensus decision making process attempts to generate as much agreement as possible.[2]

Collaborative: Participants contribute to a shared proposal and shape it into a decision that meets the concerns of all group members as much as possible.[3]

Cooperative: Participants in an effective consensus process should strive to reach the best possible decision for the group and all of its members, rather than competing for personal preferences.

Egalitarian: All members of a consensus decision-making body should be afforded, as much as possible, equal input into the process. All members have the opportunity to present, and amend proposals.

Inclusive: As many stakeholders as possible should be involved in the consensus decision-making process.

Participatory: The consensus process should actively solicit the input and participation of all decision-makers.[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making


INDEPENDENT NUCLEAR EXPERTS ARE EXCLUSED FROM THE GOOD OLD BOYS PRO NUCLEAR CLUB, NO CONSENSUS IS POSSIBLE, JUST FASCIST CONTROL BY THE MONOPOLISTIC NUCLEAR INDUSTRY


Do you see Arnie Gunderson, Busby or any of the other champions in this group? No?  Do you see any nuclear industry whistleblowers? No.

It is very easy to get consensus, if all of the 'experts' and 'leading minds' are leading the way for the nuclear industry to make more profits, and gain more control, raise the radiation limits constantly, with less and less regulations or protections, wouldn't you agree?   

By that standard, consensus can consist of one person who makes up their mind that the moon is made of blue cheese. Let's all take a vote. Aye, because it will avoid lawsuits and make us all lots of money! The ayes have it, with no nays, there is a consensus, the moon is indeed made of blue cheese. Wow, that was easy. We should have done this 'consensus' thing a LONG time ago.

What these yahoo pretend want to be scientists don't realize is that science is NOT about consensus in a small closed off group that agrees on fake science results, but about debating back and forth in an open forum that includes all points of view and the truth appears via scientists both inside and outside the nuclear industry deciding for themselves, and the public watching this open process at work. 

Since none of this is happening inside the nuclear industry or these agencies, the truth can be hidden away and these closed minded, closed off cells of pro nuclear apologists can PRETEND that they are the icons of truth and virtue, with all of their peer reviewed this and peer reviewed that, but underneath it all, it is a huge pile of you know what, because no debate or disagreement is allowed. 

PraisingTruthApril 18, 2015 A Primer in the Art of Deception: The Cult of Nuclearists, Uranium Weapons and Fraudulent Science
“…The mentality that sponsors and endorses the Life Span Study is the same mentality that advocates that nuclear war is winnable, tactical nuclear weapons are useable, and radiological weapons have a place on today’s battlefield. This dogma is dangerous, a product of corrupted thinking perpetrated by the Cult of Nuclearists, that may very well draw the entire world over the edge into limited or total thermonuclear war.

“Exhibit D
“The astute reader may have asked at some point why the history of radiation safety provided earlier in this chapter stopped where it did in the 1950s following publication by the ICRP and NCRP of the first standards of safety for internal contamination. What happened to the second half of the Twentieth Century? This is the million-dollar question.

“The model used today by international agencies formulating safety for internal contamination by radionuclides is essentially the same model, with updated modifications, developed during the Manhattan Project, the Tri-Partite Conferences, and the meetings of the committees on internal emitters of the NCRP and the ICRP.

This model was developed prior to the discovery of DNA!
Since the 1950s, a revolution has taken place in biology. Entire vistas of cellular and molecular biology,  totally unsuspected by World War II physicists, have opened up for scientific exploration. The rapid advancement in technology has created powerful tools for imaging cellular structures and probing the mysteries of the molecular chemistry that orchestrates cellular processes. Advances have been so profound that, today, microbeams can deliver individual alpha particles to cells in vitro and the altered morphology of cellular structures can be determined by DNA sequencing and correlated with functional aberrations. Over this amazing new world of microscopic wonders and the deepening understanding of the cellular and molecular basis of life, the ICRP. 

MEDICAL DOCTORS AND MANY GROUPS SAY UNSCEAR REPORT GREATLY UNDERESTIMATES AND MINIMIZES NEGATIVE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF FUKUSHIMA MEGA NUCLEAR DISASTER 


Doctors Say UN Science Report Systematically Underestimates Health Impact of Fukushima Catastrophe

Physicians for Social Responsibility and Human Rights Now talk about how Since the March 2011 nuclear disaster in Fukushima, individuals and communities in Japan continue to be exposed to dangerous levels of radioactivity. There are serious concerns about consequent health effects for citizens in contaminated areas.

Residents have a right to live in a safe and healthy environment, however, sufficient protective measures and support are not being provided. The right of access to medical treatment and the medical data about one's own body are being seriously denied. Experts will speak about how two UN reports impact policy regarding the lives and health of citizens currently affected after the nuclear disaster, and what should be done to provide immediate relief to protect their fundamental rights.
Dr. John Rachow, Ph.D., M.D.

Dr. Rachow is a practicing physician, Board Member and Chair of the Radiation and Health Committee, and Past President (2011) of Physicians for Social Responsibility, Washington, DC. He is also an Assistant Clinical Professor of University of Iowa, Department of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Mari Inoue, Esq., is a practicing lawyer and New York representative of Human Rights Now, Tokyo, Japan.
From the video above; "Human Rights Experts call for immediate action to protect the right to health of citizens affected by the nuclear accident in Fukushima.

Critical Analysis of the UNSCEAR Report “Levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East-Japan Earthquake and tsunami” by
Physicians for Social Responsibility, USA
International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War / Physicians in social responsibility, Germany
Physicians for Global Survival, Canada
Mexican Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Mexico
Association of Guatemalan Physicians and Scientists for the Prevention of War, Guatemala
Physicians for Social Responsibility / IPPNW, Switzerland
Danish Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (DLMK), Denmark
Medical Association for the Protection of the Environment and Against Nuclear and Biochemical Threat, Greece
French Physicians Against Nuclear Weapons (AMFPGN), France
Physicians Union Lege Artis, Serbia
Dutch Medical Association for Peace Research (NVMP), The Netherlands
Irish Doctors Environmental Association, Ireland
Association of Physicians and Medical Workers for Social Responsibility / IPPNW, Kenya
Society of Nigerian Doctors for the Welfare of Mankind, Nigeria
Physicians for Social Responsibility, Egypt
Physicians for Peace and Preservation of the Environment, Israel
Indian Doctors for Peace and Development (IDPD), India
Physicians for Peace and Social Responsibility, Malaysia
Austrian Physicians against Violence and Nuclear Dangers (OMEGA), Austria"
via CiscoJuly 20, 2014 

UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL DISAGREES WITH ICRP AND IS EXTREMELY CRITICAL OF TEPCO

Mr. Anand Grover, Esq.
Mr. Anand Grover, appointed by UN Human Right Council at its eighth session in June 2008, is the UN Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The position is honorary and he is not a staff of the United Nations nor paid for his work. He is also a practicing attorney in the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court of India.

From November 15 to 26, 2012, Mr. Grover was on a country mission to Japan to conduct an independent investigation on issues related to the enjoyment of the right to health, including availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of health services, goods and facilities. Additional aspects investigated are, the underlying determinants of health in Japan within the context of the Great East Japan Earthquake, the events leading to it (including emergency response, recovery and mitigation with a particular focus on challenges and actions taken in response to them), as well as lessons learned and good practices.

The mission involved meetings with Japanese government officials, non-governmental organizations, and local citizens affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake, tsunami and the nuclear disaster in Fukushima. Mr. Grover's report on his findings and recommendations was submitted to the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in May 2013, and will be reported to the Third Committee of the UN General Assembly in New York on October 25, 2013.

UN Human Rights Council Fukushima Report Extremely Critical Of TEPCO And Government


HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION DISAGREES WITH ICRP ALONG WITH 64 JAPANESE CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS; THEY ARE ALL IN CONSENSUS, IN OPPOSITION TO UNSCEAR


HUMAN RIGHTS NOW
On 10/24/2013, Human Rights Now, along with 64 Japanese civil society organizations, has issued a statement requesting the UNSCEAR and the General Assembly Fourth Committee to revise the report and its finding from a human rights perspective.
hrn.or.jp/eng/activity/area/worldwide/ja­panese-civil-society-requests-that-the-r­eports-of-the-united-nations-scientific-­committee-on-fukus/

PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISAGREES WITH ICRP


PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Please refer to the more detailed full-version commentary: 
(Contact: alfred.c.meyer@gmail.com (PSR USA), alexrosen@gmx.net (IPPNW Germany) for the PSR/IPPNW commentary.)
Source; description under video above

In Germany, medical doctors are very critical of the UNSCEAR report saying that there will be no harm from Fukushima radiation to anyone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGsx3CYTYAs 6 min

IPPNW PHYSICIANS GROUP FIND 10 GRAVE ERRORS IN UNSCEAR REPORT


Cisco July 18, 2014  Global Physicians Issue Scathing Critique of UN Report on Fukushima  "Fukushima: Bad and Getting Worse"

"The International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) joined the controversy June 4, with a 27-page “Critical Analysis of the UNSCEAR Report ‘Levels and effects of radiation exposures due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East-Japan Earthquake and tsunami."

"Physicians find ten grave failures in UN report"

"The majority of the IPPNW’s report details 10 major errors, flaws or discrepancies in the UNSCEAR paper and explains study’s omissions, underestimates, inept comparisons, misinterpretations and unwarranted conclusions."

Read IPPNW's 10 major errors at 
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/07/18/fukushima-bad-and-getting-worse/

UNSCEAR REPORT LABELED CRIMINAL


Via rogerthat September 30, 2014  Asian forum warns of nuclear threats Tue, Sep 30, 2014 – Page 4
… Mari Takenouchi, a Japanese reporter from Okinawa Prefecture, accused the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation of publishing false studies that claim nuclear radiation is “harmless” to the human body. Calling the committee’s move “criminal,” she said that the UN might appear to show concern over threats posed by nuclear power, but it is lobbying for development of the high-risk energy. She said the chance of contracting thyroid cancer in Fukushima used to be one in 1 million, but after the nuclear accident, the figure rose to one in 3,000. Takenouchi said the nuclear radiation emitted in the aftermath of the accident not only affected Fukushima residents, but spread across a vast area.

ICRP IS ADVOCATING JUNK SCIENCE: SAME DOSE FOR EVERYONE, NO MATTER WHAT THEIR AGE OR SEX


Via American Phoenix57 July 19, 2014 "The dirty secret that the largely cheerleading function of mainstream media..conceal on behalf of the nuclear industry is that exceedingly low levels of internalized (inhaled or swallowed) radioisotopes may do exponentially more harm than present radiation risk models allow for. i.e. ICRP 103

In order to understand the absurdity of drawing a one-to-one comparison between external and internal radiation exposures, Professor Chris Busby (Scientific Secretary for the European Committee on Radiation Risk) draws the analogy between direct comparison between external radiation and internal radiation exposures with warming oneself in front of a fire and eating a red hot coal.

Indeed, the public is being lulled into pulling up a comfy chair to warm themselves by the radioactive fire of a disaster the scale of which this world has never known before."

The ICRP and other pro nuclear organizations draw no distinction between sitting in front of a radioactive fire and swallowing pieces of the radioactive coals or ash, not even for infants or a fetus in utero, who are 2,000 times more sensitive to the same dose as a healthy adult male. They also ignore the fact that women and girls are more than twice as sensitive to the same radiation dose as men or boys.

Via majia July 19, 2014 "The Fox interview with Mr Aubry Godwin (sp?) repeats the typical nuke mantra, ignoring altogether INTERNAL EMITTERS, many of which are toxic chemically as well as being radioactive. Alpha and beta particles do far more damage to cells and DNA than gamma radiation. One atom of plutonium or uranium in your lung could cause your death. One atom in your testes could doom your unborn children....Look up genetic mosaicism is our future, until we fail to reproduce successfully at all."

Effects Of Internal Low Level Nuclear Radiation
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/effects-of-internal-low-level-nuclear.html


ICRP IGNORES 111 SCIENTIFIC PAPERS EXPOSING ICRP CONCLUSIONS AND POSITION


or-well July 19, 2014... no "mention within of 111 scientific papers refuting ICRP
http://nuclearhistory.wordpress.com/2013/07/11/the-bloody-minded-british-gov-refusal-to-allow-genetic-testing-of-veterans-science-refutes-the-government-hacks-of-nuclear-industry/


LNT THEORY PROMOTED BY ICRP DISCREDITED BY FRENCH ACADEMCY OF MEDICINE 


"This is the English Executive Summary of a document unanimously approved
yesterday by the French Academy of Medicine and Academy of Sciences to,
again, directly challenge the LNT.....This is another resource to refute the false LNT being used by ICRP, NCRP,
et al. to support the radiation protection and medical mainstream
self-interests, at wasted costs of $100 of billions to society, and the
fraudulent costly/profitable effects on nuclear power and nuclear
technologies."
http://mailman.mcmaster.ca/mailman/private/cdn-nucl-l/0410/msg00018.html

People around the world are lumped together by the ICRP into one group so large, that nothing specific can be seen. The IRCP and the rest of the pro nuclear apologists are very good at hiding the radioactively caused genocide of infants and newborns, plus still born and deformed babies, in their computer generated statistical studies. The statistics and studies are designed to confuse the public, plus hide and cover up the genocide that is happening in open sight. You can hide a genocide in open sight, if you make the group large enough. Statistically speaking, a million people can be killed, and it would not show up, outside of the 'norm'.

Low Dose Radiation Dangers/Symptoms For Children And Adults
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/low-dose-radiation-dangers-for-children.html

ICRP IGNORES TARGETED, BYSTANDER AND DELAYED EFFECTS OF RADIATION


majia July 19, 2014 ICRP "homogenized dose... doesn't address targeted, bystander and delayed effects. If you want to debate please read my book, chapter four, first Fukushima and the privatization of risk. ( pal grave 2013)"

Art And Science Of Deception; Global Corporations And The 1%
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/corporations-art-and-science-of.html

43 GROUPS REQUESTING REVISION OF UNSCEAR REPORT AND NEW MANDATE


Via Bungalow Phil November 12, 2014 "A Letter Hand-delivered to the UN and UNSCEAR, Requesting Revision of UNSCEAR Report And a New UN Mandate for UNSCEAR

On October 24, 2014, at the Fourth Committee of the UN General Assembly being held in New York City, representatives from Physicians for Social Responsibility (USA) and Human Rights Now (Tokyo, Japan) hand-delivered a letter to the chairperson of the 4th Committee and the Secretary of UNSCEAR. The letter, co-signed by 43 civil society groups from 9 countries, including 21 Japanese groups, requested revision of the 2014 UNSCEAR report on Fukushima accident as well as a new UN mandate for UNSCEAR.
Read more on this here
http://fukushimavoice-eng2.blogspot.jp/2014/11/a-letter-hand-delivered-to-un-and.html

I SHALL SING

MARCIA GRIFFITHS IS SHALL SING
https://youtu.be/qYHLERwje0M

To end things on a positive, happy note..

SUMMARY

What conclusion would a reasonable person draw from all of the above, very legitimate, scientific, medical and nuclear experts who draw completely opposite conclusions from these pro nuclear organizations that draw on what one person refers to as a small inner circle of 20 people who staff all of these organizations with different names.

What if it is true that actually underneath it all, there is only a very small close knit 'family' controlling all of these groups and coming up with the same supposedly independent conclusions, via a peer review process? They must all be very good friends and talk a lot, if they all belong to these same groups and travel all over the planet doing work on behalf of these different groups.

What kind of a neutral, arms length, peer review independence, reporting and analysis can you get from 20 people who all work together and are getting funding from the nuclear industry, while pretending to be multiple different organizations, doing different things?

Maybe it is time to start an investigation by an international citizens court (like a grand jury) about these different groups and what happens behind the curtains. It is time to find out who knows who. It is time to find out where the money comes from and where it goes.  What does that money buy in terms of influence and conclusions?

WHAT YOU CAN DO; ENDORSE, LEARN, TRANSFORM, DONATE, SHARE, SUPPORT, SPONSOR, CONNECT, COMMENT, AND/OR COLLABORATE

DONATE

Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Donate To A Green Road Project; Help Dr. Goodheart Teach How To Make A Positive Difference For Seven Future Generations Of Children, Animals, Plants And The Planet

TRANSLATE

Click to Translate; 60 languages - German, French, Russian, Spanish

JOIN THE NETWORK OF OTHER ACTIVISTS; PLUG INTO AGRP


* Join the AGR Network. Forward this or any other article by clicking on the social media facebook, google plus and/or twitter buttons below any AGRP article. The first step for activists is to bring awareness of an issue to the public, by being informed yourself. Which news and information network do you prefer to plug into and network with?








 Email AGRP

RSS Feed

Subscribe to; A Green Road Project Magazine, monthly issues
It is easy to join the AGRP network, and your email will never be rented, sold or shared.

Subscribe/sign up, give feedback, or offer news tips or story ideas by sending an email to agreenroad@gmail.com . Subscribe by typing the word subscribe in the subject line.

COPYRIGHT

Wayne Dyer - What You Think, You Become (Wayne Dyer Meditation)

"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:www.lawcornel.edu/uscode.

Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.

WHAT YOU CAN DO: SHARE THIS ARTICLE

A Green Road; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. 

Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? 

Support AGR and share this article via by copying and pasting title and url into;

End



WHO, IAEA, ICRP, NCRP, And UNSCEAR Are All Staffed/Advised/Controlled By The Same Very Small Group of 100 Pro Nuclear Industry Promoters - 2014 UNSCEAR Report Labeled Criminal By Many Groups - UK Professor Geraldine Thomas; Fukushima Is A Perpetual Murder Machine
https://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/04/iaea-icrp-and-unscear-are-all-staffed.html

Website and contact page

Index, Table Of Contents

A Green Road Project - Science Of Sustainable Health Open Source Commons Knowledge Database
- Click in search box in upper right corner and type in search term to find any related article(s)

Reactions:
Share this post: