Plutonium; Several Compounds Of This Toxic, Radioactive Heavy Metal Poison Are Pyrophoric, Burns When Exposed To Air - Was A Plutonium Micro Nuclear Bomb Used In Allepo And Bali In 2002? Lightest Nuclear Bomb Is A W54 Davy Crockett 120 MM Recoilless Rifle-Launched Nuclear Warhead

CHERNOBYL SUFFERED TWO EXPLOSIONS AND ONE OF THEM WAS A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION; SCATTERED URANIUM AND PLUTONIUM ALL OVER THE GLOBE 

Nuclear accidents that scatter super deadly, super poisonous plutonium are fairly regular, common and frequent. Everyone on the planet is getting a free sample of deadly man made heavy metal poisons such as plutonium.

Jan HemmerThe Rainbow Warriors 1986. One second. 190 tons uranium dioxide. 450 Kg Plutonium.
Two Explosions. One was nuclear.


Source; credit

PLUTONIUM FALLOUT FROM FUKUSHIMA WAS NEARLY 70,000 TIMES THAT OF THE JAPAN ATOMIC BOMBING


Rob Soltysik Experts: Plutonium 241 from Fukushima nearly 70,000 times the fallout of the Japan atomic bomb.


Pu239, Pu240, looking at the overall total of pu241, 212 times. pu241 is projecting.


What Really Happened At #3 Fukushima Reactor And Spent Fuel Pool #3? Multiple Nuclear Experts Interviewed; 3 Different Explosions, And Huge Black, Purple Mushroom Nuclear Explosion Cloud, Which Cannot Possibly Be A Hydrogen Explosion
https://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2016/04/what-really-happened-at-3-fukushima.html

Multiple Fukushima Spent Fuel Pools Burned And Vaporized, Plutonium MOX Fuel Vaporized And Traveled All Around The World On Jet Stream, Arnie Gunderson Proves That Nuclear Plant Fuel Rods Catch On Fire, Emit Nuclear 'Smoke', And Burn Just Like Wood In A Fireplace

PLUTONIUM ACCIDENTS AND EMISSIONS ARE CONSTANT AND NEVER ENDING IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY, ANYWHERE PLUTONIUM IS HANDLED, PROCESSED OR SPILLED


Rob Soltysik Plutonium scattered on the floor at the Japanese accident? Insanely dangerous.

Black Lumps On The Floor-Possibility Of Plutonium Splashing
In the exposure accident of the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Oarai Research and Development Center (Oarai Town, Ibaraki Prefecture), JAEA released a photograph showing several black lumps on the floor of Room 108 where the accident occurred on the 9th. It is said that plutonium and uranium may have been scattered.

PLUTONIUM IN MOIST AIR FORMS OXIDES AND HYDRIDES THAT FLAKE OFF AS A POWDER, AND THAT POWDER CAN AND DOES SPONTANEOUSLY IGNITE

How dangerous is plutonium?

Wikipedia; "Plutonium is a transuranic radioactive chemical element with the symbol Pu and atomic number 94. It is an actinide metal of silvery-gray appearance that tarnishes when exposed to air, and forms a dull coating when oxidized. The element normally exhibits six allotropes and four oxidation states. It reacts with carbon, halogens, nitrogen, silicon and hydrogen

When exposed to moist air, it forms oxides and hydrides that expand the sample up to 70% in volume, which in turn flake off as a powder that can spontaneously ignite. It is radioactive and can accumulate in the bones. These properties make the handling of plutonium dangerous.....

At 135 °C plutonium will ignite in air and will explode if placed in carbon tetrachloride.[32] (Note; mixed wastes including plutonium plus toxic chemicals like this one were accepted at WIPP. High level wastes at WIPP are both hot temperature wise and emit radiation in the Billions of bequerels per Kg.)

Plutonium is a reactive metal. In moist air or moist argon, the metal oxidizes rapidly, producing a mixture of oxides and hydrides.[5] If the metal is exposed long enough to a limited amount of water vapor, a powdery surface coating of PuO2 is formed.[5] Also formed is plutonium hydride but an excess of water vapor forms only PuO2.[31]

With this coating, the metal is pyrophoric, meaning it can ignite spontaneously, so plutonium metal is usually handled in an inert, dry atmosphere of nitrogen or argon. Oxygen retards the effects of moisture and acts as a passivating agent.[5]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium

More on this subject is available at;

Surface and Corrosion Chemistry of PLUTONIUM
http://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/pubs/00818031.pdf

DEPT OF ENERGY SAYS SEVERAL COMPOUNDS OF PLUTONIUM ARE PYROPHORIC AND HAVE CAUSED SERIOUS FIRES AT NUCLEAR FUEL PROCESSING FACILITIES


Wikipedia; "Plutonium: several compounds are pyrophoric, and it causes some of the most serious fires occurring in United States Department of Energy facilities.[8]

Plutonium's pyrophoricity can cause it to look like a glowing ember under certain conditions. A pyrophoric substance (from Greek πυροφόρος, pyrophoros, "fire-bearing") is a substance that ignites spontaneously in air at or below 54.55 °C (130.19 °F)".[1] Examples are iron sulfide and many reactive metals including uranium, when powdered or thinly sliced. Pyrophoric materials are often water-reactive as well and will ignite when they contact water or humid air. 

Wikipedia; Allotropes of plutonium occurs in a variety of allotropes of plutonium, even at ambient pressure. These allotropes differ widely in crystal structure and density; the α and δ allotropes differ in density by more than 25% at constant pressure.

Plutonium normally has six allotropes and forms a seventh (zeta, ζ) under high temperature and a limited pressure range.[1] These allotropes have very similar energy levels but significantly varying densities and crystal structures. This makes plutonium very sensitive to changes in temperature, pressure, or chemistry, and allows for dramatic volume changes following phase transitions.[2] Unlike most materials, plutonium increases in density when it melts, by 2.5%, but the liquid metal exhibits a linear decrease in density with temperature.[3] Densities of the different allotropes vary from 16.00 g/cm3 to 19.86 g/cm3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_plutonium

SPENT FUEL POOLS AT ALL NUCLEAR PLANTS CAN AND DO CATCH FIRE IF EXPOSED TO AIR


Gundersen: Pyrophoric fire if fuel rods in Unit 4 pool are not cooled — Potential contamination of entire northern hemisphere (VIDEO) The fuel is still hot enough where it can begin to burn… cesium and plutonium and all that…It would volatilize as the fuel burns, it creates a pyrophoric fire which is a fire that water cannot put out.  Likely resulting in an evacuation of Tokyo at the least, and potentially contamination of the entire northern hemisphere. 
http://enenews.com/gundersen-pyrophoric-fire-fuel-rods-unit-4-pool-cooled-potential-contamination-entire-northern-hemisphere-video 

NUCLEAR WASTE CAN AND DOES CATCH ON FIRE OR EXPLODE AT LONG TERM STORAGE FACILITIES


What happened at the WIPP facility, which recently released plutonium, americium and other radioactive gases in unknown amounts?

What caused the release of plutonium from both Fukushima and now WIPP? Could the release have had something to do with plutonium being pyrophoric and igniting, and/or exploding due to being combined with chemicals in some form or fashion? 

WAS A PLUTONIUM MICRO NUKE USED IN BALI BOMB BLAST IN 2002 AS SOME MEDIA REPORTED?

There are several stories and videos circulating on the Internet about a micro nuclear bomb being used in Aleppo and in Bali. Here is the one side of the story, claiming that micro nukes were behind these bomb blasts.

GOMSeptember 1, 2016 WAS A "MICRO-NUKE" WARHEAD USED IN BALI BLAST?

Once you closely examine the statistics of the Bali bomb blast, you realize…a nuclear warhead

DETAILS THAT POINT DIRECTLY TO A NUCLEAR DEVICE.
http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1715.cfm

*Several journalist's accounts..Graphic text.

Micro Nuclear 'Bombs'

The following high-speed videos shows the detonation of a slight variation of ration and isotopes of uranium and plutonium. This mixture is a newly invented hyper-critical fission material, allowing the detonation of only minuscule amounts of material in the range of micro- and nanograms. Therefore, these small amounts of material can be detonated in an ordinary laboratory environment without the fear of harmful amounts of radiation, heat or light being produced.
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/VVvURlk6Vjc 2 minutes ]


Dr. Goodheart Calling this BS....Maybe it was magnesium… or thermite, but it was definitely NOT nuclear.

Hippie DogSeptember 1, 2016 I agree with Dr. G on this one. That ain't nuclear…Made too many cool mag or acetylene booms back in the day cutting steel and playin around with these things I guess! Just don't think so…

GOM September 2, 2016 Time passed and by the late fifties these fission weapons were being “micronized”. It was not long before the scientists realized that in creating the tiny “core weapon” for the hydrogen bomb, they had also created a relatively lightweight micro nuclear weapon that could be carried by a single soldier for various uses. As you will read later in this report, no ordinary Geiger counter from any nation could detect radiation from the weapon. Why dozens of full-size human victims had vanished completely without trace. Only a critical nuclear weapon has the heat needed for instant cremation, combined with the incredibly fast shock wave needed to completely remove the resulting cremated particles from the local area. If this doesn't change your mind, nothing will.
http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/01/31/bali-micro-nuke-lack-radiation-confuses-experts-bomb-flashed-exploded-micro-nuke-ge

Dr. Goodheart September 2, 2016 Still calling the micro nuke stuff fake due to not having enough critical mass inside of a 4 inch sewer pipe, which is what the articles above claim is where the micro nuclear weapon was placed. There are many problems with this theory.. 

Here is the official account and bomb making materials itemized for the Bali bombing attack. If a person researches on the net, certainly the items combined in a car bomb could generate this kind of blast.. Certainly people can be vaporized/burned in a fuel air bomb explosion that generates temperatures above 3,000 degree Fahrenheit and the fire that comes after that, burning everything and everyone just like a crematorium would function. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Bali_bombings

A fuel-air explosive can have the effect of a tactical nuclear weapon without residual radiation.2

The blast wave destroys reinforced buildings and equipment and kills and injures people. The antipersonnel effect of the blast wave is more severe in foxholes and tunnels, and in enclosed spaces, such as bunkers and caves.
According to a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency study,[15] "the effect of an FAE explosion within confined spaces is immense. Those near the ignition point are obliterated.

Another claim is made that a car bomb cannot create a crater and that it takes a nuclear device to create a crater. Well, the evidence suggests otherwise. In the Oklahoma City bombing, a huge crater was generated by the truck bomb there. 

One third of the building was destroyed by the explosion,[64] which created a 30-foot-wide (9.1 m), 8-foot-deep (2.4 m) crater on NW 5th Street next to the building.[65]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing

Another problem is that there was no radiation after these supposed micro nuke explosions. Even with a radiation free neutron bomb, you get SOME radiation and it is detectable after the explosion. A normal nuclear weapon, even a plutonium atomic bomb will generate radiation and the neutron radiation will embed itself in a blast pattern thus creating radioactive materials, which can be measured. There is no way to create an atomic bomb, set it off, and then leave absolutely ZERO radiation.

Even if all of the radiation is alpha radiation, one can easily detect this with a simple pancake style detector, which anyone can buy. For proof of this, measure the radiation on a simple Americium containing smoke detector. Despite it emitting only alpha radiation, that radiation can be measured and detected by a simple radiation detector.

Ionizing Smoke Detectors Containing Radioactive Americium 241 Are Deadly Dangerous!
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/02/how-dangerous-are-smoke-detectors.html

There are no pictures or videos of mushroom cloud nor are there any pixelations in any photos of the actual explosion. If it was a DU type of weapon, there are no pictures of sparklers or pixelations on a digital camera, which is a specific signature of an atomic bomb, or DU weapon. Again there is the issue of missing radiation.

The smallest critical mass for plutonium and with a goal of creating a mini nuclear bomb is way beyond what can fit inside of a 4 inch sewer pipe, especially when one adds the ignitor, reflector, gun, electronics, fuse, etc.


THE SMALLEST NUCLEAR WEAPON FITS IN A FOOTLOCKER OR A LARGE SUITCASE, NOT A SMALL 4 INCH SEWER PIPE


Of all the common nuclear fuels, Pu-239 has the smallest critical mass. A spherical untamped critical mass is about 11 kg (24.2 lbs),[2] 10.2 cm (4") in diameter. Using appropriate triggers, neutron reflectors, implosion geometry and tampers, this critical mass can be reduced by more than twofold. This optimization usually requires a large nuclear development organization supported by a sovereign nation.

The lightest nuclear warhead ever acknowledged to have been manufactured by the U.S. is the W54, which was used in both the Davy Crockett 120 mm recoilless rifle-launched warhead and the backpack-carried version called the Mk-54 SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munition). The bare warhead package was an 11 in by 16 in (28 cm by 41 cm) cylinder that weighed 51 lbs (23 kg). It was, however, small enough to fit in a footlocker-sized container.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suitcase_nuclear_device


DAVY CROCKETT WEAPON SYSTEM IS THE SMALLEST NUCLEAR DEVICE THAT IS PORTABLE


Wikipedia; "The M-28 or M-29 Davy Crockett Weapon System was the tactical nuclear recoilless gun (smoothbore) for firing the M-388 nuclear projectile that was deployed by the United States during the Cold War. It was one of the smallest nuclear weapon systems ever built, with a yield between 10 and 20 tons TNT equivalent (40–80 gigajoules). It is named after American folk hero, soldier, and congressman Davy Crockett.

Davy Crockett was a recoilless gun on a tripod for firing the M-388 atomic round

Development[
US officials view a W54 nuclear warhead, as used on the Davy Crockett. The unusually small size of the warhead is apparent.

The Davy Crockett recoilless spigot gun was developed in the late 1950s for use against Soviet and North Korean armor and troops in case war broke out in Europe or the Korean peninsula. Davy Crockett Sections were assigned to United States Army Europe and Eighth United States Army armor and mechanized and non-mechanized infantry battalions. 

During alerts to the Inner German border in the Fulda Gap the Davy Crocketts accompanied their battalions. All V Corps (including 3rd Armored Division) combat maneuver battalions had preassigned positions in the Fulda Gap. These were known as GDP (General Defense Plan) positions. The Davy Crockett sections were included in these defensive deployment plans. In addition to the Davy Crocketts (e.g., assigned to the 3rd Armored Division), V Corps had nuclear artillery rounds and Atomic Demolition Mines, and these were also targeted on the Fulda Gap. 

On the Korean peninsula, units assigned the Davy Crockett weapons primarily planned to use the passes that funneled armor as killing grounds, creating temporarily deadly radioactive zones roadblocked by destroyed tanks and other vehicles.

The M-388 round used a version of the Mk-54 warhead, a very small sub-kiloton fission device. The Mk-54 weighed about 51 lb (23 kg), with a yield equivalent to somewhere between 10 and 20 tons of TNT—close to the minimum practical size for a fission warhead,[1] and comparable in yield to the largest conventional bombs developed at the time.[2] 

The only selectable feature with either version of the Davy Crockett (M28 & M29) was the height-of-burst dial on the warhead. Post-Davy Crockett versions of the W54 nuclear device apparently had a selectable yield feature (see below for Hi/Lo Switch and Launching Piston references). 

The complete round weighed 76 lb (34.5 kg). It was 31 in. (78.7 cm) long with a diameter of 11 in. (28 cm) at its widest point; a subcaliber piston at the back of the shell was inserted into the launcher's barrel for firing.[3] 

The "piston" was considered a spigot prior to the discharge of the propellant cartridge in the recoilless gun chamber of the Davy Crockett. The M-388 atomic projectile was mounted on the barrel-inserted spigot via bayonet slots. Once the propellant was discharged the spigot became the launching piston for the M-388 atomic projectile. The nuclear yield is hinted at in FM 9-11: Operation and Employment of the Davy Crockett Battlefield Missile, XM-28/29 (June 1963).

The M-388 could be launched from either of two launchers known as the Davy Crockett Weapon System(s): the 4.7-inch (120 mm) M28, with a range of about 1.25 mi (2 km), or the 6.1-in (155 mm) M29, with a range of 2.5 mi (4 km). Both weapons used the same projectile, and were either mounted on a tripod launcher transported by an armored personnel carrier, or they were carried by a Jeep (M-38 & later M-151). 

The Jeep was equipped with an attached launcher for the M28 or the M29, as required, whereas the Davy Crockett carried by an armored personnel carrier was set up in the field on a tripod away from the carrier. The Davy Crocketts were operated by a three-man crew.[4] In the 3rd Armored Division in Germany in the 1960s many Davy Crockett Sections (all of which were in the Heavy Mortar Platoons, in Headquarters Companies of Infantry or Armor Maneuver Battalions) received what became a mix of M28 & M29 launchers [e.g., one of each per D/C section]. Eventually, the M28s were replaced by M29s, so that both the armored personnel carriers and the Jeeps carried the M29.
A Davy Crockett casing preserved in the United States Army Ordnance Museum

Both recoilless guns proved to have poor accuracy in testing, so the shell's greatest effect would have been its extreme radiation hazard. The M-388 would produce an almost instantly lethal radiation dosage (in excess of 10,000 rem, 100 Sv) within 500 feet (150 m), and a probably fatal dose (around 600 rem, 6 Sv) within a quarter mile (400 m).[5] The weapon did not have an abort function; if fired, the warhead would explode.[6]

The warhead was tested on July 7, 1962 in the Little Feller II weapons effects test shot, and again in an actual firing of the Davy Crockett from a distance of 1.7 miles (2.72 km) in the Little Feller I test shot on July 17. This was the last atmospheric test detonation at the Nevada Test Site.

Production of the Davy Crockett began following the 15 August 1958 (at) Picatinny Arsenal approval of the design, with a total of 2,100 being made. 

The weapon was tested between 1962 and 1968 at the Pohakuloa Training Area on Hawaiʻi island, with 714 M101 spotter rounds (not live warheads) that contained depleted uranium.[7][8] The weapon was deployed with US Army forces from 1961 to 1971. It was removed from US Army Europe (in West Germany) in August 1967.[9]

Versions of the W54 warhead were also used in the Special Atomic Demolition Munition project and the AIM-26A Falcon.Mk-54 (Davy Crockett): 10 or 20 ton yield, Davy Crockett Gun warhead Mk-54 (SADM): variable yield 10 ton to 1 kiloton, Special Atomic Demolition Munition deviceW-54: 250 ton yield, warhead for AIM-26 Falcon air-to-air missile

The 55th and 56th Infantry Platoons, attached to the Division Artillery of the US 82nd Airborne Division, were the last units equipped with the M-29 Davy Crockett weapons system. These two units were parachute deployed and, with a ½ ton truck per section (three per platoon), were fully air droppable. The units were deactivated in mid-1968.

Proposed German military use

One of the most fervent supporters of the Davy Crockett was West Germany's defense minister Franz Josef Strauss, in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Strauss promoted the idea of equipping German brigades with the nuclear weapon, to be supplied by the US, arguing that this would allow German troops to become a much more effective factor in NATO's defense of Germany against a potential Soviet invasion. 

He argued that a single Davy Crockett could replace 40–50 salvos of a whole divisional artillery park – allowing the funds and troops normally needed for this artillery to be invested into further troops, or not having to be spent at all. US NATO commanders strongly opposed Strauss's ideas, as they would have made the use of tactical nuclear weapons almost mandatory in case of war, further reducing the ability of NATO to defend itself without resorting to atomic weapons.[10]

Museum examples

The following museums have a Davy Crockett casing in their collection:

National Atomic Museum, adjacent to Kirtland AFB, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Watervliet Arsenal Museum, Watervliet, New York
Atomic Testing Museum, Las Vegas, Nevada
Don F. Pratt Museum, Fort Campbell, Clarksville, Tennessee

This is about as small as a micro nuclear bomb gets, and that will not fit into a 4 inch sewer pipe.

Also, if somehow, a person could fit a nuke into a sewer pipe, it would completely block it, and cause a backup.. Combining water and plutonium is also not a good idea, as plutonium may catch on fire spontaneously, and that is not a good thing. So the weapon would have to be placed and blown, all in a matter of seconds or minutes. Someone would notice workmen messing with a sewer pipe right before any nuclear explosion.

How would the nuke go around bends and corners that are the rule with sewer pipes, in order to be placed right in front of the Bali nightclub?

The whole thing is just a little too far out there and the pieces of a nuclear mini nuclear weapon theory just do not fit together.

DID A NUCLEAR DEVICE GET SET OFF IN YEMEN? 

Now the nuclear device explosion in Yemen; that one is REAL, due to EVIDENCE AND DATA, which cannot be explained away. But that explosion was not a miniature one; it was MASSIVE....

Former IAEA Inspector And Nuclear Physicist Says Neutron/Nuclear Bomb Went Off In Yemen, Comparison To Huge Explosion, Digital Camera Pixelations Prove This Was A Nuclear Device

There is a certain critical mass that you just cannot get below, in order to get an atomic explosion. And to light plutonium off, you need a neutron reflector and/or a 'gun' and that all adds weight, etc.

If you combine water and plutonium powder, you will get spontaneous combustion, but not a nuclear explosion.

For a full discussion of what it takes to get an atomic bomb to explode, and not create a radioactive fire or a fizzle, see
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=39669.0

AGR is still calling the micro nuclear video and Bali micro nuke story a bogus theory, with no basis in scientific fact, evidence or real world data.

WHAT YOU CAN DO

Calculate your carbon footprint. What you cannot measure, you cannot improve or change. Once you know what your carbon footprint is, reduce it and set a goal of getting it to ZERO. 

Practice regenerating, healing and transforming..


Carbon Footprint; How To Calculate It For Home, Farm, Business; Zero Carbon, Zero Nuclear Future Required, How To Turn 6 Pounds Of Gasoline Into 20 Pounds Of CO2; How And Why Nuclear Energy Is Not The Answer

Once you know what your carbon footprint is, reduce it and set a goal of getting it to ZERO. 

Calculate Your Carbon FOOD Based Footprint; Eating Animal Products Like Beef Creates Huge Carbon Footprint And Largest Source Of Global Warming Carbon Pollution Globally; What Is Single Best Thing To Do In Order To Achieve A Zero Carbon Lifestyle?

Lease or purchase an electric car...or at the very least a plug in hybrid, and then plug it in every night.

Almost All Electric Cars Are Being Leased, Not Sold, And Leases Are Available For Less Than $100 Per Month, Recharge Cost Per Month Averages $34, Plus List Of Best Current Electric Car Lease Deals

S Curve And Electric Cars; 500 Million Electric Vehicles (EV's) Forecast To Be On The Road By 2040 (Bloomberg) Plus 7 Powerful Positive Reasons Why Any Ordinary Common Sense Person Should Buy An EV Today

Work on switching your energy sources for home, vehicles and workplace to renewable energy. 

5 Ways To Get Free Power For Your Electric Vehicle; Using Solar, Wind, Geothermal Energy To Power Electric Car And Home 100 Percent; Be Part Of The Zero Carbon, Zero Nuclear Future Revolution Which Is Here Now

Learn about what you can do to make a difference, and end up with a zero carbon, zero nuclear energy footprint lifestyle.

WHAT YOU CAN DO; RESEARCH THE DARK SIDE OF THE NUCLEAR MONOPOLY

A Green Road Journal has the largest, most organized, deepest set of articles, videos and pictures exposing the dark side of the nuclear monopoly in the world.

Zero Nuclear Weapons Peace And Justice Project; First Strike Policy, Ban Nuclear Bombs, DU, Down Winders, Acute Radiation Sickness, Nuclear War, Dirty Bombs, Bomb Shelters

Zero Rads In Children And Adults Eco Justice Project - Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Radiation Exposure

Zero Rads Extraction Eco Justice Project; Uranium Mining, Enrichment, Nuclear Fuel Chain, Open Air Testing, Fracking

Zero Internal Rads Eco Justice Project; Negative Effects Of Internal Radiation Exposure, Risk Models, Hormesis, Radiophobia, Radiation Monitoring Networks

Making Invisible Heavy Metal Radioactive Poison Visible Eco Justice Project; Ionizing Heavy Metal Poisonous Radiation In Food/Water/Products, Geiger Counters, Dosimeters, Radiation Readings, Test Labs, Conversions, Global Detector Network

Zero Harm To Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants Eco Justice Project; Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Heavy Metal Radioactive Poisons In Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants

Zero Nuclear Power Plant Threat Eco Justice Project; Accidents, Recycling Nuclear Fuel, Movie Reviews, Next Generation Nuclear Plants, Terrorists

Radiation Research, Education, Database Eco Justice Project; Individual Radioactive Elements/Isotopes, USA Radiation, Radiation Exposure Prevention, Reversal, Chelation

Eco Justice Art - Artists As Activists; Art, Aging, Poetry, Lyrics And Lawsuits Project; Lawsuits, Aging Nuclear Reactors, Recertification, Music, Lyrics, Poetry

Zero Rad Waste Eco Justice Project; Long Term Storage Of Nuclear Waste, Decommissioning, Ocean Dumping, Incineration, Decontamination, Water Contamination, Dry Cask Storage

MUSIC, ART AND POETRY ACTIVISM


Devo - Whip It (Official Music Video) | Warner Vault

Billionaires must 'whip' the people's minds
Into thoughts that are acceptable
Into behaviors that benefit them
Into PROFIT at any cost
Crack that whip
Dr Goodheart

WHAT YOU CAN DO; DONATE TO AGR

Donate To A Green Road Project; Help Dr. Goodheart Teach How To Make A Positive Difference For Seven Future Generations Of Children, Animals, Plants And The Planet

WHAT YOU CAN DO; TRANSLATE ANY ARTICLE ON AGR

Click to Translate; 60 languages - German, French, Russian, Spanish

WHAT YOU CAN DO; JOIN THE NETWORK OF OTHER ACTIVISTS ON AGR SOCIAL MEDIA

Join The Network Of Other Online Social Media Activists At A Green Road Project - Work With Dr Goodheart - Follow A Green Road Daily News, A Green Road Journal, And Link To AGR On Other Social Media

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, full text at

NAVIGATE AGR WEB SITES

Website and contact page


End

Plutonium; Several Compounds Of This Toxic, Radioactive Heavy Metal Poison Are Pyrophoric, Burns When Exposed To Air - Was A Plutonium Micro Nuclear Bomb Used In Allepo And Bali In 2002? Lightest Nuclear Bomb Is A W54 Davy Crockett 120 MM Recoilless Rifle-Launched Nuclear Warhead


    Loading