Share this post:
Global World Peace Plan; Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 - Living Consciously And With Clear Intent, In A World Free Of War Takes Thought, Words And Then Action; Either We Create Global Peace, Or We Are Destroying All Life On The Planet Via WWIII

THOSE WHO DO NOT LEARN FROM THE LESSONS OF HISTORY ARE CONDEMNED TO REPEAT THEM AND SUFFER AN EVEN WORSE FATE, BECAUSE THE LESSONS GET HARDER THE MORE OFTEN THEY HAVE TO BE REPEATED


Do we ever learn the lessons of history? 98 year-old Ben Ferencz is the last surviving prosecutor from the Nuremberg trials. 

Listen to more here: http://bbc.in/2nAyfkH


Lessons from the Tragedy of Woodrow Wilson’s War
"President Trump said yesterday that gas attacks on innocents in Syria had “changed his mind” about the situation there. U.S. Marines and soldiers, including conventional artillery units and copter-borne forces, are already on the ground in Syria, as well as more of them now in Iraq. Meanwhile, Mr. Trump said as well that he might choose to take the lead on North Korea (pre-empting China), clearly threatening a first strike there. Additionally, Mr. Trump’s Defense Secretary, General Mattis, has decried ISIS but also asserted that ISIS’ mortal enemy Iran must be checked in the Middle East, and he has openly ruminated about the boarding of Iranian ships in the Persian Gulf.

Does the Trump Administration seriously think it wise to contemplate simultaneous American-led wars against Syria, ISIS, Iran, and North Korea in the current moment? Especially when none of them pose even the remotest threat to North American security? And when all of them are threats to others, if at all, such that any kinetic move against them would, once again, as in World War I, represent Americans’ fighting and dying on behalf of other countries in conflicts where there is no direct linkage to the national security of the United States?

Let us be starkly clear in our closing thought: America went to war 100 years ago today for no good reason, and certainly not for the “general interest” of national security. Instead, Mr. Wilson wanted war for the sake of narrow special interests contained in what President Eisenhower was to later call the “military-industrial-congressional complex.” This panoply of overlapping Beltway groups or individuals, coupled with the “ruling class elite” who toil in Manhattan boardrooms, or those of major defense contractors and industrial supplier firms around the country, is still alive and well today. These groups can all do great things on their own, on behalf of the American people, as the case may be. But never again should an American soldier or Marine be asked to die, face down in the mud, thousands of miles away from the borders he is paid to defend, for anything less than a lethal threat to our national security. Nor should hard-pressed American taxpayers foot the bill for the wars of others. THAT is the primordial lesson of April 6, 1917, which reverberates through time and still resonates today.
http://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2017/04/06/lessons_from_the_tragedy_of_woodrow_wilsons_war_111118.html?

WHAT CAN JUST ABOUT EVERYONE (99.999) AGREE ON AND REACH CONSENSUS WITH?

Everyone desires/wants peace, both within themselves, their own neighborhood, city, state, their own country and globally, wouldn't you agree? Even soldiers fighting in a war (on both sides) want peace. If you disagree, ask around and see what kinds of answer you get to this question among your co workers, friends, family and neighbors.

Ask the question; do you desire/want peace?

Everyone agrees that in concept and theoretically, a peaceful world is better than a world filled with war, armies and weapons of mass destruction, wouldn't you agree? 

Reducing the risk of global war, including the risk posed by weapons of mass destruction, such as biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, is also a good idea, wouldn't you agree? 

Since there is consensus all around the world by a vast majority of 99.999 percent of everyone in the population that peace is desirable and reducing the risk posed by WMD is desirable and worth doing, wouldn't it make sense to have a WRITTEN PLAN for this and then implement the plan, by taking ACTION? 

Have you ever accomplished a really large project by just sitting and watching TV, or sleeping? 

It is not possible to reach a goal without planning, writing down the plan and then implementing it.

Every goal takes not just thinking, but words, and then action.

Of course, there are those who are bent on global destruction, violence and causing death, disease plus suffering. Our choice is to either join them in the rush to global suicide and personal suffering, or to transform the world and choose a different path.. 

Don't start down the road to the dark side... 

How The Dark Side Ensnares And Traps People; Don't Even Start Down The Road, Don't Accept The First Invitation
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/12/how-dark-side-ensnares-and-traps-people.html

THERE ARE THREE UNIVERSAL STEPS TO REACHING ANY GOAL


Everything in life follows the same pattern to reach a goal, whether the goal is small or really large;

First; there is a thought or idea. 

Second;  this thought or idea is put into words. 

Third, this idea, thought or concept is debated among the people involved in making it happen. Once consensus or a majority vote is reached, action is taken. This happens both in local government, county government, state government, federal government and internationally. Unless someone does not believe in government at all (Anarchy), this is the way humans have organized taking a thought like global peace, and then putting it into action.

In summary, everything always proceeds from thought, then into words and then into action. So if global peace is the idea, then we are now putting the words (global peace) down on paper, as well as speaking the words (global peace), and the next step is actually taking action. How would this goal of global peace be achieved?

THERE ARE TWO WAYS TO ACHIEVE ANY GOAL, EITHER WITH DESTRUCTION OR CREATION


There are two ways to achieve any goal, and that is either through hatred, force, intimidation, violence, destruction and (war) or via love, agreement and creation (peace). The alternatives involve either escalating hate/fear, or increasing love and forgiveness. This basic choice is underneath all written down plans.

Hating others and then destroying the whole world via a nuclear war, killing everyone and all life on the planet, would certainly attain the goal of world peace, but how many people would want to achieve the goal this way? With no life left on Earth, it would certainly be peaceful.

Any small group can plan a world peace through a hostile take over and forcibly mandating a method that they have chosen for everyone, but then that would not last long, because no international agreement was reached, correct?

So far, the global village that is us has reached agreement that global peace requires a plan, that it must be accomplished via peaceful methods and that an international agreement is required in order for it to last and actual work in a sustainable manner, wouldn't you agree? Religions have MUCH more in common than they believe.

Commonality Of All Religions, George Carlin; Mass Delusion, Projection, Need For More Interfaith Communications, Many Religions Have Miracles, Virgin Birth, Resurrection And Armageddon

A few people globally (the 1 percent) maybe want a destructive method via the military industrial complex or a top down 1 percent controlled method instituted by force of guns, or they might believe that they have been 'chosen' to live through a nuclear war that will accomplish their version of peace, but everyone else disagrees with this method of attaining the goal of world peace through destruction.

Mass Media Justice - Censored, Top Secret Whistle Blowing Project; Art And Science Of Deception, Global Corporations, ALEC, TPP, CIA, Journalism, The 1%, Whistleblowers, Voting, Elections, Solutions

Wouldn't you agree that humanity will best be able to create world peace via a peaceful, non violent method? Wouldn't you also agree that the opposite method, which is absolute destruction of the whole world, and killing everyone on it is not the ideal way of creating peace in the world?

President Trump, Armageddon, Doomsday Cults, End Of The World Belief Systems; Apocalypse Among Christian, Judaism, Hindu, Islam, Buddhist, Zoroastrian, UFO, Y2K, Psychics, Numerology Followers, Planet X, Niburu, Chicken Little, Boy Who Cried Wolf

Which way do you believe it will happen? 

Which way are you supporting through your beliefs, words, actions, prayers and thoughts?

THE THREE EVILS THAT ARE DESTROYING THE WORLD AND LEADING TO GLOBAL SUICIDE VIA MULTIPLE NEGATIVE TIPPING POINTS


Words, actions, beliefs and prayers are very powerful things, so use them wisely for creation of a peaceful life, not the utter destruction of all life..

Dr Martin Luther King Jr. Speech About The Three Evils of White American Society; Racism, Militarism And Capitalism - Scientific Power Has Outrun Our Spiritual Power. We Have Guided Missiles And Misguided Men
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2016/01/dr-martin-luther-king-on-three-evils-of.html

Matrix Education And Justice Project; Drugs, Medicine, GMO's, Super Bugs, Cloning, Flouride, Vaccines, Education, Chemicals, Factory Farms
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/natural-health-drugs-medicine.html

DOOMSDAY PROPHETS KEEP PREDICTING ARMAGEDDON, AND CLAIM THAT ONLY A FEW LOYAL FOLLOWERS WILL LIVE THROUGH IT, THEY MAKE NO ATTEMPTS TO PREVENT GLOBAL NUCLEAR WAR; SOME OF THEM EVEN ENCOURAGE IT IN ORDER TO HURRY UP THEIR PREDICTION OF DOOM

Some people believe that the way to peace is via war, and that a nuclear war can be 'won'.

In his speech “Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence,” exactly 50 years ago, Martin Luther King said: “There is nothing, except a tragic death wish, to prevent us from reordering our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence over the pursuit of war.
Roots Action


Doomsday Christian Cult Says End Of World Is Near
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RsGK1CA34Y 3 Min.

This is just one example of many religions that make specific predictions about nuclear war coming and then only a few loyal followers will be rewarded with Heaven. The problem with this is that MANY religions and sects all make this same claim, so which one will God choose?

Pat Robertson Predictions Of Armageddon
VIDEO: http://youtu.be/KJf5s5PXK4M

Credit/source; Thinking People

Many of these believers are 'literalists', who follow all of the laws in the Old Testament or the equivalent in other religions. Read about what is supposed to happen to a religious leader if he makes a specific date and time prediction for ANYTHING, and then it does not come true.. You may be shocked... 

Possible Grounds For Execution In The Old Testament... How Many Death Penalties Are There?
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/07/grounds-for-execution-in-old-testament.html

It may also be helpful to read the following article about how to recognize a sociopath or psychopath.. How many of the following 10 red flags does the leader you know about have? 

How To Spot A Sociopath Or Psychopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job; via A Green Road
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/12/how-to-spot-sociopath-10-red-flags-that.html


SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT NUCLEAR PLANTS AND WEAPONS ARE NEEDED IN THE FUTURE; ARE NUCLEAR PLANTS AND WEAPONS REALLY 'SAFE'?

Would you bungee jump under a safety regime like this? 


Having multiple nations and people who hate each other and own thousands of nuclear weapons is the equivalent of all of these people standing in a lake of gasoline, and all of them holding a LIT match, ready to drop it into the lake of gasoline. How safe can we make that? 

What are the odds of them living through this insanity? 

NONE.

Zero Nuclear Weapons Peace And Justice Project; First Strike Policy, Ban Nuclear Bombs, DU, Down Winders, Acute Radiation Sickness, Nuclear War, Dirty Bombs, Bomb Shelters
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/nuclear-bombs-and-nuclear-weapons.html

Zero Rads In Children And Adults Eco Justice Project - Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Radiation Exposure
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/low-dose-radiation-dangers-for-children.html

Zero Rads Extraction Eco Justice Project; Uranium Mining, Enrichment, Nuclear Fuel Chain, Open Air Testing, Fracking
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/uranium-mining-and-enrichment.html

Zero Internal Rads Eco Justice Project; Negative Effects Of Internal Radiation Exposure, Risk Models, Hormesis, Radiophobia, Radiation Monitoring Networks
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/effects-of-internal-low-level-nuclear.html

Making Invisible Heavy Metal Radioactive Poison Visible Eco Justice Project; Ionizing Heavy Metal Poisonous Radiation In Food/Water/Products, Geiger Counters, Dosimeters, Radiation Readings, Test Labs, Conversions, Global Detector Network
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/low-level-nuclear-radiation-in-food-and.html

Zero Harm To Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants Eco Justice Project; Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Heavy Metal Radioactive Poisons In Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/animals-and-low-level-radiation-effects.html

Zero Nuclear Power Plant Threat Eco Justice Project; Accidents, Recycling Nuclear Fuel, Movie Reviews, Next Generation Nuclear Plants, Terrorists
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/nuclear-accidents-around-world.html

Radiation Research, Education, Database Eco Justice Project; Individual Radioactive Elements/Isotopes, USA Radiation, Radiation Exposure Prevention, Reversal, Chelation
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/individual-radioactive-elementsisotopes.html

Eco Justice Art - Artists As Activists; Art, Aging, Poetry, Lyrics And Lawsuits Project; Lawsuits, Aging Nuclear Reactors, Recertification, Music, Lyrics, Poetry
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/nuclear-reactor-recertification.html

Zero Rad Waste Eco Justice Project; Long Term Storage Of Nuclear Waste, Decommissioning, Ocean Dumping, Incineration, Decontamination, Water Contamination, Dry Cask Storage
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/recycling-or-long-term-storage-of.html

IS IT POSSIBLE TO LIVE THROUGH A GLOBAL NUCLEAR WAR WITH THOUSANDS OF NUCLEAR MISSILES AND TENS OF THOUSANDS OF NUCLEAR BOMBS WORTH OF RADIATION INSIDE NUCLEAR FACILITIES OF ALL KINDS?

The combination of 800 nuclear plants plus their open to the air spent fuel pools, each containing the equivalent of 1,000 to 10,000 nuclear weapons worth of deadly life destroying radiation, plus thousands of nuclear bombs that would destroy and liberate all of the radiation inside of all of those nuclear plants, spells doom for all life on the planet, if a global nuclear war is every triggered. 

Every Nuclear Reactor Is A Military Industrial Complex Weaponized With 2,300 WMD Nuclear Bombs Worth Of Radiation, While Producing More Fuel To Build More WMD Nuclear Weapons; Should US Be More Afraid Of Shoe Bomb Or Cell Phone Terrorists?

Life cannot survive an estimated 10,0000 nuclear weapons multiplied by 800 nuclear plants and their spent fuel pools, not to mention the additional 1,000's of toxic nuclear waste dumps or storage facilities above ground and in buildings all around the world. Go deeper here.....

Inside The Doomsday Plane; Who Will Survive A (MAD) Global Nuclear War And The Nuclear Winter That Comes After It? Humanity Cannot Survive The Destruction of 800 Nuclear Plants, Spent Fuel Pool Contents

The longer nuclear plants and nuclear weapons exist on Earth, the odds grow of a nuclear war happening. Go deeper here....

20+ Nuclear Doom Close Calls; Why MAD Total Nuclear Global World War III Almost Happened 20 Times So Far, What Happens AFTER A Global Nuclear War? Global Zero Nuclear Weapons Project

Bottom line, even the billionaires building their billion dollar underground bunkers will not live through a global nuclear war, and they won't want to live in the world that comes after anyway, even if they can survive. 

Carl Sagan; Nuclear Winter - Consequence Of EVEN LOCAL Nuclear War (MAD) Means Extinction Of All Life On Earth, A World War Cannot Be Fought Any Longer
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2013/08/nuclear-winter-consequence-of-nuclear.html



US IS VIOLATING NUCLEAR NON PROLIFERATION ACT - EVEN NORTH KOREA VOTED YES IN FAVOR OR NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT NEGOTIATIONS, WHY DID US VOTE NO?


REPORT FROM THE UN: THE US, UK, FRANCE AND SOUTH KOREA ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY
APRIL 17, 2017 A GREEN ROAD PROJECT

Ambassador Haley disingenuously referred to the nuclear status of North Korea in an attempt to legitimize the bad-faith boycott, but the falsity of her position is exposed by the fact that North Korea, at that October 27, 2016 conference, had voted “Yes” in support of Resolution L.41:“Taking Forward Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations.” North Korea was among the 123 United Nations member states who voted to support the resolution to create a legally binding treaty to prohibit and eliminate nuclear weapons. This is the very same resolution opposed by the Obama Administration.

The United Nations is one of the most sacrosanct forums for establishing international legal mechanisms. The legitimacy of this conference to enact the prohibition against nuclear weapons was endorsed by the majority of UN member states, and the imperative need for this legal instrument was emphatically emphasized on September 26, 2016 by this same majority of UN member states.

Article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty states:

“Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date, and to nuclear disarmament, and on a treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.”

The categorical refusal by the US, the UK, France and the ROK to participate in this ongoing United Nations conference is an egregious act of bad faith, a gross violation of Article VI of the NPT, and a violation of the core purpose of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty itself.


Further, the US is in blatant violation of Article 1 of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which states:

“Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices.”

In flagrant violation of Article 1 of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the US is, with impunity, transferring its B61-12 nuclear bombs to the territories of five non-nuclear weapon states participating in NATO: Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and Turkey. NATO itself is thereby in violation of the NPT.


The Conference is currently discussing including a prohibition on financing the production of nuclear weapons. At this time, according to the Dutch organization PAX, at least 390 financial institutions are investors in the nuclear weapons industries. Many pension plans, unbeknownst to, and in violation of the wishes of many elderly and retired pension holders, are investors in the production of nuclear weapons, frequently against the interests and will of the holders of these pensions.
via Report from the UN: The US, UK, France and South Korea Are In Violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

IT IS MUCH EASIER TO COPY SOMEONE ELSE OR SOMETHING THAT ALREADY EXISTS, THAN TO CREATE IT ALL FROM SCRATCH, AND THAT GOES FOR WORLD PEACE AS WELL

Just about everyone agrees that humanity can reach agreements around weapons of mass destruction, to reduce the risk of using them. 

Many people have taken action already towards the goal of global peace, by working on banning weapons of mass destruction for example, with some success. Let's look at what the nations of the world have achieved already, on the way to reaching the goal of world peace. It is much easier to copy what has already been done, and just change the words, rather than start absolutely from scratch and with nothing at all on paper. Why not copy existing treaties banning weapons of mass destruction treaties that have succeeded and just change the words required to fit any others? 

Note that all of these treaties have been accomplished by the United Nations organization, which is a place that various nations can meet to discuss, debate and then agree on how to accomplish goals, such as limiting or destroying weapons of mass destruction. 

LIST OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION TREATIES

List of weapons of mass destruction treaties
Wikipedia; "A variety of treaties and agreements have been enacted to regulate the use, development and possession of various types of weapons of mass destruction.

Treaties may regulate weapons use under the customs of war (Hague Conventions, Geneva Protocol),

ban specific types of weapons (Chemical Weapons Convention, Biological Weapons Convention),

limit weapons research (Partial Test Ban Treaty, Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty),

limit allowable weapons stockpiles and delivery systems (START I, SORT)

regulate civilian use of weapon precursors (Chemical Weapons Convention, Biological Weapons Convention).

The history of weapons control has also included treaties to limit effective defense against weapons of mass destruction in order to preserve the deterrent doctrine of mutual assured destruction (Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty)

treaties to limit the spread of nuclear technologies geographically (African Nuclear Weapons Free Zone Treaty, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty).

General



Delivery systems


Biological weapons

Chemical weapons

Brussels Convention on the Law and Customs of War (not adopted but relevant language incorporated into Hague Convention)

Nuclear weapons
Non-proliferation


By region


Weapons limitation

SALT I (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks)
START I (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty)
START III (not completed)
New START (2010)

Cooperation
Quebec Agreement (with Canada)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_weapons_of_mass_destruction_treaties

UNITED STATES FREEDOM FROM WAR PLAN

Freedom From War

INTRODUCTION

The revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of nuclear war now confronting mankind, the United States has introduced at the Sixteenth General Assembly of the United Nations a Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.

This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the peace. It sets forth a series of comprehensive measures which can and should be taken in order to bring about a world in which there will be freedom from war and security for all states. It is based on three principles deemed essential to the achievement of practical progress in the disarmament field:

FIRST STEP IS DISARMAMENT


First, there must be immediate disarmament action:

A strenuous and uninterrupted effort must be made toward the goal of general and complete disarmament; at the same time, it is important that specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.

Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject to effective international controls:

The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process.

Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established:

There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of national armaments on the one hand and the building up of international peace-keeping machinery and institutions on the other. Nations are unlikely to shed their means of self-protection in the absence of alternative ways to safeguard their legitimate interests. This can only be achieved through the progressive strengthening of international institutions under the United Nations and by creating a United Nations Peace Force to enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.

--------
There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.

SUMMARY

DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES


The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.

In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:

DISBANDING OF ALL STANDING MILITARIZED FORCES, OTHER THAN LOCAL POLICE, NOT SUBJECT TO FEDERAL CONTROL


The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;

The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;

The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;
The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.

TASK OF NEGOTIATING STATES


The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved. To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form part of the total program.

GOVERNING PRINCIPLES

The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:

As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;

Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is completed, in stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded measures;

Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of time, with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon as all measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and verified and as soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the next stage have been made;
Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process; and

Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state.

DISARMAMENT STAGES

The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place in three stages and for the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions.

FIRST STAGE

The first stage contains measures which would significantly reduce the capabilities of nations to wage aggressive war. Implementation of this stage would mean that:

The nuclear threat would be reduced:

All states would have adhered to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons. 

The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons would be stopped and quantities of such materials from past production would be converted to non-weapons uses.

States owning nuclear weapons would not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and would not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture.

States not owning nuclear weapons would not manufacture them or attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states.

A Commission of Experts would be established to report on the feasibility and means for the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.

Strategic delivery vehicles would be reduced:

Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles of specified categories and weapons designed to counter such vehicles would be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps; their production would be discontinued or limited; their testing would be limited or halted.

BANNING AND ELIMINATION OF ALL CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL WEAPONS


Arms and armed forces would be reduced:

The armed forces of the United States and the Soviet Union would be limited to 2.1 million men each (with appropriate levels not exceeding that amount for other militarily significant states); levels of armaments would be correspondingly reduced and their production would be limited.

An Experts Commission would be established to examine and report on the feasibility and means of accomplishing verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of all chemical, biological and radiological weapons.

Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted:

The placing in orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction would be prohibited.

States would give advance notification of space vehicle and missile launchings.

U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened:

Measures would be taken to develop and strengthen United Nations arrangements for arbitration, for the development of international law, and for the establishment in Stage II of a permanent U.N. Peace Force.

An International Disarmament Organization would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program:

Its functions would be expanded progressively as disarmament proceeds.

It would certify to all states that agreed reductions have taken place and that retained forces and armaments do not exceed permitted levels.

It would determine the transition from one stage to the next.

States would be committed to other measures to reduce international tension and to protect against the chance of war by accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack:

States would be committed to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter and to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.

A U.N. peace observation group would be available to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.

States would be committed to give advance notice of major military movements which might cause alarm; observation posts would be established to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.

SECOND STAGE

The second stage contains a series of measures which would bring within sight a world in which there would be freedom from war. Implementation of all measures in the second stage would mean:

Further substantial reductions in the armed forces, armaments, and military establishments of states, including strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and countering weapons;

Further development of methods for the peaceful settlement of disputes under the United Nations;
Establishment of a permanent international peace force within the United Nations;

Depending on the findings of an Experts Commission, a halt in the production of chemical, bacteriological and radiological weapons and a reduction of existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses;

On the basis of the findings of an Experts Commission, a reduction of stocks of nuclear weapons;

The dismantling or the conversion to peaceful uses of certain military bases and facilities wherever located; and

The strengthening and enlargement of the International Disarmament Organization to enable it to verify the steps taken in Stage II and to determine the transition to Stage III.

THIRD STAGE

During the third stage of the program, the states of the world, building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final steps toward the goal of a world in which:

States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.

The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.

The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.

The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.

Appendix
DECLARATION ON DISARMAMENT
THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM
FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT
IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

The Nations of the world,

Conscious of the crisis in human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;

Determined to save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic aspirations;

Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control and where the resources of nations shall be devoted to man's material, cultural, and spiritual advance;

Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:

(a) The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force; 

(b) The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;

(c) The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations; 

(d) The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations. 

Call on the negotiating states:

(a) To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved; 

(b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date; 

(c) Also to seek --- without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program --- agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a part of that program. 

Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:

(a) Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safeguarded measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed period of time. 

(b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed levels at any stage. 

(c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not a party to an international agreement or treaty. 

(d) As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to facilitate the development of international cooperation in common tasks for the benefit of mankind.

(e) Transition from one stage of disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be necessary for the next stage have been instituted. 

Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:

STAGE I

A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:

(a) An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for the effective verification of the disarmament program.

(b) The IDO shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3) an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the functions of the Organization.

(c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition from one stage to the next. 

B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:

(a) Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.

(b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.

(c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.

(d) A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of their production.

C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:

(a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.

(b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.

(c) Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
(d) Any fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be developed in agreement with the IAEA.

(e) States owning nuclear weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information or materials necessary for their manufacture.

(f) A Nuclear Experts Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.

D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:

(a) Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished in each step by transfers to depots supervised by the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the vehicles that have been placed under supervision of the IDO shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.

(b) Production of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued or limited.

(c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.

E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:

(a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable c,f producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.

(b) States shall give advance notification to participating states and to the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the track of the vehicle.

F. To Reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack:

(a) States shall give advance notification to the participating states and to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.

(b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.

(c) There shall also be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.

(d) An international commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine and make recommendations on the possibility of further measures to reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure of communication.

G. To Keep the Peace:

(a) States shall reaffirm their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force--including nuclear, conventional, or CBR--contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.

(b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.

(c) States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and for the codification and progressive development of international law. 

(d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.

(e) A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre of observers who could be dispatched to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.

STAGE II

A. International Disarmament Organization:

The powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken in Stage II.

B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:

(a) Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.

(b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.

(c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.

(d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.

(e) Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons, the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.

C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:

Stocks of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the Nuclear Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall be transferred to peaceful purposes.

D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:

Further reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.

E. To Keep the Peace:

During Stage II, states shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the United Nations, to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and principles of the United Nations: 

(a) States shall agree upon strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the United Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.

(b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.

(c) States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement of disputes and differences.

STAGE III

By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N. should have reached a point where the states of the world can move forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.

The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:

(a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N Peace Force.

(b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning. 

(c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.

(d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1961 O 609147


The United States Program 
for General and Complete 
Disarmament in a Peaceful 
World

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

DEPARTMENT OF STATE PUBLICATION 7277
Disarmament Series 5
Released September 1961

Office of Public Services
BUREAU OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C. - Price 15 cents

MUSICIANS AS ACTIVISTS FOR WORLD PEACE


Sting sings a song for humanity, and how we need to get rid of nuclear weapons..
VIDEO:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuhuyiQbMU0 4 min.

SUMMARY

"In 1963, the same year as his “I Have a Dream” speech, Dr. King pointedly said: “We have guided missiles and misguided men.” Later -- speaking of “a world torn between the tensions of East and West” -- he warned that “we live each day on the verge of nuclear co-annihilation.”

Speaking at the National Cathedral in Washington four days before he was assassinated, King denounced war and said: “On some positions, cowardice asks the question, is it expedient? And then expedience comes along and asks the question, is it politic? Vanity asks the question, is it popular? Conscience asks the question, is it right?”
Source; Roots Action

5 Reasons Why Nuclear Energy Is A Dead End Technology, by Jeremy Rifkin - Advisor To Heads Of State Around The World

There is another element that is missing from the above discussion around global peace, and that is the evolution of consciousness. There is a constant birth happening globally, and part of that birth is happening via greater awareness plus consciousness. 

What Is Consciousness? The Theory Of Everything Inside An Evolving Consciousness; Introduction To Multiple Forms Of Consciousness - Materialistic, Altered States, Quantum, Void, Hero, Non Physical, Religious And Universal Oneness

There is also a dying that is happening globally. Various monopolies controlled by top down 1 percent billionaires are being exposed to the light because the things that they support, such as carbon, nuclear and chemical industries are destroying all life on the planet. Humanity must move away from these things, and prevent them from growing, or global suicide is the end result.

Peace And Justice, Human Rights Justice Project; War, Veterans, Drones, Human Rights, Justice, Prisons, War on Drugs, Violence Prevention, Death Penalty, Jury Rights, Gay/Women's Rights, Pro Choice
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/human-rightsjusticeprisons.html

Save Planet Earth 911 Eco-Justice Project; Global Emergencies And Planetary Threats
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/why-all-nuclear-plants-must-be-shut-down.html

Transformation, Growing Awareness, Consciousness, Justice Shift Through Stories Project; Ancient Stories, Success, Motivation, Activism, Spiritual, Interfaith, Consciousness, Near Death, Miracles, Healing, Auras, Reincarnation
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/spiritualinterfaithconsciousness.html

The Natural Green Medicine Health Justice Project; Natural Green Medicine, Health, Self Healing Experiential Modalities
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/a-green-road-projects.html

7 Generations Zero Harm Eco Justice Project; Environment, Carbon Footprint, Holistic Living, Zero Point, Renewable Energy, Energy Storage, Housing, Zero Nuclear, Zero Carbon, Zero Waste, Zero Chemicals
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/natural-health-drugs-medicine.html

Transformation, Experiential Learning And Growing Awareness Plus Consciousness Through Mysteries Project;
Exploring the Inner and Outer Mysteries Of Life And The Galaxy, Sustainable Education System
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/p/mystery.html


WHAT YOU CAN DO; GET INVOLVED, SPEAK UP, TAKE ACTION


Martin Luther King (MLK) Speech; Silence Is Betrayal And Evil Men Triumph Because Good People Do Nothing - Get Involved, Make A Difference, Get Active, And Make A Positive Difference In The Way You Are Called


ENDORSE, LEARN, TRANSFORM, DONATE, SHARE, SUPPORT, SPONSOR, CONNECT, COMMENT, AND/OR COLLABORATE


Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to Translate; 60 languages - German, French, Russian, Spanish
AGRP Facebook Daily News Page - Linkedin
Smartphone App - RSS Feed - Index
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Green Road Project; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? Support AGRP and share this page; Twitter, Facebook, Email, Tumbler, Reddit, Stumbleupon, Google+, Pinterest, Instagram, Wordpress and on Buffer



COPYRIGHT
"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:www.lawcornel.edu/uscode. Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.

End

Global World Peace Plan; Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 - Living Consciously And With Clear Intent, In A World Free Of War Takes Thought, Words And Then Action; Either We Create Global Peace, Or We Are Destroying All Life On The Planet Via WWIII
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2017/04/global-world-peace-plan-phase-1-phase-2.html

Thank you for including the article link when publishing AGR article(s) elsewhere. 

Website and contact page


A Green Road Project - Science Of Sustainable Health Open Source Commons Knowledge Database
- Click in search box in upper right corner and type in search term to find any related article(s)

Reactions:
Share this post: