Share this post:
Tuesday, December 17, 2019
ICRP [International Commission on Radiological Protection] Caught Manipulating And 'Faking' Scientific Data - Is There Censorship Of Truth And Perverting Science For Profit And Power Inside Of The Nuclear Monopoly? Promotes Quack Hormesis Theory - Faked, Manufactured 'Consensus'

"On 12th September 2012 Prof Chris Busby gave a presentation to the United Nations Human Rights Council on the subject of man-made radiation exposure and human rights.
Video http://youtu.be/gNfR0odE0l4 36 min..


WHO IS RIGHT? DR BUSBY OR THE MANY VARIED "SCIENTIFIC" ORGANIZATIONS THAT ALL CLAIM 'CONSENSUS'?


The formal submission document was sponsored by the Union of Arab Jurists and a number of other NGOs. In his presentation in the UN Geneva shown here, Chris points out that the systematic pollution of the global environment by radioactivity, sanctioned by governments, is underpinned by the Radiation Risk Model of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, the ICRP, which scientific advances in the last ten years have shown to be wildly incorrect. 

The result has been the most serious public health scandal in human history. As an example Chris Busby reviews his own colleagues work on the health effects of Uranium weapons in Fallujah and presents a strategy for changing the situation. This involves a petition and legal challenge to the European Basic Safety Standards Directive. The petition template and further details can be downloaded from www.nuclearjustice.org"
Source; http://youtu.be/gNfR0odE0l4

Depleted Uranium - Physicians For Social Responsibility; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/12/depleted-uranium-physicians-for-social.html


WHY ICRP DATA AND CONCLUSIONS ARE WILDLY INCORRECT AND TOTALLY UNREALISTIC; AIPRI CALLS IT A SCIENTIFIC CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY; INTERNAL DOSAGE AND EFFECT IS NOT CONSIDERED REALISTICALLY

AIPRI: The scam physical factors of internal dose of the ICRP
These internal dose factors are a lie, a physics falsehood and a scientific crime against humanity.

Jebus April 6, 2015  Aspects of DNA Damage from Internal Radionuclides – Christopher Busby
Comparing external and internal irradiation: the ICRP/ ICRU bag of water model. In case A, external radiation (X-rays or gamma rays) there are 20 events uniformly spaced throughout the tissue and the “absorbed dose” (see text) at any microscopic point is evenly distributed. In case B, for internal irradiation (here from a radioactive particle) there is a very large transfer of energy to a small tissue volume and the concept of “absorbed dose” does not apply.

Bottom line, the ICPR model ignores hot particles completely. The ICRP model also COMPLETELY ignores the effect of ingested or inhaled radiation, and it's effect over a longer period of time. 

Children And Adults - Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Radiation Exposure
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/low-dose-radiation-dangers-for-children.html

ICRP MODEL USED TO UNDERESTIMATE CANCER RISKS, DISMISS HEALTH FINDINGS AND EXCUSE INADEQUATE MONITORING OF RADIATION CONTAMINATION LEVELS


Jebus April 7, 2015  Radiation Health Effects, ICRP Radiation Model Inadequacies
The officially-sanctioned International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) model masquerades as being scientifically based. It is being used to underestimate cancer and other detrimental health risks of radiation exposure, misrepresent nuclear accident risks, dismiss actual health findings, and excuse inadequate monitoring of the contamination levels.

ICRP PROMOTES RADIATION CONTAMINATED FOOD 

Dr. Conrad Miller MD reports that we should all be grateful now that the ICRP has made radioactive contaminated food more accessible; "there may be situations where sustainable agriculture is not possible without placing contaminated foods on the market".

In other words, it is more important to protect the nuclear industry, the profits of food corporations and keep a country from going bankrupt from the consequences of taking out 25,000 square miles of farms from a nuclear accident, than to protect the health of seventy future generations. 

Japan - Fukushima Farmers Growing Food On Radioactively Contaminated Lands, Then Exporting It, Won't Eat It Themselves; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/10/farmers-growing-food-in-radioactively.html

ICRP IS A QUACK HORMESIS THEORY PROMOTING ORGANIZATION


The ICRP is a pro nuclear organization made up of theoretical nuclear scientists (that have no medical or health training). The ICRP promotes the 'safety' of radiation, via official reports to governments, such as the report they created and gave to TEPCO and the Japanese government, after the 3/11 Fukushima mega nuclear disaster. IRCP, IAEA and WHO promote the theory of hormesis. 

Ann Coulter Says More Radiation Is Good For You Via Fox News, As Part Of Mass Media Promoting Nuclear Industry Hormesis Theory
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/ann-coulter-says-more-radiation-is-good.html

ICRP is the organization that reported residents could be exposed to between 20 and 100 m/Sv per year, when the previous maximum was 1 m/Sv per year. They make the outrageous and false claim that no one will experience any negative health consequences from this amount of radiation. This 'official' report was then used by the Japanese government to move people back into the highly radiation contaminated areas close to the Fukushima nuclear disaster site, an area which is contaminated with more radiation than the Chernobyl exclusion zones, where no one is allowed to live, generations after that nuclear disaster. 

Of course, the easiest solution is to pretend that decontamination is possible and successful, and then move people back into these areas and then on top of that, pretend that all radiation is good for you, via the hormesis theory. Anyone complaining about radiation caused diseases, cancers or deaths is labeled as being Radiophobic.  In Japan, that is exactly what they are doing.

2014 - Japanese Government Moving People Into Areas with Up To 10 Times Maximum Nuclear Workers Annual Radiation Exposure Limit; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/03/2014-japanese-government-moving-people.html

PRO NUCLEAR APOLOGIST ORGANIZATIONS COVERING UP TRUE COST AND NEGATIVE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF MAN MADE RADIOACTIVE HEAVY METAL POISONS


Fukushima is a nuclear disaster that will kill millions of people at the very least in the 30 years after this mega disaster, because it is much larger than Chernobyl. The one melted out Chernobyl nuclear disaster has caused 1,500,000 deaths as of 2014, and that number will keep on growing.

Chernobyl Coverup And Denial Of 1 Million + Casualties; via A Green Road 

The Chernobyl Sacrifice; 1 MILLION Liquidators; via A Green Road

So what makes the Fukushima mega disaster different from Chernobyl, and why are people being moved back in around Fukushima, when they are not allowed to move back into radiation contaminated areas around Chernobyl?

PRO NUCLEAR EXPERTS ALL BELIEVE IN HORMESIS, DESPITE IT BEING DISPROVEN MANY YEARS AGO


What makes man made radiation harmless and good for you all of a sudden in Japan?

Radium; The Epic Story That Disproves Hormesis And Medical Radiation Theory First Proposed By Madame Curie; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/02/radium.html

Radium Girls And Radium Dials In Ottowa Illinois, Death City; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/radium-girls-radium-dials-ottowa.html

Hormesis; What Does Not Kill You, Is Good For You
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/05/hormesis-what-does-not-kill-you-is-good.html

Rachel Maddow - Hormesis Promoting Republican Art Robinson Wants To Sprinkle Radioactive Waste From Airplanes Over Cities? via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/08/rachel-maddow-hormesis-promoting.html

Radioactive Thorium Beach In Guarapari, Brazil; Hormesis Theory Debunked; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/radioactive-beach-sand-in-brazil.html

Radon Dangers; Hormesis Explored; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/radon-dangers-and-hormesis.html

MAXIMUM RADIATION LEVELS SHOULD BE DROPPED, NOT RAISED, AS THE PRO NUCLEAR APOLOGISTS ARE RECOMMENDING


How does the ICRP and IAEA recommendation of much higher levels of radiation being safe to live in and ok to eat or drink, square with other organizations who are made up primarily of medical doctors, who are recommending that the current 1 m/Sv maximum dose be dropped to .02 m/Sv per year, because the 1 m/Sv dose has been found to be too high and cause too much harm to health and genes from radiation? 

Medical doctors who are experts in low dose radiation have an entirely different view from the IAEA, ICRP and WHO. The medical doctors view is that allowing people to be exposed to this increased dose of radiation is the same as committing murder or genocide, and that the people recommending this should be treated as criminals.
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/threshold-and-hormesis-invented-and-murderous/

ICRP SUPPORTS BOGUS RADIOPHOBIA THEORY

Because the ICRP believes and teaches that radiation in effect causes no harm, by promoting the hormesis theory, they are also supporting the IAEA in their Radiophobia theory. Bottom line, the members of both organizations believe the same things, teach the same things, and have membership in each others organizations, in a very close knit, small closed off circle of people.

Radiophobia - IAEA Blames Victims For All Cumulative Radiation Damage And Negative Health Effects, Claims All Man Made Radiation Heals People Via Hormesis
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/10/radiophobia-iaea-blames-victims-for-all.html

ORIGIN OF NUCLEAR INDUSTRY - NAZI SCIENTISTS AND WAR CRIMINALS IMPORTED AFTER END OF WORLD WAR II


Remember that the origin of the nuclear industry was from Nazi Germany. Hundreds of these pro nuclear scientists were imported and started the very secretive nuclear industry. When someone starts an organization with people that are war criminals, where do you think it will end up going? 

Project Paper Clip; USA Imported And Hired Hundreds Of Nazi War Criminals To Develop Nuclear Industry; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/04/project-paper-clip-usa-imported-and.html

ICRP HAS SAME SMALL CLOSED, EXCLUSIVE CLUB MEMBERSHIP AND BELIEF SYSTEM AS IAEA, UNSCEAR AND MOST OTHER PRO NUCLEAR 'CLUBS'; ONLY THOSE WHO AGREE WITH THEIR DOGMA CAN 'BELONG' TO THE CLUB AND CIRCULATE THROUGH ALL THEIR GROUPS

One of the BIG things that people say when they trot out these PhD nuclear scientists or 'experts', is that they represent the 'consensus' of the entire world and all nuclear experts, in many varied scientific nuclear groups. But what they DON'T admit to a gullible public and politicians is that all of these organizations share the same very small group of members, who wear all of these varied groups pins on their jackets.

The other organizations that all have the same 'membership' consisting of pro nuclear apologists, such as the IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR and others, repeat the same ICRP 'official' report. They all promote the EXACT same 'viewpoint'.



These organizations  listed above who all share the same small group of at most 100 'groupthink' members, claim that 20 - 100 m/Sv per year is ok for a civilian to be exposed to, including children and pregnant moms. Listen in as one of these members admits that all of these various groups have the same very small clique who all promote the hormesis theory as members. Video; https://youtu.be/87ka6n0L7zE?t=20m45s

If you know anything about radiation and how children and pregnant moms are much more at risk from the same dose, this claim of safety at 20 m/Sv per year is laughable at best, and criminal on the other end.

NISA, IAEA, WHO, Plus Pro Nuclear Government Politicians Covering Up And Minimizing Negative Effects From Nuclear Accidents; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/10/governments-covering-up-and-minimizing.html

ICRP AND OTHER 'REGULATORS' ARE OK WITH 250 m/Sv EXPOSURE


Never mind that before this nuclear accident, the maximum radiation dose allowed for civilians was just 1 m/Sv per year globally. Why was 1 m/Sv the maximum radiation dose allowed for civilians before the accident, but now 100 times that is ok, especially when the maximum radiation allowed for a healthy adult male nuclear worker, exposed to radiation at work 8 hours a day, is not supposed to go over 20 m/Sv per year?  

To understand the MIND BOGGLING implications of this, read the following article..

Fukushima Workers 'Allowed' 250 mSv/yr, Compared To 20 mSv/yr For US Nuclear Industry Workers; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/03/fukushima-workers-allowed-250-msvyr.html

The way that these pro nuclear apologist organizations get away with this hormesis theory, is that they claim the theory of hormesis is true, and they are nuclear 'experts', so many people believe them, because the are 'trusted'.

These pro nuclear experts who are trusted, claim that radiation is actually good for a person, and the more they get, the better health that person will experience, even if that radiation source is man made, such as from a nuclear disaster. The only problem is that the hormesis theory has been soundly debunked and proven to be false, many, many years ago.

ALL NUCLEAR 'EXPERTS' CLAIM NO ONE DIES, NO ONE IS HURT FROM INCREASING MAN MADE RADIATION LEVELS AND NUCLEAR DISASTER FALLOUT


What these pro nuclear apologists are promoting is fraudulent science, pure and simple. Where does the trust in these supposed nuclear experts go, when what they are reporting has been been proven to be false, not just once, but over and over again? 

Hormesis; What Does Not Kill You, Is Good For You
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/05/hormesis-what-does-not-kill-you-is-good.html

Radioactive Beach In Guarapari, Brazil; via A Green Road
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/radioactive-beach-sand-in-brazil.html

Rachel Maddow - Hormesis Promoting Republican Art Robinson Wants To Sprinkle Radioactive Waste From Airplanes Over Cities? via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/08/rachel-maddow-hormesis-promoting.html

Starting with a premise that all radiation is good for you, and can cause no harm, it is easy to see how these organizations can claim that no one died, no one will die and no one will get cancer from any nuclear accident. Not only does this make the nuclear industry 'look good', but it also protects them from lawsuits and financial claims. Courts take these nuclear 'experts' claims as God's truth, and toss claims of harm by civilians out of court, as happened after TMI. 

The few medical researchers and independent scientists studying the actual victims of these nuclear disasters and not just blind computer models and projections, come up with quite different numbers and risk models, as they look at the increased death, disease and cancer rates around nuclear accident zones. They come up with studies and  conclusions using ACTUAL numbers, not computer generated estimates. Isn't that how science is supposed to work?

ICRP, IAEA, WHO AND OTHER PRO NUCLEAR APOLOGISTS DENY MORE THAN JUST A FEW DEATHS DUE TO CHERNOBYL


IPPNW - Global Health Effects And Number Of Deaths Caused By Chernobyl Nuclear Planet Meltdown - 69 Million Victims; via @AGreenRoad

The Art of Deception: The Cult of Nuclearists, Uranium Weapons and Fraudulent Science; via A Green Road
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/03/primer-in-art-of-deception-cult-of.html

ICRP MANIPULATED AND FAKED SCIENTIFIC DATA 


On 12/28/2011, NHK reported ICRP’s [International Commission on Radiological Protection] manipulation and 'fake' scientific data in the late 1980'sIn this TV news show, NHK reported that ICRP manipulated the actual nuclear radiation safety data for purely political reasons, in order to make nuclear power look 'safe'. The ICRP standard is known as a false or fake “science”, which the experts make up in order to make nuclear power appear to be safe. In reality, cancer rates go up even if the exposure is only 10 m/Sv per year, which is ten times the maximum a civilian is supposed to be exposed to.
http://enenews.com/report-nhk-starting-broadcast-truth-large-increase-brain-tumors-cancer-nuke-plant-everyone-died-im-alive-killing-govt-kept-telling-icrp-safe

Fukushima Residents Report Various Radiation Caused Illnesses.. via @AGreenRoad

When residents living in highly contaminated radiation zones complain about all of their health problems and early deaths, they are told it is all their fault, because they are worrying too much, and not smiling enough. But does that same thing apply to insects and animals as well? Can insects, plants and animals also worry too much, and not smile enough? 

Fukushima, Chernobyl, TMI Radiation Caused Mutations, Deformed Butterflies And Other Insects; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/10/mutant-deformed-butterflies-and.html

Over 50% of Horse Breeder's Foals Died in 2013 - 40 km from Fukushima - 200 Bq/kg Cesium Found In Femoral Muscle; via @AGreenroad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/10/over-50-of-horse-breeders-foals-died-in.html

ICRP, IAEA, AND OTHERS PROMOTE BOGUS THEORY THAT ONLY STRESS KILLS, BUT NOT RADIATION


The ICRP claims that much higher radiation exposures are still 'safe' and will cause no harm to anyone and that only stress, worry and fear is causing all of these increased health issues, cancers, birth defects and early deaths near nuclear disaster sites.  What happens when babies die? They don't have fear, stress and worry, do they? 

Birth Defect Rate Up 800% In Washington State, Officials Stumped - Not Considering Hanford Or Fukushima At All; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/birth-defect-rate-up-800-in-washington.html

Fukushima Radioactive Iodine Caused 28% Increase In Thyroid Problems, Babies/Infants Born After 3/11 In Alaska, Oregon, Hawaii, Oregon And Washington; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/10/fukushima-radioactive-iodine-caused-28.html

Radioactive Cesium Effect On The Human Placenta, Baby, Fetus, Embryo, Eggs, Sperm, and Children; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/09/radioactive-cesium-effect-on-human.html

Uranium And Other Radioactive Toxic Waste Found In Drinking Water Globally (James Beck MD); via A Green Road

Of course, the pro hormesis study is only pointed at by pro nuclear industry 'experts', since this claim of radiation causing no harm supports the nuclear industry and reduces legal liability, which is WHY they make this bold assertion.

ICRP TAKES MONEY FROM THE NUCLEAR UTILITIES IT IS REPORTING ON AND SETTING RULES FOR

ICRP represents itself as a pure, independent research body reporting on nuclear radiation, but quite the opposite is the case, just the same as the IAEA, and WHO (United Nations) organization, which takes it's orders from the IAEA, a marketing organization for the nuclear industry.

(WHO) World Health Organization Censored, Secretly Controlled By IAEA With Pro Nuclear Industry Control Agreement
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/05/who-is-iaea-what-does-iaea-do-who-funds.html

Outrage as AP exposes Japan scientists taking money from nuke industry — But we usually only fly coach so it’s OK — Radiation standards ‘twisted’ after 3/11 to limit evacuations - The doctor on the parliamentary panel, Hisako Sakiyama, is outraged about utility funding for Japan’s [International Commission on Radiological Protection] ICRP members. 

So let's repeat that statement... the ICRP is being PAID by the nuclear utilities that they report on. They are supposed independent 'experts' who then are relied on to protect the public with radiation safety laws. Would you ever bite the hand that feeds you? Would a salesperson for a sugar company ever say that sugar was bad for your health?

Wouldn't you agree that at the very least, that this cozy financial relationship which also exists with the IAEA would create a bias, and at the very worst, would create a report that is in favor of the company making the payments, with a goal of getting a certain result, while ignoring the actual data or harm caused?

How can the corrupted and industry captive IAEA and ICRP organizations set the 'rules' for radiation exposure and safety, when in effect they are the sales and marketing organizations for the nuclear industry?

ACTUAL STATISTICS DO NOT SUPPORT ICRP CONCLUSIONS


Here is just one example of many examples of how wrong the ICRP is with their claims of no harm from low dose radiation from nuclear accidents....  After Chernobyl, the cancer rate in Sweden has gone up, way beyond the estimation of ICRP prediction. In one area of Sweden, where low dose radiation has affected residents due to Chernobyl, the cancer rate is increasing. The annual radiation dose is only 0.2 mSv, which is 1/5 of the minimum ICRP standard that can cause any cancers or diseases, according to them. According to researchers, the cancer risk of those exposed to only .2 mSv has increased by 34% annually. For more information about this, follow the link...
http://enenews.com/report-nhk-starting-broadcast-truth-large-increase-brain-tumors-cancer-nuke-plant-everyone-died-im-alive-killing-govt-kept-telling-icrp-safe

This is not the only example of harm caused by nuclear power plant accidents. There are many, many more, but they are being suppressed and denied by this small group of pro nuclear scientists, and the mass media, which is owned by huge corporations who like to keep this kind of news off the air, because it hurts the advertising revenue that comes from these organizations, if it is aired.

Nuclear Power Plant Studies Show Child Leukemia, Breast, Thyroid Cancer Rates Increase RADICALLY Closer To Plants; via @AGreenRoad

Fukushima also caused an increase in cancers, but the medical/nuclear industry is covering it all up. Since 3/11, the thyroid cancer rate has been increasing, but the researchers are looking for a link with fire retardant clothing, not Fukushima low dose radiation. How silly is that?
http://www.healthcanal.com/cancers/46336-ysph-researcher-explores-link-between-flame-retardants-and-thyroid-cancer.html

Communication by: Dr. Paul Lannoye (Belgium), Honorary Member of European Parliament (1989­2004), member of the Commission on Health, Environment and Consumer Protection

Title: Why have the risks from exposure to radioactivity always been underestimated? 

- In 1952, when President Eisenhower launched the ‘Atoms for Peace’ programme, it was intended to convince the world of the benefits of nuclear energy. 

- The ICRP, which was set up during this same period, was responsible for working in this area to establish safety standards for radiological protection. This led to the adoption of three basic principles: justification (the usefulness of a practice resulting in exposure, optimisation (ALARA, As Low As Reasonably Achievable) and limitation). Limitation involves adopting safety ­limits in line with “acceptable” risk. 

- Having remained silent during the era of atmospheric nuclear testing, the ICRP has, over time, lowered the safety limits but continues to use a gross approximation for judging the risks from internal contamination. 

- The successive adjustments to the norms, prompted by observed data, have always been adopted reluctantly and long after the scientific validation of the observations. 

- The latest publication (2007) by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) takes no account of the work that has been carried out in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus since Chernobyl. The discrepancy between the norms that are in force and the risks that can be observed has increased dangerously, as is clearly and thoroughly demonstrated by the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR).
http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf

ICRP NOT QUALIFIED TO ASSESS EFFECTS ON BIOLOGICAL ORGANISMS, OR PEOPLE


Wyakin July 12, 2014  "The problem with physicists and those who to profess to be "nuclear experts," is they incorrectly think they are qualified to assess the effects of radiation on biological organisms. Nothing could be further from the truth, then false assurances based on fraudulent science. Anyone interested in a frank assessment of the IRPC should look at the ECRR 2010 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk:
http://www.euradcom.org/2011/ecrr2010.pdf

It provides a rather unflattering view of the ICRP as an organization as well as a useful critique of the ICRP low dose models. The contributors are several dozen eminently qualified individuals on the subject of the effects of radiation on biological organisms. The ICRP model is based on reductionist physics-based arguments, which is presently used to set legislation on exposure limits and argue that low-level radiation is safe. It is not based in inductive mechanistic/epidemiological science. Such hubris and arrogance.

Enough evidence is available to show that low-level exposure to man-made radioactive material causes ill health, and that the conventional models of the ICRP and other agencies, which used the same radiation risk models, entirely fail to predict these effects. The only reason why the existing paradigm remains is that it supports corporate nuclear profit goals. No amount of BS or propaganda will cover that up."

ICRP PROMOTES HIGHEST AMOUNT OF RADIATION AT LOWEST POSSIBLE CORPORATE COST


Via Wyakin July 10, 2014 "The evidence has been in our collective faces for decades, covered by many luminaries, including but not limited to, Gould, Goldman, Gofman and Sternglass.

Nuclear fission is a pathetic and failed technology.

No amount of propaganda will ever change this reality. We all know radiation has caused a range of diseases. The carcinogenic, teratogenic and mutagenic effects of this wretched technology will never be obscured. Not even a half-wit soccer coach nuclear physicist will change the course of reality with a pile of falsehoods designed to protect his job.

I’ve been a longtime critic of the ICRP, NRPB, UNSCEAR, BEIR, NCRP. The adoption of radiation models which are intended to support highest levels of radiation exposure to humans at the lowest corporate cost, is unconscionable.

The blatant cronyism that is characteristic of nuclear apologists should make everyone embarrassed to be human beings.

These models not only are pathetically, and intentionally, not equipped to account for the effects of exposure to low level radiation, they generally consider only effects resulting in fatal cancers, heritable damage, and IQ retardation.

Moronic subtleties should never be overlooked. We have epidemiological studies which have irrefutably produced and scientifically demonstrated evidence of a wide range of health effects other than cancer from radiation.

Humans have 2 generally recognized cell lines, germ and somatic cells. The effects of all levels of radiation affect these cell lines and their intended purpose in predictable chronic or fatal manners."

ICRP MINIMIZES HEALTH CONSEQUENCES


Via Wyakin July 10, 2014 "To put the ongoing genocide for profit in perspective, consider the following: ICRP has estimated that thru 2000 there has been 1,173,600 fatal cancers and 2,350,000 induced cancers.

In contrast, the European Commission on Radiation Risk has estimated 61,619,512 fatal cancers, and 123,239,024 induced cancers. The clandestine alliance between regulators and propagators has introduced malfeasant science into the scam of radiation protection.

Who do you believe? The lying corporate liars who are willing to sacrifice us all, including the most genetically vulnerable, women and children, or the ECRR and others who can scientifically prove the nuclear industry and government cronies are always understating the quantity and amount of nuclear trash being spread by the global nuclear industrial and military complex?"

Radiation In Food/Water/Products, Geiger Counters, Dosimeters, Test Labs, Radiation Readings, Conversions
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/low-level-nuclear-radiation-in-food-and.html

ICRP CANCER RISK MODEL DOES NOT WORK AT ALL


Via Jebus July 24, 2014  Stuck in Second Low Internal Dose Cancer Risk
The problem, according to independent researchers, is that the ICRP risk model underestimates the cancer risk from certain low dose internal emitters like Tritium, Strontium-90, and Uranium sometimes by a factor 100 or more. The ICRP risk model underestimates the biological effects of Strontium-90 because it does not recognize the high affinity for DNA or its knock-out punch delivered by the subsequent decay of Yttrium-90 while the same cell is in the repair stage. Damaged DNA elevates the cancer risk and the risk of passing genetic defects to offspring. Natural radioactive Potassium-40 in bananas does far less damage to cells and has never been found to be carcinogenic like Strontium-90.
http://www.environmental-defense-institute.org/publications/News.14.Mar.-Final.pdf

Individual Radioactive Elements/Isotopes, USA Radiation, Radiation Exposure Prevention, Reversal, Chelation
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/individual-radioactive-elementsisotopes.html

JAPANESE GOVERNMENT MOVING CITIZENS BACK INTO HIGHLY RADIATION CONTAMINATED AREAS


The Japanese government is going so far as to move people back into highly radiation contaminated zones, while claiming it is safe. They are backed up by the pro nuclear scientists and medical professionals who believe that hormesis is a good thing.. They believe that the more radiation one is exposed to, the more healthy people become.

2014 - Japanese Government Moving People Into Areas with Up To 10 Times Maximum Nuclear Workers Annual Radiation Exposure Limit; via @AGreenRoad

What is happening around nuclear facilities is criminal. What is happening around nuclear accident sites with people living in highly radiation contaminated areas is criminal. Why aren't people going to jail? Why aren't these hormesis promoting hucksters going to jail? The reason is because not enough people know about what you now know and understand. Educate the people around you. Educate your legislator, and that will make a difference. 

THE CLOSED CULT LIKE GROUPS: IAEA, ICRP, UNSCEAR, WHO

Bottom line, the various agencies and groups that promote nuclear power such as the IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR and ICRP all have the same membership; a small group of several hundred pro nuclear scientists. Their goals all seem to be about protecting the nuclear industry, at any cost, no matter what they have to do or say, or event turn a blind eye. 

The IAEA is actually a nuclear industry marketing organization, like the milk marketing board. These groups who are staffed by the same people, have their primary purpose to promote the nuclear industry, and nothing else. 

IAEA, ICRP And UNSCEAR Are All Staffed By The Same Pro Nuclear Industry Apologists

Nuclear Controversies Movie Exposes IAEA, WHO, UN, CEA, UNSCEAR Corruption

WHO/IAEA Collusion - Negative Health Impact of Fukushima On Children: Warnings and Recommendations by Michel Fernex; via @AGreenRoad 

NISA, IAEA, WHO, Plus Pro Nuclear Government Politicians Covering Up And Minimizing Negative Effects From Nuclear Accidents; via @AGreenRoad 
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/10/governments-covering-up-and-minimizing.html

DOCUMENTARY MOVIE EXPOSES COVER UP BY NUCLEAR 'EXPERTS' AT INTERNATIONAL FORUM, IN PLAIN SIGHT FOR EVERYONE TO SEE AND HEAR


A 51 minute documentary movie by Wladimir Tchertkoff (2003). In June 2001 in Kiev, the nuclear based experts of the IAEA and WHO maintain that the catastrophe of Tchernobyl made only 31 died “approximately”…  Click on; Nuclear Controversies by IndependentWHO

What is the take away? It is better to get an independent medical or scientific researcher outside of this small closed group of pro nuclear scientists to get REAL radiation data and information, because all you will hear from these small, closed, myopic and faux pro nuclear groups is a unified message that all radiation is safe, and it never hurts anyone, no matter what. 

WHAT YOU CAN DO; RESEARCH THE DARK SIDE OF THE NUCLEAR MONOPOLY

A Green Road Journal has the largest, most organized, deepest set of articles, videos and pictures exposing the dark side of the nuclear monopoly in the world.

Zero Nuclear Weapons Peace And Justice Project; First Strike Policy, Ban Nuclear Bombs, DU, Down Winders, Acute Radiation Sickness, Nuclear War, Dirty Bombs, Bomb Shelters

Zero Rads In Children And Adults Eco Justice Project - Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Radiation Exposure

Zero Rads Extraction Eco Justice Project; Uranium Mining, Enrichment, Nuclear Fuel Chain, Open Air Testing, Fracking

Zero Internal Rads Eco Justice Project; Negative Effects Of Internal Radiation Exposure, Risk Models, Hormesis, Radiophobia, Radiation Monitoring Networks

Making Invisible Heavy Metal Radioactive Poison Visible Eco Justice Project; Ionizing Heavy Metal Poisonous Radiation In Food/Water/Products, Geiger Counters, Dosimeters, Radiation Readings, Test Labs, Conversions, Global Detector Network

Zero Harm To Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants Eco Justice Project; Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Heavy Metal Radioactive Poisons In Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants

Zero Nuclear Power Plant Threat Eco Justice Project; Accidents, Recycling Nuclear Fuel, Movie Reviews, Next Generation Nuclear Plants, Terrorists

Radiation Research, Education, Database Eco Justice Project; Individual Radioactive Elements/Isotopes, USA Radiation, Radiation Exposure Prevention, Reversal, Chelation

Eco Justice Art - Artists As Activists; Art, Aging, Poetry, Lyrics And Lawsuits Project; Lawsuits, Aging Nuclear Reactors, Recertification, Music, Lyrics, Poetry

Zero Rad Waste Eco Justice Project; Long Term Storage Of Nuclear Waste, Decommissioning, Ocean Dumping, Incineration, Decontamination, Water Contamination, Dry Cask Storage

WHAT YOU CAN DO; ENDORSE, LEARN, TRANSFORM, DONATE, SHARE, SUPPORT, SPONSOR, CONNECT, COMMENT, AND/OR COLLABORATE

DONATE

Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Donate To A Green Road Project; Help Dr. Goodheart Teach How To Make A Positive Difference For Seven Future Generations Of Children, Animals, Plants And The Planet

TRANSLATE

Click to Translate; 60 languages - German, French, Russian, Spanish

JOIN THE NETWORK OF OTHER ACTIVISTS; PLUG INTO AGRP


* Join the AGR Network. Forward this or any other article by clicking on the social media facebook, google plus and/or twitter buttons below any AGRP article. The first step for activists is to bring awareness of an issue to the public, by being informed yourself. Which news and information network do you prefer to plug into and network with?








 Email AGRP

RSS Feed

Subscribe to; A Green Road Project Magazine, monthly issues
It is easy to join the AGRP network, and your email will never be rented, sold or shared.

Subscribe/sign up, give feedback, or offer news tips or story ideas by sending an email to agreenroad@gmail.com . Subscribe by typing the word subscribe in the subject line.

COPYRIGHT

Wayne Dyer - What You Think, You Become (Wayne Dyer Meditation)

"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:www.lawcornel.edu/uscode.

Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.

WHAT YOU CAN DO: SHARE THIS ARTICLE

A Green Road; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. 

Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? 

Support AGR and share this article via by copying and pasting title and url into;

Website and contact page

Index, Table Of Contents

End

ICRP [International Commission on Radiological Protection] Caught Manipulating And 'Faking' Scientific Data - Is There Censorship Of Truth And Perverting Science For Profit And Power Inside Of The Nuclear Monopoly? Promotes Quack Hormesis Theory - Faked, Manufactured 'Consensus'
https://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/05/icrp-international-commission-on.html



Reactions:
Share this post: