Index, Table Of Contents, About Page

Trump's Clean Coal Hormesis Theory Debunked, Promoting Disastrous Toxic Coal Energy Policy; Pro Clean Nuclear Hormesis Theory Propaganda and Lie Exposed And Debunked, Coal Plants Are The Largest Source Of Toxic/Poison Emissions In Average Town - 9 Coal Trump Bankruptcies

Trump's Clean Coal Hormesis Theory Debunked, Promoting Disastrous Toxic Coal Energy Policy; Pro Clean Nuclear Hormesis Theory Propaganda and Lie Exposed And Debunked, Coal Plants Are The Largest Source Of Toxic/Poison Emissions In Average Town - 9 Coal Trump Bankruptcies


NINE COAL COMPANIES HAVE DECLARED BANKRUPTCY AFTER TRUMP PROMISED TO HELP THEM AND PROMOTED CLEAN COAL AS THE FUTURE OF ENERGY POLICY IN THE USA

Trump promoting them did not help.

Trump deregulating them did not help.

Trump promising to help them did not help.

Trump calling coal a 'clean energy fuel' did not make any difference.

Ohio-Based Coal Giant Murray Energy Declares Bankruptcy
QUOTE NOVEMBER 2, 2019 A GREEN ROAD DAILY NEWS LEAVE A COMMENT
Murray Energy is the ninth coal producer to seek bankruptcy during the Trump administration. Murray’s declaration follows the chaotic and high-profile bankruptcy of West Virginia-based Blackjewel LLC and Kentucky-based metallurgical coal mining company Blackhawk Mining.

While bankruptcies are not new for the U.S. coal industry, the recent spate of restructuring may point to a fundamental shift for the industry, according to Seth Feaster, energy data analyst for the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, a think tank that supports energy transition.

“The competitive environment that coal is facing is only looking to become more competitive, and so it’s not really a temporary blip for them,” Feaster said. “There are companies that are saying, ‘well, we’re going to survive this downturn and come out stronger on the other side,’ but I’m not sure where the other side is for the coal industry at this point.”
via ohiovalleyresource Ohio-Based Coal Giant Murray Energy Declares Bankruptcy

Trump promised to help them thrive, and instead they went bankrupt.

So much for Trump promises.

TRUMP IS FORCING THE US BACKWARDS INTO A DIRTY, TOXIC, HEALTH DESTROYING FOSSIL FUEL POWERED MONOPOLY SYSTEM


Instead of taking the US forward into a clean, zero carbon, zero nuclear innovative and sustainable renewable energy future, President Trump is taking the country by FORCE back into environment destroying, health corrupting coal, due to the corrupting, anti democratic influence of the 1 percent and the monopolistic huge fossil fuel and nuclear corporations, who are only in it for the profit and huge corporate welfare plus entitlement payments.. Let's dive deeper.

Here is more evidence that there is no such thing as 'clean coal'. 

War On Our Future There are over 1,400 pits filled with toxic coal ash in the United States. And they're starting to leak into the water supply... #YEARSproject with Earthjustice



How is Trump making things much worse, even in coal country?

War On Our Future Appalachia is suffering from the most severe black lung epidemic in 25 years, and the Trump Administration is only making it worse. #YEARSproject
VIDEOhttps://www.facebook.com/yearswaronourfuture/videos/1821561074595892/

COAL MINING JOBS HAVE BEEN DROPPING SINCE 1923; IS THAT WHAT TRUMP WANTS TO BRING BACK? A 1923 LIFESTYLE? 

Do we really want to go back to 1923, when horse buggies and coal fired stoves were all the rage? Trump seems to want to drag the whole country back to 1923, and switch off all solar, wind. water, geothermal and other CLEAN energy plants.

In the UK, back in the coal days, the whole city was covered in black coal ash soot, and laundry got black if it was hung outside. The whole city was covered in a dark toxic coal soot pollution haze that one could not see through. Is this what America wants to move backwards into?


Ask the people around you, if they want to go back to 1923?

This was a time when women could not vote, when coal was carried in buckets from the basement to the stove upstairs, and dirty coal dust plus fumes and pollution caused a dark haze over entire cities and towns?

Coal: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/aw6RsUhw1Q8  24 min

TRUMP LIED ABOUT CHINA AND INDIA NOT DOING ANYTHING; THEY ARE CANCELLING HUGE NUMBERS OF COAL PLANTS AND MOVING RAPIDLY TO RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

When you hear from someone who says the US shouldn’t be taking climate action because India and China aren’t, show them this.
VIDEO: https://www.facebook.com/climatereality/videos/10154499175321479/



HOW TRUMP IS HELPING COAL COMPANIES RIP OFF AMERICAN TAXPAYERS AND ASSISTING THEM WITH DODGING PAYS TAXES AS WELL, ALL SO THEY CAN EXPORT THE COAL TO FOREIGN NATIONS 


TYT; Of Course Trump Is Helping Coal Companies Dodge Taxes (and rip off American taxpayers)
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/ZcrNF3EZoKY 5 min.




*facepalm* The Turnbull Government has just announced it wants the Clean Energy Finance Corporation to fund coal with 1 BILLION in taxpayer money.

Just a reminder -- 'clean coal' is an oxymoron favoured by morons, like Donald Trump. Stephen Colbert does a deep dive into explaining 'clean coal'.
VIDEO: https://www.facebook.com/GetUpAustralia/videos/10154391922876455/

WHILE TRUMP PROMOTES COAL, OTHER COUNTRIES ARE TURNING TO CHEAP SUN POWER (AT HALF THE COST OF COAL)

APRIL 1, 2017 A GREEN ROAD DAILY NEWS
MARIA ELENA, Chile – On the solar farms of the Atacama Desert, the workers dress like astronauts. They wear bodysuits and wraparound sunglasses, with thick canvas headscarves to shield them from the radiation.

The sun is so intense and the air so dry that seemingly nothing survives. Across vast, rocky wastes blanched of color, there are no cactuses or other visible signs of life. It is Mars, with better cellphone reception.

It is also the world’s best place to produce solar energy, with the most potent sun power on the planet.

So powerful, in fact, that something extraordinary happened last year when the Chilean government invited utility companies to bid on public contracts. Solar producers dominated the auction, offering to supply electricity at about half the cost of coal-fired plants.
via While Trump promotes coal, other countries are turning to cheap sun power – Prince George Citizen

The scam being pulled on the American people is HUGE... and the ones behind it are nothing but criminals and scam artists. Promoting clean coal is part of the quack hormesis theory, which has been debunked for radium, coal, nuclear and many other fraudulent promotions still going on today.


THE REST OF THE WORLD IS EVOLVING BEYOND EXPENSIVE, TOXIC COAL INTO CLEAN, ZERO CARBON, ZERO POLLUTION RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES


Coal 101: What's Wrong with Coal?

http://www.beyondcoal.org From mining, to burning, to disposal, coal is wreaking havoc on our health and our planet. Powering our country by burning coal is dangerous. It's time to transition Beyond Coal to clean, renewable sources of energy.

RICK SANTORUM ACTUALLY CALLS TRUMP’S DEREGULATION OF THE COAL-INDUSTRY A ‘BREATH OF GOOD AIR’


In this Majority Report clip, we watch former senator Rick Santorum intentionally use multiple “fresh air” and “breath of oxygen” analogies whilst discussing Trump’s deregulation of the coal industry and presumably, moving forward, all industries that are lethal to workers and the planet.


TRUMP IS DELUSIONAL AS HE VOWS TO END NON EXISTENT WAR ON COAL

DAILY SHOW: Trump Vows to End the Nonexistent War on Coal: The Daily Show
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/2aNaY9QDTuM

SUPPORTING OR TRYING TO REVIVE COAL OR NUCLEAR INDUSTRY IS LIKE DEFIBRILLATING A DEAD AND DECAYING CORPSE

Most people have enough common sense to know when someone or something is dead and rotting, just by the 'smell' and the decay of death, but not Trump and his corporate coal and nuclear best buddies. 

They want to bring back nuclear and coal from the dead, despite the flesh rotting off the bones and the stink of death, they are convinced that this person is actually alive and well.. 










BACKING NEW COAL OR NUCLEAR POWER LIKE “DEFIBRILLATING A CORPSE”
APRIL 21, 2017 A GREEN ROAD PROJECT

As the Turnbull government continues its push for new coal power generation in Australia, renowned US scientist and renewable energy advocate Amory Lovins has described the current coal power development pipeline as “pre-stranded assets” and compared attempts to revive the flagging industry to “defibrillating a corpse.”

“Attempting to revive coal or nuclear is like defibrillating a corpse: it will jump but it won’t revive,” Lovins said in an interview with Bloomberg New Energy Finance. “The economic fundamentals are bleak.”………
via Backing new coal power like “defibrillating a corpse” « Antinuclear

The economics of coal and nuclear no longer pencil out. Renewables are cheaper and cleaner, while creating many more sustainable jobs that do not leave when the oil or coal seam runs dry. If your community wants stable jobs that continue on forever, phase out dirty, toxic nuclear and fossil fuels, while phasing in clean, zero carbon, zero nuclear renewable energy sources. 




















Source/credit; The Other 98 Percent

TRUMP'S THREE LIES AND DISGRACEFUL ACTIONS AROUND COAL, THE EPA AND A CLEAN POWER FUTURE; US IS LOSING MARKET SHARE TO COMMUNIST CHINA IN GLOBAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PRODUCTS, PLUS FALLING BEHIND IN INNOVATION, INVENTION AND BREAKTHROUGHS 

Despite a rise in alternative energies, President Trump signs an executive order to roll back regulations on the coal industry. The problem is that those coal jobs won't come back. With his actions, President Trump is giving a huge MARKET advantage to Communist China, because they are moving FAST, taking over the global market share in renewable energy such as solar, wind, and geothermal. As they are taking over the market, they are laughing at the ignorant actions of the US, which under Trump fake leadership, is going backwards, away from innovation, progress and invention. 


Repeal and Disgrace 
SIERRACLUB; "After botching last week's attempt to take away Americans' health insurance, Donald Trump dusted himself off yesterday and launched an all-out attack on clean air, clean water, clean energy, public lands, and our climate. Typically, the results are disgraceful, irresponsible, and of dubious legality.

Source/credit; Noel Wauchope

Things actually got started last Friday when the Trump State Department approved a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline (a terrible decision, but not the end of that fight). Then at the EPA this afternoon, Trump unveiled an executive order aimed at repealing President Obama's Climate Action Plan and the EPA's Clean Power Plan. To do that, he's directing federal agencies to reconsider the mandate to cut emissions from coal-fired power plants, end the moratorium on new coal leases on federal lands, cancel new standards governing methane pollution from oil and gas operations, and throw out any consideration of how carbon pollution harms public health and our economy. There's more, unfortunately, but those are the low points.

It sounds bad (and for everyone but fossil fuel executives and climate-denying crackpots it is bad), but for the most part this is more bluster than well-thought-out policy, and it won't work any better than the Muslim travel ban or the attempt to "repeal and replace" the Affordable Care Act. Trump's big problem is the EPA's previous "endangerment finding," which holds that carbon pollution threatens public health and welfare, and that (per the Supreme Court) it falls under the scope of the Clean Air Act. To change that finding would require convincing a court that Trump and his fossil fuel backers have science on their side, which is right up there with convincing Americans that paying more money for less health insurance is a "really terrific" plan or that a Muslim ban isn't targeting people on the basis of their religion. For that reason alone, these actions are highly vulnerable to legal challenges (and rest assured they will be challenged).

Beyond the dubious legal footing of these actions, though, it's also important to expose the lies behind them.

Lie number one is that Trump can instantly undo our progress. We've already secured the retirement of more than 250 polluting coal plants, and these actions won't undo a single one of those victories.

Lie number two is that doubling down on fossil fuels would somehow increase our "energy independence." Instead, it would prolong our reliance on dirty energy sources even as the rest of the world moves aggressively toward developing clean renewable energy.

Lie number three is that promoting fossil fuel development would create more jobs. The reality (there's that word again) is that Department of Energy data show that clean energy jobs (including from solar, wind, energy efficiency, smart-grid technology, and battery storage) already outnumber all fossil fuel jobs by more than 2.5 to 1. They exceed all jobs in coal and gas by 5 to 1. Promoting fossil fuels over clean energy-which is entirely what Trump's executive order aims to do-will actually hurt job growth. But when have actual facts ever gotten in the way of Trump policy, where down is routinely up and less is always peddled as more?

What we've seen from Donald Trump is exactly what you'd expect from an incompetent policymaker who owes his presidency in large measure to the support of out-of-touch billionaires. As long as Trump keeps ignoring what Americans actually want from their government (which more than ever includes climate action and more investment in clean energy), he's doomed to keep failing.

The Sierra Club and its allies will, of course, work hard to ensure that Trump doesn't succeed in taking America backward on climate, energy, or anything else. As with Trump's other disastrous policies, though, public outcry and resistance to these attacks on climate action needs to be loud and widespread. For that reason, mark April 29 on your calendar to join the Peoples Climate March in Washington, D.C., and around the nation. This is a fight for the future and we haven't a moment to waste."
Via Sierra Club‏Verified account @SierraClub
"Repeal and disgrace" - the latest from @bruneski: http://sc.org/2mQuuIW


HOW BIG COAL INFILTRATED AND SUPPORTED THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WITH A GOAL OF REVERSING CLEAN POWER POLICY


HOW BIG COAL INFILTRATED THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO REVERSE CLIMATE POLICY


Many of the US’s biggest coal companies declared bankruptcy last year, after piling on debt during a series of mergers when coal prices were at a peak. The industry has been suffering for years, thanks to cheaper local natural gas, a federal government push for clean energy, and China’s slowing economy.

President Donald Trump’s executive order yesterday to start dismantling the Clean Power Plan, which limits power-plant carbon emissions, was “an end to the war on coal,” as he put it, and a rare victory for the industry. It’s also no coincidence. Coal executives supported and funded the Trump presidential campaign, and industry-backed lawyers and talking heads stocked his cabinet, even as the industry sputtered and thousands lost their jobs.

In July of last year, Robert Murray, CEO of Murray Energy, the largest coal-mining company in the US, blamed Barack Obama and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for “virtually destroying
View original post 716 more words

THE NEWEST WAY OF GETTING COAL DESTROYS MOUNTAINS, STREAMS, RIVERS, DRINKING WATER, WELLS AND HEALTH OF COMMUNITIES

The war on Nature continues. The problem is that this war cannot be won and Nature always bats last, and wins every time. Why keep trying to destroy Nature and human health plus the environment, plus animals, via a lose lose war?

Blowing Up Mountains: Destroying the Environment for Coal
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/UvKe2LYy5pk

"Massive corporations are blowing up mountains and creating environmental ruins in West Virginia. All this devastation, just to extract some coal.

We went to West Virginia to investigate mountain-top removal -- which is the newest way of extracting coal from deposits under mountains. Instead of drilling into the mountain and sending men underground to take out the coal in the traditional way, they just take the whole top of a mountain off."

The above video also details injection wells that coal companies use to inject poisonous coal slurry waste underground. Then people wonder why those same poisons show up in their wells and drinking water.



WHAT HAPPENS IN AN AVERAGE TOWN WITH A COAL FIRED POWER PLANT?

Coal - EP 3 - Roof Bolter Runs Risk

Being a roof bolter is the most dangerous job with the highest fatality rate in these mines. Hank must secure all the freshly dug ceilings, running the risk of them collapsing on him. You have to be crazy to do this job. 

First, let's take a look at the average town, and the data collected about total environmental releases of toxic materials.. Let's see what is going on in Tonawanda...

Source/credit; US Uncut, Labor 411


Notice the top and worst ranking on this whole list?

It is a coal fired energy plant.

Hmmmm, what does it emit?

For one thing, coal mines emit massive amounts of methane, which is orders of magnitude worse than CO2 in terms of global warming. Of course, burning and mining coal also releases large amounts of C02, which also causes global warming and climate change. Coal mining mainly benefits the 1 percent, who get rich off the labor, suffering, diseases and deaths of the 99 percent. 

Coal Mining: The Dangerous Job on EARTH - DOCFILMS
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/MCsAI6ItU60 45 min

The above movie is a  pro coal propaganda film, which CLAIMS that coal is clean. The movie does not focus on the damage caused to the environment, people's health or to future generations. With over 250 square miles of coal left underground just in the US, the destruction of humanity is guaranteed, if even a small amount of that coal is mined and burned, due to the negative impacts that this causes. Coal, oil and gas must be kept underground, and not mined or extracted. We do have a choice and we need to make the RIGHT choice for 7 future generations, and not leave them a desolate, barren lifeless wasteland filled with poison.

Derek Charette This is sickening. We are ripping apart billions of tons of 400 million year old elements in the earth, and burning them up in fucking smoke... yet, we have had the technology for decades that would of left all of this coal right in the ground where it belongs, all because a few rich cocksuckers don't want us to have renewable, free energy, because they make a fortune on fossil fuels.

Let's follow this dirty toxic coal filled rabbit hole and see what else is down there.

ANY COAL MINE OR COAL PLANT IS A VERY DIRTY GLOBAL WARMING, CLIMATE CHANGING AND TOXIC BUSINESS; IN LINK ABOVE, IT IS RANKED AS THE DIRTIEST AND LARGEST TOXIC CHEMICAL EMITTER IN THE AREA, BUT TRUMP AND HIS CABAL CALL IT 'CLEAN'

President Trump and his pro coal supporters claim coal is 'clean', over and over and over again. This claim is known as the hormesis theory, and all dirty, toxic, poison selling industries use it. Many people believe this hormesis theory, despite it not being true.

TRUMP LIES AS HE IS PROMOTING THE CLEAN AND GOOD FOR YOU COAL HORMESIS THEORY, WHICH AGR DEBUNKS HERE


The hormesis theory claims that poison cannot hurt you, via tobacco, asbestos, radon, radium, mercury, arsenic, uranium, and other poisonous heavy metal products. Do you believe? Do you have a cult like faith in the hormesis benefits of 'clean' coal?

Ann Coulter, Forbes, Conca, Corbett Report All Agree; More Heavy Metal Radioactive Poison Is Good For You, Mass Media And Pro Nuclear Industry Hormesis Theory Promoting Propaganda All Agree
https://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/08/ann-coulter-says-more-radiation-is-good.html


Source/credit; The Other 98 percent

Why Clean Coal Is A Myth
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/T9neWyZdF8M?t=2m20s 3 min

AMERICA REVEALED | Where Does Our Coal Come From? | PBS

Coal mines destroy the landscape and pollute our waterways with toxic heavy metal poisons. Below is a picture of just ONE coal mine from space. This area used to be virgin, pure, and clean grasslands plus clean waterways. Now it is a toxic heavy metal poison filled area of huge pits collecting rain water, which drain into waterways that humans and animals use for drinking water downstream. 


ANOTHER COAL INDUSTRY DIRTY, TOXIC HEAVY METAL POISONS CONTAINING WASTE SECRET; COAL ASH 


America's Dirty Secret: Coal Ash

(Earth Focus: Episode 64) People in three adjacent Pennsylvania communities suffer from a rare blood cancer. In Juliette, Georgia, where radioactive water flows from the tap, people are also getting sick. What else do these communities have in common? Coal ash. Some 130 million tons of it is generated in the US each year. It contains toxins like lead, arsenic and mercury and it gets into ground water from unlined pond and pit storage sites. The federal government says it's non-hazardous and regulation is left to state governments where the coal industry has great influence. And it's always people who suffer the consequences.

Read Earth Focus correspondent Miles Benson's blog post, "Coal Ash: Both Beneficial and Poisonous?": https://www.linktv.org/earth-focus-bl...

Source/credit; US Uncut

VICENEWS; "Toxic Waste in the US: Coal Ash (Full Length)
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/hvx-W-XAie0 24 min.


Coal ash, which contains many of the world's worst carcinogens, is what's left over when coal is burnt for electricity. An estimated 113 million tons of coal ash are produced annually in the US, and stored in almost every state — some of it literally in people's backyards. With very little government oversight and few safeguards in place, toxic chemicals have been known to leak from these storage sites and into nearby communities, contaminating drinking water and making residents sick.

VICE News travels across the US to meet the people and visit the areas most affected by this toxic waste stream. Since coal production is predicted to remain steady for the next few decades, coal ash will be a problem that will affect the US for years to come.

Watch "Showdown in Coal Country" - http://bit.ly/16LRifW

Watch "Petcoke: Toxic Waste in the Windy City" - http://bit.ly/1E2YejO

Read "Green Groups Say Another Coal Ash Spill Remains Likely, One Year After North Carolina Accident" - http://bit.ly/1A7dVaC

Read "Humans Are Destroying the Environment at a Rate Unprecedented in Over 10,000 Years" - http://bit.ly/1vgvC1R

Read "The Economic Cost of Carbon Pollution Is Much Greater Than Estimated, Say Stanford University Researchers" - http://bit.ly/1ATb1b0

TRUMP ACCUSES ASSAD OF POISONING OWN PEOPLE; THEN SIGNS LAW THAT ALLOWS COAL COMPANIES TO DUMP POISONS INTO DRINKING WATER 

Would any parent with any common sense whatsoever allow ANYONE to poison their drinking water? Who would support someone that intentionally poisons drinking water? Well, some people do that, and some people are willing to support genocide as well, plus fascist dictators too... 
Salma Sultana The atom bombs are piling up in the factories, the police are prowling through the cities, the lies are streaming from the loudspeakers, but the earth is still going round the sun." --George Orwell.

Zachary Gowdy Cue people who start responding to this post by saying "But Obama!" or "But Hillary!" If your argument relies on comparing that who you champion to someone else, rather than lifting them up on their own merits, than your argument has failed.

Bruce Borylo The scary thing about this......he sees nothing wrong with any of this!!! He's completely divorced from reality and living in his "fake universe,"

COAL PLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DEATHS AND DISEASES FROM JUST ONE COAL PLANT, DUE TO EMITTING TONS OF HEAVY METAL POISONS SMALLER THAN 2.5 MICRONS


Emissions Data

2006 CO2 Emissions: 3,301,283 tons

2006 SO2 Emissions: 12,299 tons

2006 SO2 Emissions per MWh:

2006 NOx Emissions: 3,265 tons

2005 Mercury Emissions: 167 lb.

Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from Huntley Generating Station
In 2010, Abt Associates issued a study commissioned by the Clean Air Task Force, a nonprofit research and advocacy organization, quantifying the deaths and other health effects attributable to fine particle pollution from coal-fired power plants.[4] Fine particle pollution consists of a complex mixture of soot, heavy metals, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. 

Among these particles, the most dangerous are those less than 2.5 microns in diameter, which are so tiny that they can evade the lung's natural defenses, enter the bloodstream, and be transported to vital organs. 


Impacts are especially severe among the elderly, children, and those with respiratory disease. The study found that over 13,000 deaths and tens of thousands of cases of chronic bronchitis, acute bronchitis, asthma, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, chronic lung disease, and pneumonia each year are attributable to fine particle pollution from U.S. coal plant emissions. 

These deaths and illnesses are major examples of coal's external costs, i.e. uncompensated harms inflicted upon the public at large. Low-income and minority populations are disproportionately impacted
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Huntley_Generating_Station_(existing)

THE VICTIMS OF THE DIRTY, TOXIC COAL INDUSTRY ARE LARGELY IGNORED, DENIED, AND CANNOT BE HELPED, EXCEPT WITH HIGH PROFIT, TOXIC AND NEGATIVE SIDE EFFECT PRODUCING BIG PHARMA DRUGS PRESCRIBED BY DOCTORS WHO STAND BY AND DO NOTHING TO STOP ALL OF THESE DEVASTATION


Betting on Trump: Coal | FRONTLINE
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/j8X4qDDgj20?t=6m15s

Above video details just one victim of black lung disease, which is caused by working in the coal industry as a miner, breathing in coal dust for years. Cancelling Obamacare will affect people like this, who are suffering from black lung disease. 

Listen to what this life long coal miner says about coal mining jobs and what he would say to a young person who wants to work in this field as a coal miner. 

BURNING COAL RESULTS IN TOXIC AND DEADLY HEAVY METAL POISONS BEING DEPOSITED ON SOIL, IN THE WATER AND INTO THE AIR


Source/credit; The Other 98 Percent

COAL MINES ARE AN EARTH KILLING PROBLEM; THE MINES GET LARGER AND GENERATE MORE PROFIT FOR THE 1 PERCENT AT THE TOP, WHILE THE 99 PERCENT, ENVIRONMENT, COMMUNITIES PLUS EARTH SUFFER AND DIE

This is the largest coal mine in Europe, with the largest coal mining equipment, using less people, to generate even more profit. 

Inside Germany's Most Harmful Energy Source: Brown Coal Blues



VICE: "The Rhineland region of Germany has more CO2 pollution than any part of Europe due to its many coal mines. That's why climate activists organized the largest protest against coal production that Germany has ever seen.

To find out why we are still using such harmful energy sources, VICE Germany spoke with coal workers, environmentalists, and residents about climate goals, power plant technology, and a future without coal. We see entire towns and vast forests that have been evacuated to mine coal. Watch as we search for the truth about Germany's energy policy."

TRUMP'S EPA WILL NOT CLASSIFY COAL ASH AS A TOXIC WASTE PRODUCT

EPA Will Not Declare Coal Ash A Hazardous Waste
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Friday issued its first-ever regulations on coal ash, a toxic byproduct of burning coal for power. But to environmentalists’ chagrin, the agency declined to designate the substance as a hazardous waste. Instead, coal ash will be regulated similarly to household garbage. EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy assured reporters on Friday that designating coal ash as solid waste, rather than hazardous waste, would be sufficient to prevent catastrophic spills of coal ash from the ponds the substance is often stored in, and to prevent it from leaching into groundwater, as it has in the past.

WHAT HAPPENS TO LIQUID HEAVY METAL POISON CONTAINING TOXIC COAL WASTE PRODUCED BY MINING COAL? IT ENDS UP IN TOXIC COAL WASTE PONDS, WHERE IT LEACHES INTO GROUNDWATER, RIVERS AND STREAMS


In Dec. 2008, a HUGE coal ash slurry storage pond broke and dumped decades worth of heavy metal poison containing coal ash slurry into a US river, poisoning the water (what happened to the river based drinking water for everyone downstream?). Residents are interviewed...

CBS 60 Minutes; Coal Ash: 130 Million Tons of Waste

If coal ash is safe to spread under a golf course or be used in carpets, why are the residents of Kingston, Tenn., being told to stay out of a river where the material was spilled? Lesley Stahl reports.

113 MILLION TONS OF TOXIC HEAVY METAL POISON CONTAINING ASH IS PRODUCED EACH YEAR IN THE US, VIA THE COAL BURNING INDUSTRY; BUT THERE IS NO PLACE TO PUT IT



Watch Part One "Toxic Waste Spill in North Carolina" 

The Largest Coal Ash Pond in the US: Coal Ash (Part 2)
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/hTMgOPc0F2k



Coal ash, which contains many of the world's worst carcinogens, is what's left over when coal is burnt for electricity. An estimated 113 million tons of coal ash are produced annually in the US, and stored in almost every state — some of it literally in people's backyards. With very little government oversight and few safeguards in place, toxic chemicals have been known to leak from these storage sites and into nearby communities, contaminating drinking water and making residents sick.

In the final part of our series, VICE News travels to Pennsylvania, home to the largest coal ash pond in the country, which continues to leak dangerous pollutants out into the community.


Watch "Showdown in Coal Country" - http://bit.ly/16LRifW

Watch "Petcoke: Toxic Waste in the Windy City" - http://bit.ly/1E2YejO

CONCRETE CAN LEGALLY CONTAIN UP TO 35 PERCENT TOXIC HEAVY METAL CONTAINING COAL ASH, FLY ASH BRICKS CAN BE 100 PERCENT 

Here is how toxic heavy metal poison containing coal ash ends up on concrete used to put into homes, driveways, roads and more all around the world. What happens when the dust from this concrete gets inhaled?
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/KR6vGFIG-_U

Toxic heavy metal poison containing coal fly ash bricks
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/EyHLJCgG-O8

New Use for Coal Ash? | NC Science Now | UNCTV
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/VKlyoRfXUWI

HEALTH DEPARTMENTS CLAIM IT IS OK TO DRINK POISON IN THE WATER WHICH COMES FROM BURNING AND MINING COAL, DESPITE ARSENIC EXCEEDING SAFE DRINKING WATER ACTION LEVEL


laconic93 May 26, 2016 Tests conducted last month by the Virginia Department of Health said the Marrows’ water “does not represent a health hazard” despite traces of cobalt and strontium, both of which have been tied to coal ash.

The health department found aluminum, boron, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel and strontium in West’s well. All are contaminants associated with coal ash, but the health department said the levels detected are low enough “to meet requirements for public drinking water.”

A second test of West’s well, however, was less reassuring.

Results from the Virginia Cooperative Extension, which has its samples analyzed by Virginia Tech, showed lead levels in West’s water between four and 10 times the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s “action level” for lead, which is 15 parts per billion. West’s water showed lead as high as 120 parts per billion.

For more details on the harm caused by CO2 emitting power plants, factories, homes and vehicles, see articles below...

ACIDIFICATION OF OCEANS IS CAUSED BY BURNING COAL

Acid rain and acid oceans have a root cause, and that cause is burning coal. View the information above to see the massive amounts of acid waste products emitted by coal plants into the air and water. All of this acid has to go somewhere, and it all ends up in the oceans via rainfall and rivers. Remember that CO2 is ACID, and so is sulfur dioxide. 

95-98% Of All Acid Rain Originates From Human Created Carbon (Coal) Fuel Burning CO2; Negatively Affects Soil, Birds, Plants, Trees, Oceans Plus People

Acid Test; The Global Challenge Of Ocean Acidification; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/06/acid-test-global-challenge-of-ocean.html

Acid Oceans; Why Should We Care? via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/06/acid-oceans-why-should-we-care.html

NOAA - A Simple Explanation of Ocean Acidification; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/09/noaa-simple-explanation-of-ocean.html

Acid Test; The Global Challenge Of Ocean Acidification; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/06/acid-test-global-challenge-of-ocean.html

Acid Oceans; Why Should We Care? via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/06/acid-oceans-why-should-we-care.html

MORE ROOT CAUSES OF OCEAN ACIDIFICATION

Nuclear Energy As A Direct Cause Of Global Warming, Acid Rain, Acid Oceans And Super Storms; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/nuclear-energy-as-direct-cause-of.html

Fukushima Created Radioactive Sulfur, Acid Rain, Acid Ocean And Radioactive Chlorine, Which Reached The USA
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/04/fukushima-radioactive-sulfur-and.html

Radioactive Carbon 14 From Nuclear Power Plants Causing Deforestation, Fungus Infections, Disease And Death Of Trees And Plants Globally - Global Warming
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/05/carbon-14-emitted-by-nuclear-power.html

MORE THAN 150 UNDERGROUND COAL FIRES ARE HAPPENING IN US, THOUSANDS ARE HAPPENING GLOBALLY


Pennsylvania's 50-Year-Old Coal Fire
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/v6F0TuV3JMg




SciShow takes you to Centralia, Pennsylvania, site of one of the oldest, biggest coal fires in the United States, and explains the chemistry of spontaneous combustion.

WHAT HAPPENS TO THE HEALTH OF THE RESIDENTS LIVING AROUND DIRTY TOXIC BUSINESSES LIKE THIS? 


Sickputer April 9, 2016 I just read two days ago in my local West Texas newspaper an article by Carolyn Thompson on AP about a couple in west New York who had one child born with no limbs and now while pregnant the wife has a brain tumor and had surgery to save her life, but she was laying off radiation and chemo to help her unborn fetus.

No mention at all about the cause of her illness, but a simple search showed 22 Superfund sites in her hometown of Tonawanda and a blaring article warning the poor fokkers living there:

For Ms. Thompson to write a human interest article without any questions concerning the causation of that family's distress is irresponsible journalism.

Late in her article Ms. Thompson drops this family history tidbit:

"In the meantime, they will start interviewing nannies to help care for the newborn and the rest of the children, among them 7-year-old Josie, who was born without arms and legs. Phil's leave from his maintenance job with the town of Tonawanda is coming to an end."
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/mom-delays-cancer-care-protect-baby-saved-37993758

SP: For the love of Pete, does the author not understand that there is another story behind that poor woman's plight! The f@@king town is dying in their industrial filth!"

MAP OF CITY POLLUTION, GENERATED BY BURNING DIRTY CARBON AND NUCLEAR FUELS


Showing huge city mega plumes of pollution from fossil and nuclear fuel emissions globally.
VIDEO: http://youtu.be/x9bqzX7pBlA 2 min.

COAL PLANTS ARE DIRTY AND TOXIC, BUT THEY ARE NOTHING COMPARED TO NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS


City Pollution Growth - Megacity Pollution Plumes

Coal is very dirty and toxic, but it still does not hold a candle to the much more toxic and radioactive nuclear plants.

Krypton 85 – 1,800,000 Bq Radioactive Gases Released From Each Nuclear Reactor Vent Stack Each Second; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/10/krypton-85-1800000-bq-radioactive-gases.html

All Nuclear Reactors Release Massive Quantities Of Invisible And Undetectable Tritium Radiation, Creating 'HOT' Rain Or Snow
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/06/all-reactors-release-massive-quantities.html

100% US Nuclear Plants Leaking Toxic Tritium Radiation Into Drinking Water Supply
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/75-us-nuclear-plants-leaking-toxic.html

Regular HUGE Radiation Releases/Venting Spikes During Refueling Is Normal And Routine For All Nuclear Power Plants; Emissions Go Into Air, Drinking Water And Ground
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2015/03/regular-huge-radiation-releasesventing.html

EXAMPLE OF THE LIE THAT COAL EMITS MORE RADIATION THAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Graph shows amount of deadly heavy metal radioactive poisons released from just ONE coal plant in ONE year...


Coal plants are dirty and emit both heavy metals, poisonous gases, acid gases, and radiation, but they don't hold a candle to what comes out of a nuclear plant, which are orders of magnitude worse. 

Via sourceofrealnews; Blog "Coal plants emit more radioactivity than Nuclear power plants.

Over the past few decades, however, a series of studies has called these stereotypes into question. Among the surprising conclusions: the waste produced by coal plants is actually more radioactive than that generated by their nuclear counterparts. In fact, the fly ash emitted by a power plant—a by-product from burning coal for electricity—carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy. * [See Editor's Note at end of page 2] (Link)

This of course ignores a whole bunch of issues. It ignores the fact that during the mining of uranium, radiation is released into the environment as well. Another article that makes the same claim is a little fairer when it gives us the number of the whole process:

For comparison, according to NCRP Reports No. 92 and No. 95, population exposure from operation of 1000-MWe nuclear and coal-fired power plants amounts to 490 person-rem/year for coal plants and 4.8 person-rem/year for nuclear plants. Thus, the population effective dose equivalent from coal plants is 100 times that from nuclear plants. For the complete nuclear fuel cycle, from mining to reactor operation to waste disposal, the radiation dose is cited as 136 person-rem/year; the equivalent dose for coal use, from mining to power plant operation to waste disposal, is not listed in this report and is probably unknown.(link)

There a bit of a difference between 136 rem per year and 4.8 rem per year. But even that pales in comparison to the “Editor’s note” at the end of page 2.

In response to some concerns raised by readers, a change has been made to this story. The sentence marked with an asterisk was changed from “In fact, fly ash—a by-product from burning coal for power—and other coal waste contains up to 100 times more radiation than nuclear waste” to “In fact, the fly ash emitted by a power plant—a by-product from burning coal for electricity—carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy.” Our source for this statistic is Dana Christensen, an associate lab director for energy and engineering at Oak Ridge National Laboratory as well as 1978 paper in Science authored by J.P. McBride and colleagues, also of ORNL.

As a general clarification, ounce for ounce, coal ash released from a power plant delivers more radiation than nuclear waste shielded via water or dry cask storage.

This is where the cat comes out of the bag. They’re comparing coal ash released from a power plant with nuclear waste that is properly being shielded. This is of course comparing apples and oranges. First of all nuclear waste isn’t properly shielded. Nuclear waste gets into the environment all the time.

For example, The Herald reported recently: A nuclear power station has been sent a final warning letter after radioactive waste leaked into the sea. Around 2600 litres of low-level waste was discharged from Hunterston B into the Firth of Clyde because of a problem with a valve. The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) said the leak did not cause an environmental issue, but it issued the Ayrshire power station with a final warning letter because procedures were not followed.(Link)

DECEPTIVE CLAIM IS BASED ON FALSE ASSUMPTIONS


In other words, the claim that nuclear waste is less radioactive than coal waste assumes that the waste is properly stored behind water which absorbs ALL of the radiation, whereas in reality, the nuclear waste often is released into our environment, where it will enter the food chain, our atmosphere, and eventually settle into our bodies. This means that the article is dealing with a hypothetical situation that will never occur in reality. The author is very much aware of this.

However, 95% of people will simply see the headline and perhaps read the first few paragraphs of his article before moving on and will never question it. They will just remember “coal plants are 100 times more radioactive than nuclear power plants”. They won’t question the facts and assumptions made to arrive at this conclusion and make up their minds on the basis of a cheap one-liner.

SPENT FUEL NUCLEAR WASTE IS MUCH MORE DANGEROUS THAN COAL WASTE PRODUCTS


Second, radioactive nuclear waste is inherently more dangerous than the natural isotopes we get from coal. I have brought this argument up earlier, and it is true for this case as well. For example, we have about three times the plutonium waste than was earlier estimated in the United States alone. (Link)Plutonium is a second event emitter.

The waste created by nuclear power plants is chemically toxic as well. The artificial isotopes created by nuclear power plants are not comparable to the isotopes in coal emissions. All of this increases the complexity of comparing different types radioactive material.

COAL PLANTS DON'T BLOW UP OR MELT DOWN, BUT NUCLEAR PLANTS AND ATOMIC BOMBS DO


Then there is the fact that when nuclear power plants blow up, they release far more nuclear waste than coal plants have in all of recorded history. In fact, the Chernobyl accident is estimated to have released 25–50 million curies (1–2 exabecquerels) (IAEA estimations), whereas the collective radioactivity resulting from all coal burning worldwide between 1937 and 2040 is estimated to be 2,700,000 curies or 0.101 EBq).

In other words the Chernobyl accident alone released ten times as much radiation as all coal burning worldwide between 1937 and 2040 did. The disaster currently unfolding in Japan shows us that meltdowns are still possible. However, it must again be mentioned that the artificial isotopes released in the Chernobyl disaster are hard to compare to the natural radioactive isotopes in our environment, because some of them are Second event emitters.

COAL CAUSES DEATHS, BUT FISSION PROCESS CAUSES EVEN MORE, BOTH MUST BE ABOLISHED


Then, there has to be a final point made. Nobody ever said that coal plants are safe either. The argument made here is comparable to the argument that “it is safe to smoke cigarettes, because injecting heroin is 100 times as lethal as smoking a cigarette”. Even coal plants cause deaths and birth defects. China’s main coal producing province has the highest birth defect rate in the entire country for example.(Link) Dirty coal ought to be rejected in the same manner that nuclear power should be.

CHERNOBYL RELEASED 10 TIMES MORE RADIATION THAN ALL COAL PLANTS ON THE PLANET HISTORICALLY


However, the overwhelming evidence points towards coal plants still being nowhere near the danger that is posed by nuclear power plants, because all coal plants on the planet still released less than 10 times the amount of radiation released during the Chernobyl disaster.
Source: http://sourceofrealnews.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/nuclear-propagandists-lies-exposed-and-debunked-by-david-rothscum-reports

USGS STUDIES SHOW COAL PLANT EMISSIONS CAUSE MINOR INCREASE IN RADIATION EXPOSURE FOR RESIDENTS WITHIN 1 KM


The radiation hazard from airborne emissions of coal-fired power plants was evaluated in a series of studies conducted from 1975–1985. These studies concluded that the maximum radiation dose to an individual living within 1 km of a modern power plant is equivalent to a minor, perhaps 1 to 5 percent, increase above the radiation from the natural environment. For the average citizen, the radiation dose from coal burning is considerably less. Components of the radiation environment that impact the U.S. population are illustrated in figure 4. Natural sources account for the majority (82 percent) of radiation. Man-made sources of radiation are dominated by medical X-rays (11 percent). On this plot, the average population dose attributed to coal burning is included under the consumer products category and is much less than 1 percent of the total dose. 

Fly ash is commonly used as an additive to concrete building products, but the radioactivity of typical fly ash is not significantly different from that of more conventional concrete additives or other build-ing materials such as granite or red brick. One extreme calculation that assumed high proportions of fly-ash-rich concrete in a residence suggested a dose enhancement, compared to normal concrete, of 3 percent of the natural environmental radiation. 
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1997/fs163-97/FS-163-97.html

Conventional coal-fired power plant

Citizendium; "As most ores in the Earth's crust, coal also contains trace levels of uranium, thorium, and other naturally-occurring radioactive elements.

A report developed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) estimated that the amount of coal burned each year in a typical 1000 MW coal-fired power plant contained about 5.2 tonnes of uranium and about 12.8 tonnes of thorium.[31] The basis of ORNL estimate was that the annual coal consumption was 4 Mt and that the coal contained 1.3 ppm of uranium and 3.2 ppm of thorium.

Assuming that all of the uranium and thorium would be emitted into the fly ash and that the electrostatic precipitators would capture and remove 99% of the fly ash, the emissions of radioactive trace elements to the atmosphere from a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant would be 52 kg/yr of uranium and 128 kg/yr of thorium.

The average annual radiation dose received by a person from all sources (cosmic radiation, radioactivity in the soil, food, water, air and miscellaneous other sources) is 360 millirem.[32] The annual radiation dose (from naturally occurring radioactivity in coal) received by persons living within 80 km of a coal-fired power plant is estimated to be 0.03 millirem.[32][33]

The ORNL report discussed earlier,[31]states that All studies of potential health hazards associated with the release of radioactive elements from coal combustion conclude that the perturbation of natural background dose levels is almost negligible and a U.S. EPA report[34] states that the lifetime fatal cancer risk from exposure to radionuclides to the vast majority of persons living within 50 km of an electric power plant is estimated to be less than 1×10-6.

To be sure, all coal plants must be shut down, because they are too dirty and toxic, but nuclear energy is by far even more toxic and deadly, due to the numerous global warming and poisonous elements plus gases that they emit. 

Nuclear Energy As A Direct Cause Of Global Warming, Acid Rain, Acid Oceans, Extreme Weather, And Super Storms
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/nuclear-energy-as-direct-cause-of.html

Nuclear Power; EXPENSIVE, Dirty, Dangerous And Toxic; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/10/nuclear-power-expensive-dirty-dangerous.html

BOTH COAL AND NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS CAUSE HUGE INCREASES IN DISEASES, CANCERS, AND DEATHS


By comparison, nuclear plants cause HUGE increases in rates of cancers and diseases for people living around them. 

Nuclear Power Plant Studies Show Child Leukemia, Breast, Thyroid Cancer Rates Increase RADICALLY Closer To Plants; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/10/child-leukemia-breast-thyroid-cancer.html

CARBON FUEL COMPANIES INCLUDING THOSE THAT BURN COAL, RECEIVE 88 BILLION PER YEAR IN CORPORATE WELFARE ENTITLEMENTS


The Guardian exposes the fact that despite the world's nations agreeing that carbon emissions must be cut by a huge amount, carbon fuel companies are still receiving 88 Billion per year in subsidies each year. The nuclear industry also receives a huge subsidy, despite it also being global warming. Meanwhile, the fossil fuel industry only receives about 10% of what the nuclear industry receives alone, all by itself. Add in the carbon fuel industry subsidies and the share that renewables receives shrinks even more drastically. 
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/11/rich-countries-subsidising-oil-gas-and-coal-companies-by-88bn-a-year?CMP=EMCENVEML1631

Nuclear Plants Are Six Times More Expensive To Operate Than ANY Other Type Of Power Plants
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/09/nuclear-plants-are-six-times-more.html

NUCLEAR IS MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE THAN SOLAR OR OTHER RENEWABLES

Why does this dirty, polluting, lying and deceptive industry deserve taxpayer corporate welfare payments just to keep them in business?

12 reasons why all nuclear power plants must be shut down; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/03/12-reasons-why-all-nuclear-power-plants.html

If the nuclear industry is allowed to continue, it will result in the suicidal extinction of all life on the planet, via the Carrington Event.

Super Solar Storm To Hit Earth; 'Carrington Effect'; 400 Nuke Plants Will Melt Down/Explode
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/03/super-solar-storm-predicted-to-hit-2013.html

What result do people expect, when almost all of the money is thrown at the problem, instead of the solution? What do people expect, when the biggest problems are ignored or denied, while the solutions are attacked, suppressed and ignored by the mass media? 

Solar Energy Usage And Costs Compared To Nuclear And Coal Costs/Usage; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-solar-energy-energy-usage-and-costs.html

IF TRUMP REALLY WANTED TO CREATE MORE JOBS, HE SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON WHERE THE DOUBLE DIGIT JOB GROWTH IS ALREADY HAPPENING AND MAKE IT HAPPEN FASTER


Humanity used to burn wood for energy. That age is over and done with. 

Humanity used to burn dirty toxic coal, oil and gas for energy and heat. That age is over and done with.

Humanity used to burn dirty, toxic uranium for energy and heat. That age is also over and done with.

What is coming is the age of clean renewable energy such as solar, water, wind, geothermal and tides. 


GREENCARREPORT; CLEAN ENERGY PROVIDES FAR MORE U.S. JOBS THAN FOSSIL FUELS: ANALYSIS

What the president has apparently overlooked in his latest actions is that the clean-energy industry already accounts for far more U.S. jobs than does the fossil-fuel sector.

DON’T MISS: Trump Administration goal: undo every climate-change effort

That little-known fact is based on a review of U.S. Department of Energy’s own jobs data for the energy sector.

It was brought to public attention in a Sierra Club report that shows jobs in the clean-energy industries outnumber those associated with fossil fuels by roughly 2.5 to 1.

Trump has promised to “bring back coal” and its associated jobs—a goal virtually every energy analyst says is simply unattainable—but that sector fares even worse.

It is time to create a carbon, chemical and nuclear free future. Have you heard of a solar, wind, water or geothermal plant blowing up and then melting down? Have you heard of any of these needing to have nuclear waste stored for 1 million years? Have you heard of any of these quadrupling in cost, without even the cost of decommissioning? No?  Humanity has been led by wolves dressed in sheep's clothing, and it is about time to undress the wolves, show them the door and let the truth out. 

Isn't it about time to switch the subsidies from the carbon and nuclear industries to the 100% carbon free renewable energy segment?

Environment, Holistic Living, Health, Self-Healing, Zero Point And Renewable Energy
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/green-energy-green-living.html

If humanity wants to live through the carbon and fission age, it must say goodbye to it all and let both carbon and nuclear fuels go, in order to have any chance at a sustainable future.

PRESIDENT TRUMP IS UNDOING ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS THAT PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND COMMUNITIES AND FORCING DIRTY, TOXIC, WORLD DESTROYING OIL, COAL AND NUCLEAR ON COMMUNITIES AND SOVEREIGN INDIAN NATION

With the help of President Trump, EPA regulations being undone, which allow poison fossil fuel producing companies to dump their toxic waste into rivers, wells, streams and pollute the environment as much as they want. 
VIDEO: https://www.facebook.com/MicMedia/videos/1452621104760675/

Get involved. Get active..


RELATED ARTICLES

Can World Keep Using 1 Cubic Mile Of Oil With No Consequences? Nuclear Power Industry Self Destructing; What Happens Next?
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/09/peak-oil-are-we-over-peak-and-if-so.html

The Downsides Of Canada's Dirty Oil Sands, Addiction Leading To Apocalypse, Michael Ruppert; Addicted To the Last Drop Of Toxic Carbon Fuel, Obstructing A Clean Renewable Energy Future
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/10/to-last-drop-canadas-dirty-oil-sands.html

Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert Discuss Sinkholes of Stupid, Empires Of Radioactive Fracking Idiocracy Plus Peak Oil; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/10/max-keiser-and-stacy-herbert-discuss.html

Top Global Warming Denialists Funded By Corporations
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/06/top-global-warming-denialists-funded-by.html

CO2 Added By Humanity Is More Than 200 Times All Volcanoes Combined, As Oxygen Levels, Human Intelligence, Reaction Times, Health And Environment Deteriorates
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/08/as-co2-levels-rise-human-intelligence.html

Peak Oil - Are We Over The Peak, And If So, What Happens Next?
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/09/peak-oil-are-we-over-peak-and-if-so.html

Earthquake Causing, Toxic Sinkholes of Stupid, Empires Of Radioactive Fracking Idiocracy
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/10/max-keiser-and-stacy-herbert-discuss.html

Fracking Radioactive Waste Generating Companies, Landfills And Garbage Dumps Near You Are Getting Into Nuclear Waste Disposal Business, In Pursuit Of Shale Oil
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2015/03/fracking-companies-landfills-and-dumps.html

Radioactive Heavy Metal Poisonous NORM/TENORM Waste Produced By Carbon, Oil, Gas Fuel Industry And Then Contaminating Air, Ground And Water Is Huge Problem, Methane From Coal, Oil Or Carbon Fuel
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2015/12/radioactive-heavy-metal-poisonous-norm.html

Uranium Mining, Enrichment, Nuclear Fuel Chain, Open Air Testing, Fracking
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/uranium-mining-and-enrichment.html

SUMMARY



This is not the time to look backwards and try to stop the future from happening, Change is the only constant that is present in Nature and in society. Rather than resist change, embrace it both within and without. 

If the goal is to produce the maximum number of jobs, the choices are clear....



Trump is choosing the top three, and forcing the US to concentrate on those, rather than on the rest of the list. Does this even make any logical sense at all?

WHAT YOU CAN DO

Get involved. Show up at city council and county meetings. Send them the link to this article. 

Talk about these choices and urge local leaders to pursue the higher job creation options, and the cleaner energy options. 

VOTE! 

Vote only for candidates that take no corporate money and who are not billionaires, unless you want more corporate owned 1 percent friendly candidates like Trump and just about everyone in Congress now. 


Do a carbon footprint analysis and then set a goal of reducing your carbon footprint to zero. 


Carbon Footprint; How To Calculate It For Home, Farm, Business; Zero Carbon, Zero Nuclear Future Required, How To Turn 6 Pounds Of Gasoline Into 20 Pounds Of CO2; How And Why Nuclear Energy Is Not The Answer

Do a carbon food based analysis and reduce your food based carbon footprint. 

Calculate Your Carbon FOOD Based Footprint; Eating Animal Products Like Beef Creates Huge Carbon Footprint And Largest Source Of Global Warming Carbon Pollution Globally; What Is Single Best Thing To Do In Order To Achieve A Zero Carbon Lifestyle?
https://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2015/10/calculate-your-carbon-food-based.html


Keep on asking the question above and then do that, but nothing else. 

WHAT YOU CAN DO; ENDORSE, LEARN, TRANSFORM, DONATE, SHARE, SUPPORT, SPONSOR, CONNECT, COMMENT, AND/OR COLLABORATE

DONATE

Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Donate To A Green Road Project; Help Dr. Goodheart Teach How To Make A Positive Difference For Seven Future Generations Of Children, Animals, Plants And The Planet

TRANSLATE

Click to Translate; 60 languages - German, French, Russian, Spanish

JOIN THE NETWORK OF OTHER ACTIVISTS; PLUG INTO AGRP


* Join the AGR Network. Forward this or any other article by clicking on the social media facebook, google plus and/or twitter buttons below any AGRP article. The first step for activists is to bring awareness of an issue to the public, by being informed yourself. Which news and information network do you prefer to plug into and network with?








 Email AGRP

RSS Feed

Subscribe to; A Green Road Project Magazine, monthly issues
It is easy to join the AGRP network, and your email will never be rented, sold or shared.

Subscribe/sign up, give feedback, or offer news tips or story ideas by sending an email to agreenroad@gmail.com . Subscribe by typing the word subscribe in the subject line.

COPYRIGHT

Wayne Dyer - What You Think, You Become (Wayne Dyer Meditation)

"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:www.lawcornel.edu/uscode.

Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.

WHAT YOU CAN DO: SHARE THIS ARTICLE

A Green Road; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. 

Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? 

Support AGR and share this article via by copying and pasting title and url into;

Website and contact page

Index, Table Of Contents

End

Trump's Clean Coal Hormesis Theory Debunked, Promoting Disastrous Toxic Coal Energy Policy; Pro Clean Nuclear Hormesis Theory Propaganda and Lie Exposed And Debunked, Coal Plants Are The Largest Source Of Toxic/Poison Emissions In Average Town - 9 Coal Trump Bankruptcies
https://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/11/coal-plants-emit-more-radiation-than.html