Share this post:
Unlike Cliven Bundy, Mary And Carrie Dann Sisters Had Land, Cattle, But No Guns, So BLM Forcibly Took Their Land, Home And All Their Cattle - Japanese US Citizens Forced Into US Prison Camps - Black Panthers Assassinated - List of Indian Massacres, Wounded Knee - Original Founding Fathers


REP. MATT SHEA ENGAGED IN DOMESTIC TERRORISM AGAINST US GOVERNMENT, WHICH IS DEFINED AS TREASON


Washington Rep. Matt Shea engaged in domestic terrorism against U.S., says state House report | The Seattle Times
State Rep. Matt Shea planned and participated in domestic terrorism against the United States before and during the armed takeover at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, an investigation commissioned by the Washington state House found.

The 108-page report found that beginning in November 2015, Shea, working with militia leader Ammon Bundy, helped “in the planning and preparation” of the Malheur takeover, a six-week conflict in which dozens of armed protesters occupied the refuge in rural Eastern Oregon. The standoff ended after one protester was shot and killed and dozens were arrested.

“Representative Shea, as a leader in the Patriot Movement, planned, engaged in and promoted a total of three armed conflicts of political violence against the United States Government in three states outside the state of Washington over a three-year period,” according to the report released Thursday. “In one conflict Representative Shea led covert strategic pre-planning in advance of the conflict.”

WHO ARE THE ORIGINAL FOUNDING FATHERS, AND WHY DO THEY GET NO RESPECT, NO ATTENTION, NO MASS MEDIA COVERAGE, NOR INSTRUCTION TIME IN SCHOOLS, COLLEGES? 

Original Founding Fathers – David Behrens Art
The term “founding fathers” can be traced back to most of our adolescent years when our social studies teacher used it to define the early presidents and their various documents that forged and formed this great and powerful nation we live in today. What we weren’t taught was that before the first American president there was already a system and order decreed by renown Native American elders and chieftains.

Chief Joseph for example lived a life that personified his courageous beliefs. Joseph, a Nez Perce, grew up in Oregon’s Wallowa Valley, a region that his ancestors occupied for centuries. In 1874 the U.S. government ordered his people to resettle in Idaho. In the month of June 1877, Joseph began leading his people to Idaho in peace, but on the way found himself confronted by some hostile whites. Gunfire was exchanged which eventually escalated to an all out war with the United States. For 1,800 miles Chief Joseph courageously led 800 men, women and children to a Canadian refuge but was pursued closely by the U.S. Calvary. Ambushed only 42 miles from their destination and with only 418 of his survivors he bellowed this unforgettable lament, “I will fight no more forever.”

Sitting Bull, a Hunkpapa Sioux, was not only known as a great warrior but a skilled hunter as well. Being a respected Sioux leader, one of his main objectives was to feed his people and lead them to the ever changing migrating buffalo herds. As he strove to fulfill his role, he was met by much resistance from the U.S. government. Eventually his zeal to make a way for his people met its fiercest opponent in General George Custer that soon took its toll resulting in the near extinction of the buffalo.


https://davidbehrensgallery.com/collections/original-founding-fathers

L-R:        Chief Joseph                      Sitting Bull                    Geronimo                 Red Cloud

THE MOST IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLIVEN BUNDY AND THE DANN SISTERS, IS THAT THE DANN SISTERS ACTUALLY OWNED THE LAND


TYT - Like Cliven Bundy, These Sisters Had Land, Cattle, But Not Guns

"The federal government's treatment of rancher Cliven Bundy, who has invoked land rights in his objection to paying grazing fees for his cattle, stands in stark contrast to what was done to the Dann sisters and other Indigenous Peoples on Shoshone territory when they did the same thing on lands that were unquestionably their own.

It was 1973 when the federal government first told Mary and Carrie Dann that they were "trespassing on public land," sparking a protracted paper war that eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court."* The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.

*Read more here from Indian Country Today Media Network:

Who Are Mary and Carrie Dann
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/M7OPX1wLURA  5 min

"101 Changemakers: Rebels and Radicals Who Changed US History," Edited by Michele Bollinger and Dao X. Tran, "#56: Mary and Carrie Dann," Written by Brian Ward

TAKING BY FORCE AND VIOLENCE IS A LONG, RACIST, WHITE SUPREMACIST STORY THAT IS STILL HAPPENING ALL AROUND THE WORLD


This same thing has been happening for a LONG, LONG time.. Taking things by force, intimidation, violence and with weapons is something that there is a long history of in this country. But the story is universal, as indigenous peoples all around the world are fighting this same battle, in the same way, and for the same reasons. 

These ancient and very wise, honorable people don't want the land abused, spoiled, polluted or used for short term profit. They look at 7 future generations and what works for them without causing harm. They do what is right for them, rather than just at what is profitable short term. 

So far, so called 'civilized' countries have not learned this lesson, and will suffer for it, because this is a violation of Natural Laws, and the consequences of forced violent taking are severe.

JOHN MCCAIN HELPED MINING CORPORATION STEAL APACHE LAND; SAME OLD, SAME OLD RACIST, WHITE SUPREMACIST THEFT FROM INDIGENOUS PEOPLE



Time Is Short February 4, 2015 "John McCain led that giveaway to Rio Tinto.

'John McCain and Congress helping mining company steal ancestral, ceremonial Apache land'

Who is one major investor in Rio Tinto?

'UK Queen in Depleted Uranium Trade – Her Fortune is £17 Billion'

Rio Tinto is also a large uranium miner, possibly the largest.

Hmm."

LAND: A part of the earth’s surface, considered as property. The theory that land is property subject to private ownership and control is the foundation of modern society, and is eminently worthy of the superstructure. Carried to its logical conclusion, it means that some have the right to prevent others from living. 

Ambrose Bierce

CLIVEN BUNDY DOES NOT SEE THAT THE US GOVERNMENT EVEN EXISTS, MUCH LESS THAT IT HAS AUTHORITY OVER HIM


GRAZED AND CONFUSED - HANNITY OBSESSION

In contradiction to his unwavering patriotism, Sean Hannity's support of an anarchist rancher goes against the principles of the founding fathers he admires so much.

And yet, you, the uber-American, this man is your cause?

CLIVEN BUNDY (4/10/2014): I don't recognize the United States government as even existing.

He doesn't recognize America's existence! He's a U.S.A.-theist! (audience laughter) Cuz the federal government does exist. In fact, it was created by those guys and that document you love so, so much.

SEAN HANNITY (2/5/2014): I love Washington because he gave up power. Amazing to me, when he could have held on to it.

Washington. Now there's a Founding Father who could found the shit out of everyone. How do you think he would handle an armed group of federal government rejectionists who wouldn't pay their taxes? Well, we don't really need to speculate, because it was called the Whiskey Rebellion. And Washington, with his federal army, crushed it in 1794. I guess you would say, disproportionately. (audience laughter)

And the reason he was legally allowed to do that was because a man named Daniel Shays pulled the same shit in 1786 and 1787.

THE UGLY SIDE OF THE BUNDY STANDOFF

This is not the first time that guns and violence have been used in this way.. Ruby Ridge is another episode of this same type of thing..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge

TYT - Cops Investigating Death Threats By Bundy Ranch Militia
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/y5TG8P5Wd-I  5 5min

Consider what happened at the Bundy standoff, with multiple government agencies involved, all of them armed to the teeth, standing off against white, armed to the teeth white militia members. What do you think would have happened if these militia members had been American Indians, or Black people in the middle of a city, or Chinese militia groups facing off against the government and/or police in San Francisco?

Do you think it would have ended peacefully, as it did in this case, more by luck than by design?

LIST OF WHITE SUPREMACIST, NATIONALIST, RACIST ORGANIZATIONS


White, armed to the teeth nationalist groups are located all around the world..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_white_nationalist_organizations

CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AROUND BLM 'OWNING' AND CONTROLLING ALL RIGHTS TO LAND


Both the Dann sisters and potentially also the Bundy case bring up some issues that need debating and much more discussion in a public forum, free of politics.  There are some universal issues that need to be addressed here, and historical issues that should be aired out in public. Maybe it is time to heal these very old wounds and start by apologizing in public for the harm that has been caused, not just in the USA, but all around the world?

LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY DANN SISTERS AND BUNDY INCIDENT


Where does a person go to address illegal taking of land or property by a government? Certainly a person with no money or assets cannot sue in local or state court venues, because expensive lawyers are required to have even a remote chance of winning.

Small claims court does not allow lawyers, but the total claim amount is limited to several thousand dollars, so that forum is out. The federal government has unlimited lawyers and resources on their side, and the average citizen has nothing to fight with, so the fight is unfair, right from the word go.

If a person cannot go to a regular court in a way that does not involve lawyers (like small claims court) and that has a regular jury of peers to contest land use or ownership rights, nor can they contest Constitutional issues in a lawful court of law, is there still a Constitution? Are there still rights? Is there still freedom?

Ideally, a government agency will follow the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, as well as local, state as well as federal laws, but what if they don't? What if a government forcibly takes land from people like the Dann sisters, or anyone else for that matter? What if they overstep their legal authority and take something that they have no right to?

Where does the average person go to complain or get redress for harm or value of things taken, if the law does not allow such grievance to be aired to anyone but the agency doing the act? Of course, the government agency will deny all claims and not pay anything, or they would not have done the taking in the first place. And if Congress is involved in the taking, due to behind the scenes 'donations' from corporations to the politicians election campaign, then there is really no avenue left, correct? 

Where does a citizen go to fight back against an agency like the BLM, EPA, or other government agency, if their property rights, Constitutional rights, or freedoms have been violated? 

WHAT IF BLACK PEOPLE HAD BEEN STANDING OFF AGAINST THE POLICE WITH WEAPONS?

What are the odds that a stand off of black males with guns against mostly white law enforcement would have ended peacefully, no matter what their affiliation with any group was? Here is one example of what happens when minorities arm themselves and try to stand up for their Constitutional 'rights' and freedom....

Black Panther Party; (exact equivalent of the white militia groups)
Wikipedia; "Federal Bureau of Investigation Director J. Edgar Hoover called the Black Panther party "the greatest threat to the internal security of the country",[7] and he supervised an extensive program (COINTELPRO) of surveillance, infiltration, perjury, police harassment, and many other tactics designed to undermine Panther leadership, incriminate party members, discredit and criminalize the Party, and drain the organization of resources and manpower. The program was also accused of using assassination against Black Panther members.[8][9][10][11]

Government repression initially contributed to the growth of the party as killings and arrests of Panthers increased support for the party within the black community and on the broad political left, both of whom valued the Panthers as powerful force opposed to de facto segregation and the military draft. 

In Chicago, on December 4, 1969, two Panthers were killed when the Chicago Police raided the home of Panther leader Fred Hampton. The raid had been orchestrated by the police in conjunction with the FBI. Hampton was shot and killed, as was Panther guard Mark Clark. A federal investigation reported that only one shot was fired by the Panthers, and police fired at least 80 shots.[93] Hampton was subsequently shot twice in the head at point blank range while unconscious

He was 21 years old and unarmed at the time of his murder. Coroner reports show that Hampton was drugged with a powerful barbiturate that night and all indicators point toward FBI infiltrator William O'Neal as the source of the drugging.[94] Cook County State's Attorney Edward Hanrahan, his assistant and eight Chicago police officers were indicted by a federal grand jury over the raid, but the charges were later dismissed.[77][95] In 1979 civil action, Hampton's family won $1.85 million from the city of Chicago in a wrongful death settlement.[96]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Panther_Party

Again, there is a very long history of whites enslaving and oppressing blacks.

WHAT IF AMERICAN INDIANS HAD BEEN STANDING OFF AGAINST POLICE AND BLM WITH WEAPONS?

Wikipedia; "Wounded Knee Massacre
....About 200 AIM and Oglala Lakota activists occupied the hamlet of Wounded Knee on February 27, 1973. They demanded the removal of Wilson, restoration of treaty negotiations with the U.S. government, and correction of U.S. failures to enforce treaty rights. Visits by the U.S. senators from South Dakota, FBI agents and United States Department of Justice (DOJ) representatives, were attended by widespread media coverage, but the Richard Nixon administration was preoccupied internally with Watergate.[22]

As the events evolved, the activists at Wounded Knee had a 71-day armed stand-off with U.S. law enforcement. AIM leaders at the site were Russell Means, Dennis Banks and Carter Camp; traditional spiritual leaders of the Lakota, such as Frank Fools Crow, were also prominent. Fools Crow led Oglala Lakota spiritual ceremonies and practice in their ways for participants.[22] Joseph H. Trimbach of the FBI and Steve Frizell of DOJ led the government.[22]

Casualties of gunfire included a U.S. Marshal, who was seriously wounded and paralyzed; and the deaths of Frank Clearwater, a Cherokee from North Carolina, and Buddy Lamont, a local Oglala Lakota. After Lamont's death, the Oglala Lakota elders called an end to the occupation.[22] Some Lakota have alleged that Ray Robinson, a civil rights activist, was killed during the Wounded Knee occupation, as he disappeared there.[27]"
[28]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Ridge_Indian_Reservation#Wounded_Knee_Massacre

This massacre was just the latest in a loonnnnngggggg series of massacres going way back to the beginning, when white 'settlers' arrived in a land that they deemed to be 'unoccupied, despite millions of people living there for tens of thousands of years in a sustainable fashion. Or, should they be called 'occupiers', who came in and took the land away from the original Indian inhabitants and citizens of the Iroquois Confederacy by force?

LIST OF INDIAN MASSACRES


List of Indian Massacres
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_massacre


WHAT IF JAPANESE PEOPLE HAD BEEN STANDING OFF AGAINST POLICE WITH WEAPONS? 

What would have happened if a large group of armed Japanese people had stood off against white armed police and government officers? Would it have ended peacefully? 

Wikipedia; "The internment of Japanese Americans in the United States was the forced relocation and incarceration during World War II of between 110,000 and 120,000[2] people of Japanese ancestry who lived on the Pacific coast in camps in the interior of the country. Sixty-two percent of the internees were United States citizens.[3][4] The U.S. government ordered the removal of Japanese Americans in 1942, shortly after Imperial Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor.[5]

Such incarceration was applied unequally due to differing population concentrations and, more importantly, state and regional politics: more than 110,000 Japanese Americans, nearly all who lived on the West Coast, were forced into interior camps, but in Hawaii, where the 150,000-plus Japanese Americans comprised over one-third of the population, only 1,200 to 1,800 were interned.[6] The forced relocation and incarceration has been determined to have resulted more from racism and discrimination among whites on the West Coast, rather than any military danger posed by the Japanese Americans."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_Japanese_Americans

There seems to be a pattern forming.. Do you see it yet? 

CORPORATIONS AND THE PROFIT MOTIVE BEHIND ALL OF THE FORCIBLE TAKING

When government agencies take from someone like the Dann sisters and then hand that same land over to gold or uranium mining companies right after the taking, it is very clear to the average person what is being done.

Historically, kings have always taken from the citizens in unlawful and illegal ways, either by sheer force, violence or threats. How is the taking of the Dann sisters land any different than what happened under King George in England, or under any other despot or dictator in any other country? 

The underlying motive underneath just about all of the taking is selfish greed/absolute power. But what drives the taking in the US is a belief that short term profits are not only legal, but morally required for a healthy GDP, and a free market economy.

Add on a religious justification via a manifest destiny, which assumes primary 'rule' over all other peoples, religions, and ways of life, and you have a combination that destroys the planet, justifies genocide as necessary, and condones violent taking at all costs, with no regard for long term consequences. Is this kind of system sustainable? 

PREDATORY CAPITALISM DEMANDS MILLIONS OF PEOPLE BE SACRIFICED


Huge corporations have combined forces behind the scenes to take over and control politicians or governments all around the world, including Communist China. The dark motives of the 1% who control most of the wealth, land, and resources is to extract by force as much wealth as they can, while increasing their power to the maximum extent possible.

All around the world, the methods used are the same. Taking by force is justified in order to 'feed' the needs of corporations, who stand in the shadows pulling the strings of a corrupted by money form of government. 

Of course, since the 1% are the 'job creators', they do not see fit to pay anyone compensation for the forcible 'taking', raping, killing and destruction, since they are doing it all in the name of Molech. Sacrificing children on an alter has not been abolished, it has just changed form and been hidden away behind some dark curtains, and invisible poisons are used instead of knives on an alter. 


SACRIFICE ZONES ARE SPREADING AND GROWING GLOBALLY, ALL FOR PROFIT AND ABSOLUTE POWER SAKE


If a corporation is not involved with nuclear 'fires', and sacrificing people that way, then they are sacrificing people for something that is even more powerful than that; the Golden Calf. What used to be justified as a war on Communism has now morphed into a war on the peoples of the world and the environment, in a free for all that has combined the power of huge globalist corporations with the absolute top down power of Communism. Now partners in crime, the people of the world are the prey and victims. 


Historically, the focus of this sacrificial corporate machine was aimed primarily at third world countries. What has changed now is that this corporate machine is now targeting the white middle class, the former slave owners and 'takers' who 'settled' this and other countries. Like all dictators, the 1% start by targeting the weakest, most vulnerable minorities, but eventually end up targeting everyone. The 99% is now the target, and Bundy is just one tiny example of this absolute power expressing itself.  

Bundy is a good example of how the former privileged white citizen is now a target of the Matrix like machine. 

SELFISH SHORT TERM PROFIT MOTIVE CELEBRATED AND JUSTIFIED


Many millions of people, species and the whole world must be sacrificed in order to feed the Golden Calf. Selfishness is celebrated, but morality and ethics are thrown into the sacrificial fires. 

The proponents of a free market love to claim the territory of freedom, but they use oppression and brutality to squash any competition. Any real freedom is outlawed in the name of absolute control/power, which then generates huge profits.

SUMMARY


A spiritually bankrupt and empty ego plus greed is always hungry, never gets enough, and no matter how much it is given, it always wants/takes more. A 'souled out' ego has a habit of destroying anything and everything it touches, no matter how much it tries to do the opposite. 

The foundation stone of modern civilization is built in part on ego and greed. The problem with a pure ego ruling at the top of any organization, is like building a home on quicksand; it can never stand. The only thing standing between absolute power and control of the 1% are local communities. 

To have any hope of surviving long term, spirituality, interfaith religion, morals and ethics must be taught in all schools. A focus must be included that includes 7 generations in all decisions and laws, so that they are not harmed. 


quantumthunder Dad was 1st Marines as a tank commander and decorated as well as a Purple Heart in Korea and did Army Reserves. My mother's two elder brothers are WW II, one Navy with Purple Heart, one Army and decorated (one a Bronze Star for bravery!) who also did a tour in Korea. My time in Nam in Air Force was one tour and GTFO, because the three all told me the same thing: If you think your leaders give a rusty fig about anything other than lining their pockets and lusting for every day they can exert control/power over you/others, you're brainwashed on their Kool Aid. Didn't quite believe them so stupid me had to join up and get front row seat."


MUSIC/ART ACTIVISM


Roger Waters - Perfect Sense
MUSIC VIDEOhttps://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Roger+Waters+Perfect+Sense

Cant you see it all makes perfect sense expressed in Dollars and Cents Pounds Shillings and pence Oh cant you see it all makes perfect sense

WHAT YOU CAN DO; ENDORSE, LEARN, TRANSFORM, DONATE, SHARE, SUPPORT, SPONSOR, CONNECT, COMMENT, AND/OR COLLABORATE

DONATE

Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Donate To A Green Road Project; Help Dr. Goodheart Teach How To Make A Positive Difference For Seven Future Generations Of Children, Animals, Plants And The Planet

TRANSLATE

Click to Translate; 60 languages - German, French, Russian, Spanish

JOIN THE NETWORK OF OTHER ACTIVISTS; PLUG INTO AGRP


* Join the AGR Network. Forward this or any other article by clicking on the social media facebook, google plus and/or twitter buttons below any AGRP article. The first step for activists is to bring awareness of an issue to the public, by being informed yourself. Which news and information network do you prefer to plug into and network with?








 Email AGRP

RSS Feed

Subscribe to; A Green Road Project Magazine, monthly issues
It is easy to join the AGRP network, and your email will never be rented, sold or shared.

Subscribe/sign up, give feedback, or offer news tips or story ideas by sending an email to agreenroad@gmail.com . Subscribe by typing the word subscribe in the subject line.

COPYRIGHT

Wayne Dyer - What You Think, You Become (Wayne Dyer Meditation)

"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:www.lawcornel.edu/uscode.

Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.

WHAT YOU CAN DO: SHARE THIS ARTICLE

A Green Road; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. 

Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? 

Support AGR and share this article via by copying and pasting title and url into;

Website and contact page

Index, Table Of Contents

End


Unlike Cliven Bundy, Mary And Carrie Dann Sisters Had Land, Cattle, But No Guns, So BLM Forcibly Took Their Land, Home And All Their Cattle - Japanese US Citizens Forced Into US Prison Camps - Black Panthers Assassinated - List of Indian Massacres, Wounded Knee - Original Founding Fathers
Reactions:
Share this post: